Sunday, November 30, 2008
CHICAGO TRIBUNE DEC 01 - OPEN LETTER TO OBAMA
MUST READ - MUST READ
This subject is catching on fire in more and more places
Saturday, November 29, 2008
MSNBC CITIZENSHIP ISSUE COMMENTARY
WHILE EVERYONE MAY BE GETTING BORED WITH THE BIRTH ISSUE AND THINK WE SHOULD BE GETTING GOING INSTEAD, OUR CONSTITUTION, BY WHICH SO MUCH OF OUR LIVES AND FREEDOMS ARE GUARANTEED, HAS SPECIFICALLY SET GROUND RULES THAT MANY DO NOT QUITE UNDERSTAND AND THINK MIGHT BE A WASTE OF TIME.
BUT, IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT, THIS IS NO DIFFERENT THAN ANY JOB REQUIRING A UNIVERSITY DEGREE TO QUALIFY FOR THAT POSITION OR A POLICE OFFICER HAVING HAD TO HAVE ATTENDED A POLICE ACADEMY TO QUALIFY TO BE HIRED AS A POLICEMAN.
THE SAME APPLIES TO BEING HIRED AS PRESIDENT OF THE USA.
WHICH RIVAL GETS HIRED DEPENDS ON OUR VOTES, BUT WHO QUALIFIES TO BE HIRED DEPENDS ON MEETING THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION AS APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF THE BIRTH.
LISTEN CAREFULLY TO THE POINTS MADE HERE AS THEY ARE FAIRLY CLEARLY STATED.
FOR THE FIRST TIME A MASS MEDIA STATION HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY.
BUT, IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT, THIS IS NO DIFFERENT THAN ANY JOB REQUIRING A UNIVERSITY DEGREE TO QUALIFY FOR THAT POSITION OR A POLICE OFFICER HAVING HAD TO HAVE ATTENDED A POLICE ACADEMY TO QUALIFY TO BE HIRED AS A POLICEMAN.
THE SAME APPLIES TO BEING HIRED AS PRESIDENT OF THE USA.
WHICH RIVAL GETS HIRED DEPENDS ON OUR VOTES, BUT WHO QUALIFIES TO BE HIRED DEPENDS ON MEETING THE RULES OF THE CONSTITUTION AS APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF THE BIRTH.
LISTEN CAREFULLY TO THE POINTS MADE HERE AS THEY ARE FAIRLY CLEARLY STATED.
FOR THE FIRST TIME A MASS MEDIA STATION HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY.
Friday, November 28, 2008
TOP HITS RADIO LINK
Playing as I post this.
GREAT RADIO LINK FOR FOCUS IN TOP SONGS OF VARIOUS DECADES CLICK HERE
Try it and bookmark it for future use. Have a great weekend.
GREAT RADIO LINK FOR FOCUS IN TOP SONGS OF VARIOUS DECADES CLICK HERE
Try it and bookmark it for future use. Have a great weekend.
SEVEN OR MORE BRITISH PASSPORT, LONDONISTAN PAKISTANIS, IN MUMBAI ATTACK (UPDATED)
(LONDONISTAN, FORMERLY ENGLAND AND EURABIA, FORMERLY EUROPEAN UNION)
LINK TO OBEROI HOTEL click here
Taj Mahal Hotel
LINK TO OBEROI HOTEL click here
Taj Mahal Hotel
Indian anti-terrorist chief Hemant Karkar was among those killed in Mumbai. He had been threatened since September for perceived mistreatement of Moslems but there appears to be a link to Somali pirates funding a revenge attack on India for recently sinking one of their ships .
I hope the Indian counter terrorism authorities will quickly find the time to carefully view the videos made by journalists or the public of events as I have noticed some older aged "gawkers" who would easily profile as islamists, one of whom I saw could easily be an Iranian. They might ask Pakistan's ISI to have a look and perhaps spot some of their own among them. Giving them up would be a goodwill gesture.
"Someone commented that luckily the terrorist atrocities come one at a time."
One atrocity at a time - for now. Given an excuse to rampage, such as a perfectly deserved and valid attack on islamic iran, attacks such as these will flare up in THOUSANDS all over the globe including inside America.
Being largely one of the contributing reasons for a delay in violently disabling islamic iran's nuclear facilities.
There are reportedly some 40,000 suicide bombers and terrorist like the Mumbai ones already in place JUST IN AMERICA.
Europe/Eurabia probably has well double or triple that with France and England leading in numbers. AND any number of highly trained “white Al Qaeda” coming in from Kosovo and Albania without much, IF ANY, control on passports.
Perhaps Mumbai will be a wake up call to Eurabia to tighten their security even if it means a reduction in their liberal social and political attitudes that were never meant to deal with jihadism, violent or political infiltration of sharia law and Moslem customs as the “norm”.
Or demand to be catered to on an equal basis with centuries old former national mindsets and esablished religions. Or even given priority over usual national norms.
Eurabia has agreed to allow over 100,000 Iraqis into their countries. Want to bet quite a number of terrorists will sneak in this way?
Specially after Bush hands over to Obama.
Obama’s planned Marxist type of Million Man Civil Security Force, intent on keeping him and Communist type government in control now and in the future, may become a double edge sword and be able to deal with islamic terrorist.
Only of course, if Obama, with his 20-year anti-American Christian indoctrination (Dr. Wright) and his own Moslem upbringing, do not turn this civil force on all of us to ENFORCE islamic sharia.
In many ways (except the former does not acknowledge there is a deity) Communism and islam are very, very similar in attitudes.
The only real difference is that islam demands obedience to a moon god, while Communism demands obedience and dependency on the ruling government, with some figurehead like Obama at the helm.
Thursday, November 27, 2008
VIDEOS DISCUSS OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE
THIS CHURCH SPEAKER APPEARS TO HAVE A MIDDLE EASTERN ACCENT
DETAILED POINTS AND GRAPHICS
DETAILED PART TWO
THIS SPEAKS FOR ITSELF TO A DIFFERENT AUDIENCE
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
ISLAMIC IDIOT WAVES TO BLIND SCHOOL GIRLS
ISLAMIC IRAN'S "DOCTOR", "PROFESSOR" AHMADI-NEJAD THE TURD WAVES TO GIRLS AT A SCHOOL FOR BLIND GIRLS! TOTALLY BLIND GIRLS.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
BIRTH CERTIFICATE ISSUE LEGITIMATE - BUT IS OBAMA?
Does this Barack Obama birth certificate issue bug you because, although improbable, it's possible that he's not a natural born citizen, isn't eligible to be President under the Constitution, and this issue could be bigger than Watergate -- or any other "gate" in history?
Are you afraid that if you were even to raise the subject with your friends that they will think you wear a tinfoil hat, because Factcheck.org, the final arbiter of truth in the universe, said so? Not!
Are you with the news media, and after spending so much money to get Barack Obama elected, you'd hate to ruin your investment?
Are you a talk radio host who thinks that if you say the burden of proof needed to demonstrate one is eligible to be Commander in Chief should be at least as high as, oh, say, the level to be eligible for Hawaiian homestead status (see 1.F. below), that you'd be forced to give equal time to someone who disagrees?
Are you a conservative, libertarian, or any conscientious constitutionalist from any ideological side of life, who's convinced something's not right, but you're afraid your reputation might be tarnished because, after all, this could be one big Saul-Alinsky-style set-up, and the joke would be on you?
Fear not! Joe the Farmer has prepared an outline showing that no matter how this issue is ultimately resolved, you have legitimate concerns, and that Barack Obama should, simply out of respect for the nation he was elected to lead, disclose the sealed vault copy of his birth certificate.
Given the circumstances, if Barack Obama respected this nation, he would prove it by the simplest and easiest of gestures - unless, of course, all this talk about change and hope was just a bunch of bull, and he's just "another politician." Here's the outline:
1. Under Hawaiian law, it is possible (both legally and illegally) for a person to have been born out of state, yet have a birth certificate on file in the Department of Health.
A. From Hawaii's official Department of Health, Vital Records webpage: "Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign country" (applies to adopted children).
B. A parent may register an in-state birth in lieu of certification by a hospital of birth under HRS 338-5.
C. Hawaiian law expressly provides for registration of out-of-state births under HRS 338-17.8. A foreign birth presumably would have been recorded by the American consular of the country of birth, and presumably that would be reflected on the Hawaiian birth certificate.
D. Hawaiian law, however, expressly acknowledges that its system is subject to error. See, for example, HRS 338-17.
E. Hawaiian law expressly provides for verification in lieu of certified copy of a birth certificate under HRS 338-14.3.
F. Even the Hawaii Department of Home Lands does not accept a certified copy of a birth certificate as conclusive evidence for its homestead program. From its web site: "In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout).
Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL."
2. Contrary to what you may have read, no document made available to the public, nor any statement by Hawaiian officials, evidences conclusively that Obama was born in Hawaii.
A. Associated Press reported about a statement of Hawaii Health Department Director Dr. Fukino, "State declares Obama birth certificate genuine."
B. That October 31, 2008 statement says that Dr. Fukino "ha[s] personally seen and verified that the Hawai'i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures." That statement does not, however, verify that Obama was born in Hawaii, and as explained above, under Hawaiian policies and procedures it is quite possible that Hawaii may have a birth record of a person not born in Hawaii. Unlikely, but possible.
C. The document that the Obama campaign released to the public is a certified copy of Obama's birth record, which is not the best evidence since, even under Hawaiian law, the original vault copy is the better evidence. Presumably, the vault record would show whether his birth was registered by a hospital in Hawaii.
D. Without accusing anyone of any wrongdoing, we nevertheless know that some people have gone to great lengths, even in violation of laws, rules and procedures, to confer the many benefits of United States citizenship on themselves and their children. Given the structure of the Hawaiian law, the fact that a parent may register a birth, and the limited but inherent potential for human error within the system, it is possible that a parent of a child born out-of-state could have registered that birth to confer the benefits of U.S. citizenship, or simply to avoid bureaucratic hassles at that time or later in the child's life.
1. We don't know whether the standards of registration by the Department of Health were more or less stringent in 1961 (the year of Obama's birth) than they are today. However, especially with post-9/11 scrutiny, we do know that there have been instances of fraudulent registrations of foreign births as American births.
2. From a 2004 Department of Justice news release about multiple New Jersey vital statistics employees engaged in schemes to issue birth certificates to foreign-born individuals: "An individual who paid Anderson and her co-conspirators for the service of creating the false birth records could then go to Office of Vital Statistics to receive a birth certificate . . . As part of the investigation, federal agents executed a search warrant of the HCOVS on Feb. 18, 2004, which resulted in the seizure of hundreds of suspect Certificates of Live Birth which falsely indicated that the named individuals were born in Jersey City, when in fact, they were born outside the United States and were in the United States illegally . . . Bhutta purchased from Goswamy false birth certificates for himself and his three foreign-born children."
3. Even before 9/11, government officials acknowledged the "ease" of obtaining birth certificates fraudulently. From 1999 testimony by one Social Security Administration official: "Furthermore, the identity data contained in Social Security records are only as reliable as the evidence on which the data are based. The documents that a card applicant must present to establish age, identity, and citizenship, usually a birth certificate and immigration documents-are relatively easy to alter, counterfeit, or obtain fraudulently."
3. It has been reported that the Kenyan government has sealed Obama's records. If he were born in Kenya, as has been rumored even recently, the Kenyan government would certainly have many incentives to keep that undisclosed. Objectively, of course, those records may prove nothing. Obama's refusal to release records at many levels here in the United States, though, merely fuels speculation.
4. Obama has refused to disclose the vault copy of his Hawaiian birth certificate. This raises the question whether he himself has established that he is eligible to be President. To date, no state or federal election official, nor any government authority, has verified that he ever established conclusively that he meets the eligibility standard under the Constitution. If the burden of proof were on him, perhaps as it should be for the highest office of any individual in America, the more-than-dozen lawsuits challenging his eligibility would be unnecessary.
A. Had he disclosed his vault copy in the Berg v. Obama lawsuit (which was the first lawsuit filed on the question of his eligibility to be President), and it was established he was born in Hawaii, that would have constituted res judicata, and acted to stop other similar lawsuits being filed. Without res judicata (meaning, the matter is adjudged and settled conclusively) he or government officials will need to defend other lawsuits, and valuable court resources will be expended. Strategically from a legal standpoint, therefore, his refusal to disclose doesn't make sense. Weighing factors such as costs, resources and complexity of disclosing versus not disclosing, he must have reason of considerable downside in disclosing, or upside in not disclosing. There may be other reasons, but one could speculate that he hasn't disclosed because:
1. He was not born in Hawaii, and may not be eligible to be President;
2. He was born in Hawaii, but facts that may be derived from his vault copy birth certificate are inconsistent with the life story he has told (and sold);
3. He was born in Hawaii, and his refusal to provide the best evidence that he is a natural born citizen is a means by which to draw criticism of him in order to make him appear to be a "victim." This would energize his supporters. This would also make other charges about him seem suspect, including his concealment about ties to Bill Ayers and others of some infamy. Such a clever yet distasteful tactic would seem to be a Machiavelli- and Saul-Alinsky-style way to manipulate public opinion.
But while this tactic may energize his supporters, it would convince those who believe him to be a manipulator that he's not only just that, but a real pro at it. This would indeed be the basest reason of all, and would have repercussions about his trustworthiness (both here and abroad), which Americans know, is a characteristic sorely lacking in its leaders.
B. His motion to dismiss the Berg case for lack of standing could be viewed as contemptuous of the Constitution. See, "Who Enforces the Constitution's Natural Born Citizen Clause?" Are we to expect yet another White House that hides behind lawyers, and expects Americans to swallow half-truths on a just-trust-me basis?
C. This issue poses the potential for a constitutional crisis unlike anything this country has seen. Disclosure at this stage, however, could even result in criminal sanctions. See, "Obama Must Stand Up Now Or Step Down." Thus, he has motive not to disclose if he were ineligible.
The question not being asked by the holders of power, who dismiss this as a rightwing conspiracy, is what's the downside of disclosing? This is a legitimate issue of inquiry because Barack Obama has turned it into one. The growing number of people who demand an answer in conformance with the Constitution are doing their work; the people's watchdogs aren't.
The pen name Joe the Farmer pays tribute to Joe the Plumber, who had the audacity to ask a question.
Courtesy American Thinker
Are you afraid that if you were even to raise the subject with your friends that they will think you wear a tinfoil hat, because Factcheck.org, the final arbiter of truth in the universe, said so? Not!
Are you with the news media, and after spending so much money to get Barack Obama elected, you'd hate to ruin your investment?
Are you a talk radio host who thinks that if you say the burden of proof needed to demonstrate one is eligible to be Commander in Chief should be at least as high as, oh, say, the level to be eligible for Hawaiian homestead status (see 1.F. below), that you'd be forced to give equal time to someone who disagrees?
Are you a conservative, libertarian, or any conscientious constitutionalist from any ideological side of life, who's convinced something's not right, but you're afraid your reputation might be tarnished because, after all, this could be one big Saul-Alinsky-style set-up, and the joke would be on you?
Fear not! Joe the Farmer has prepared an outline showing that no matter how this issue is ultimately resolved, you have legitimate concerns, and that Barack Obama should, simply out of respect for the nation he was elected to lead, disclose the sealed vault copy of his birth certificate.
Given the circumstances, if Barack Obama respected this nation, he would prove it by the simplest and easiest of gestures - unless, of course, all this talk about change and hope was just a bunch of bull, and he's just "another politician." Here's the outline:
1. Under Hawaiian law, it is possible (both legally and illegally) for a person to have been born out of state, yet have a birth certificate on file in the Department of Health.
A. From Hawaii's official Department of Health, Vital Records webpage: "Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign country" (applies to adopted children).
B. A parent may register an in-state birth in lieu of certification by a hospital of birth under HRS 338-5.
C. Hawaiian law expressly provides for registration of out-of-state births under HRS 338-17.8. A foreign birth presumably would have been recorded by the American consular of the country of birth, and presumably that would be reflected on the Hawaiian birth certificate.
D. Hawaiian law, however, expressly acknowledges that its system is subject to error. See, for example, HRS 338-17.
E. Hawaiian law expressly provides for verification in lieu of certified copy of a birth certificate under HRS 338-14.3.
F. Even the Hawaii Department of Home Lands does not accept a certified copy of a birth certificate as conclusive evidence for its homestead program. From its web site: "In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout).
Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL."
2. Contrary to what you may have read, no document made available to the public, nor any statement by Hawaiian officials, evidences conclusively that Obama was born in Hawaii.
A. Associated Press reported about a statement of Hawaii Health Department Director Dr. Fukino, "State declares Obama birth certificate genuine."
B. That October 31, 2008 statement says that Dr. Fukino "ha[s] personally seen and verified that the Hawai'i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures." That statement does not, however, verify that Obama was born in Hawaii, and as explained above, under Hawaiian policies and procedures it is quite possible that Hawaii may have a birth record of a person not born in Hawaii. Unlikely, but possible.
C. The document that the Obama campaign released to the public is a certified copy of Obama's birth record, which is not the best evidence since, even under Hawaiian law, the original vault copy is the better evidence. Presumably, the vault record would show whether his birth was registered by a hospital in Hawaii.
D. Without accusing anyone of any wrongdoing, we nevertheless know that some people have gone to great lengths, even in violation of laws, rules and procedures, to confer the many benefits of United States citizenship on themselves and their children. Given the structure of the Hawaiian law, the fact that a parent may register a birth, and the limited but inherent potential for human error within the system, it is possible that a parent of a child born out-of-state could have registered that birth to confer the benefits of U.S. citizenship, or simply to avoid bureaucratic hassles at that time or later in the child's life.
1. We don't know whether the standards of registration by the Department of Health were more or less stringent in 1961 (the year of Obama's birth) than they are today. However, especially with post-9/11 scrutiny, we do know that there have been instances of fraudulent registrations of foreign births as American births.
2. From a 2004 Department of Justice news release about multiple New Jersey vital statistics employees engaged in schemes to issue birth certificates to foreign-born individuals: "An individual who paid Anderson and her co-conspirators for the service of creating the false birth records could then go to Office of Vital Statistics to receive a birth certificate . . . As part of the investigation, federal agents executed a search warrant of the HCOVS on Feb. 18, 2004, which resulted in the seizure of hundreds of suspect Certificates of Live Birth which falsely indicated that the named individuals were born in Jersey City, when in fact, they were born outside the United States and were in the United States illegally . . . Bhutta purchased from Goswamy false birth certificates for himself and his three foreign-born children."
3. Even before 9/11, government officials acknowledged the "ease" of obtaining birth certificates fraudulently. From 1999 testimony by one Social Security Administration official: "Furthermore, the identity data contained in Social Security records are only as reliable as the evidence on which the data are based. The documents that a card applicant must present to establish age, identity, and citizenship, usually a birth certificate and immigration documents-are relatively easy to alter, counterfeit, or obtain fraudulently."
3. It has been reported that the Kenyan government has sealed Obama's records. If he were born in Kenya, as has been rumored even recently, the Kenyan government would certainly have many incentives to keep that undisclosed. Objectively, of course, those records may prove nothing. Obama's refusal to release records at many levels here in the United States, though, merely fuels speculation.
4. Obama has refused to disclose the vault copy of his Hawaiian birth certificate. This raises the question whether he himself has established that he is eligible to be President. To date, no state or federal election official, nor any government authority, has verified that he ever established conclusively that he meets the eligibility standard under the Constitution. If the burden of proof were on him, perhaps as it should be for the highest office of any individual in America, the more-than-dozen lawsuits challenging his eligibility would be unnecessary.
A. Had he disclosed his vault copy in the Berg v. Obama lawsuit (which was the first lawsuit filed on the question of his eligibility to be President), and it was established he was born in Hawaii, that would have constituted res judicata, and acted to stop other similar lawsuits being filed. Without res judicata (meaning, the matter is adjudged and settled conclusively) he or government officials will need to defend other lawsuits, and valuable court resources will be expended. Strategically from a legal standpoint, therefore, his refusal to disclose doesn't make sense. Weighing factors such as costs, resources and complexity of disclosing versus not disclosing, he must have reason of considerable downside in disclosing, or upside in not disclosing. There may be other reasons, but one could speculate that he hasn't disclosed because:
1. He was not born in Hawaii, and may not be eligible to be President;
2. He was born in Hawaii, but facts that may be derived from his vault copy birth certificate are inconsistent with the life story he has told (and sold);
3. He was born in Hawaii, and his refusal to provide the best evidence that he is a natural born citizen is a means by which to draw criticism of him in order to make him appear to be a "victim." This would energize his supporters. This would also make other charges about him seem suspect, including his concealment about ties to Bill Ayers and others of some infamy. Such a clever yet distasteful tactic would seem to be a Machiavelli- and Saul-Alinsky-style way to manipulate public opinion.
But while this tactic may energize his supporters, it would convince those who believe him to be a manipulator that he's not only just that, but a real pro at it. This would indeed be the basest reason of all, and would have repercussions about his trustworthiness (both here and abroad), which Americans know, is a characteristic sorely lacking in its leaders.
B. His motion to dismiss the Berg case for lack of standing could be viewed as contemptuous of the Constitution. See, "Who Enforces the Constitution's Natural Born Citizen Clause?" Are we to expect yet another White House that hides behind lawyers, and expects Americans to swallow half-truths on a just-trust-me basis?
C. This issue poses the potential for a constitutional crisis unlike anything this country has seen. Disclosure at this stage, however, could even result in criminal sanctions. See, "Obama Must Stand Up Now Or Step Down." Thus, he has motive not to disclose if he were ineligible.
The question not being asked by the holders of power, who dismiss this as a rightwing conspiracy, is what's the downside of disclosing? This is a legitimate issue of inquiry because Barack Obama has turned it into one. The growing number of people who demand an answer in conformance with the Constitution are doing their work; the people's watchdogs aren't.
The pen name Joe the Farmer pays tribute to Joe the Plumber, who had the audacity to ask a question.
Courtesy American Thinker
CELESTIAL VIRGIN
Great News from Allah ......
Al Qaeda leader 'Abu Musab al-Zarqawi', the mastermind behind hundreds of bombings, killings and suicide attacks in Iraq who was killed this past summer by US Forces in Iraq , has now met with the first of his 72 virgins that Allah promised!!
Punishment comes in many forms! (scroll down)
Al Qaeda leader 'Abu Musab al-Zarqawi', the mastermind behind hundreds of bombings, killings and suicide attacks in Iraq who was killed this past summer by US Forces in Iraq , has now met with the first of his 72 virgins that Allah promised!!
Punishment comes in many forms! (scroll down)
AND AMERICAN VOLUNTEER FOR INCLUSION AMONG 72 VIRGINS
Monday, November 24, 2008
THE TERRORIST PRESIDENT OF AMERICA - JIMMUH CARTER
Jimmuh the idiot Carter, self-proclaimed, hypocritical man of God and lay preacher has damaged America and the whole world more than can be imagined and is the source and creator of our terrorist problems to which he gave birth and has since fanned into flames on a regular basis.
If there is anyone more Marxist than Obama and directly a traitor to our nation and to the principles of Democracy it is Jimmuh Carter, who still rubs shoulders and promotes the worst of Communist dictators and established oppressors of their nationals, like Castro, Chavez and other South American Marxist leaders.
Even those closest to him have left his side for the lies he published in his own books and have refuted him. He now begs for alms (sizeable ones) from anti-Israel Arab nations and Communist sources.
My own fear is that Obama will in some or many ways follow in Carter's footsteps and fail to confront Islamic Jihad and Communist midsets he has acquired over the years from friends and mentors and crash and burn the world, not just the USA.
Does not help when MIchelle recently dresses up as a deadly Black Widow spider as the theme for her gown. Demands a total suspension of credibility for this to have been a coincidence. (Scroll down to the article with the photos).
Anything else apart, Obama may have started out with ambitious good intentions but the way to hell is paved with those and Obama faces a national and global situation he neither has the experience nor the mind sets needed to resolve them.
Khomeini had more hatred for Iran, a country of which he was not a true citizen either, (nor had a drop of Iranian blood in his veins), than Obama and Michelle combined but the parallel similarities of Obama's mindsets and weaknesses and Khomeini are striking and as threatening to the well being of our nation as Khomeini was to Iran.
For selfish reasons of our survival, personal and societal, I hope Obama does NOT turn into the American Khomeini as my fears and doubts tend to picture him and pulls us out of our predicaments without turning us into a Socialist/Marxist society for which his past character builders have provided him with an advanced prediliction.
Let us pray, commune or meditate with our higher beings on a positive outcome!
video CARTER THE ARCHITECT OF ISLAMIC TERROR click here
CARTER'S EXTORTION OF THE SHAH click here
If there is anyone more Marxist than Obama and directly a traitor to our nation and to the principles of Democracy it is Jimmuh Carter, who still rubs shoulders and promotes the worst of Communist dictators and established oppressors of their nationals, like Castro, Chavez and other South American Marxist leaders.
Even those closest to him have left his side for the lies he published in his own books and have refuted him. He now begs for alms (sizeable ones) from anti-Israel Arab nations and Communist sources.
My own fear is that Obama will in some or many ways follow in Carter's footsteps and fail to confront Islamic Jihad and Communist midsets he has acquired over the years from friends and mentors and crash and burn the world, not just the USA.
Does not help when MIchelle recently dresses up as a deadly Black Widow spider as the theme for her gown. Demands a total suspension of credibility for this to have been a coincidence. (Scroll down to the article with the photos).
Anything else apart, Obama may have started out with ambitious good intentions but the way to hell is paved with those and Obama faces a national and global situation he neither has the experience nor the mind sets needed to resolve them.
Khomeini had more hatred for Iran, a country of which he was not a true citizen either, (nor had a drop of Iranian blood in his veins), than Obama and Michelle combined but the parallel similarities of Obama's mindsets and weaknesses and Khomeini are striking and as threatening to the well being of our nation as Khomeini was to Iran.
For selfish reasons of our survival, personal and societal, I hope Obama does NOT turn into the American Khomeini as my fears and doubts tend to picture him and pulls us out of our predicaments without turning us into a Socialist/Marxist society for which his past character builders have provided him with an advanced prediliction.
Let us pray, commune or meditate with our higher beings on a positive outcome!
video CARTER THE ARCHITECT OF ISLAMIC TERROR click here
CARTER'S EXTORTION OF THE SHAH click here
ARRESTED FOR WEARING A MCCAIN-PALIN T-SHIRT
SUPPRESSION OF FREE SPEECH BY OBAMAOISTS
Sunday, November 23, 2008
VERY, VERY DETAILED FINAL ANALYSIS ON BC/COLB STATUS BY PROFESSIONAL DOCUMENT EXPERT
PROLOGUE:
In this Supreme Court case, decided the year Obama was born, on the question of citizenship, not "natural born citizenship," the Court held:
Petitioner's mother is a native-born citizen of the United States, and his father is an Italian citizen who has never been naturalized.
They were married in the United States, and their marital relationship has never been terminated.
Petitioner was born in Italy in 1906, while his parents were residing there temporarily, and his mother brought him to the United States later in the same year.
He has since resided continuously in the United States, and has never been naturalized.
Held: Petitioner is NOT a citizen of the United States. Pp. 366 U. S. 309-315.
========
MUST READ MUST READ MUST READ MUST READ MUST READ
IN FULL IN FULL IN FULL IN FULL IN FULL IN FULL IN FULL
OBAMA WILL NOT TAKE AWAY YOUR GUNS - HE WILL TAKE AWAY YOUR AMMUNITION
Ammunition Accountability Act
Heads up all of you who swore to defend the Constitution of the UnitedStates against all enemies, foreign AND domestic.
Alan Note: the Ammunition Accountability Act shall easily evolve into Obama's Civil Defense Force becoming the only ones to legally possess more than a few rounds of ammunition and as your Civil Security Organization ACT ON YOUR BEHALF - thus you would not need to have ammunition or guns. Since as one interpretation of the Constitution contends only civil militia has the right to carry and own guns.
So there it is and you are suddenly disenfranchised from possessing guns or ammunition because there now exists a civil militia to "protect" you!
No, it's not far fetched.
Fits exactly with Obama's viftually disarming our MILITARY, preventing it from acquiring new technology weapons, creating his brainwashed ONE MILLION person Youth Civil Security Force to rule our neighborhoods (like Khomeini's neighborhood Committees headed by a cleric with powers to order arrests).
Khomeini used the Communist playbook (directed tactic by tactic by the Soviet Embassy in Tehran to install his islamic revolution).
For a preview of what is happening to us here under Obama, study the structure and policies of Khomeini's revolution and compare them to what Obama proclaims fairly openly.
The only difference is the amount or extent of violence he can use to implement his aims - both restricted by American basic mindsets - (no, NOT LAWS, which can be changed quickly in a Democrat controlled Legistrature to suit his aims) and inciting a counter-revolution or civil war. Again not so far fetched if you can think outside the box.
All you politicians get to work DO NOT LET THIS HAPPEN!!!
Ok, lets get out there and let our state Legislature know that we do notwant this bill passed, and petition them to vote no on this bill. We should keep after thim untill the bill is closed.
By bombarding them with e-mails,phone calls, and letters.
Remember how Obama said that he wasn't going to take your guns? Well, it seems that his minions and allies in the anti-gun world have no problem with taking your ammo!
The bill that is being pushed in 18 states (including Illinois and Indiana) requires all ammunition to be encoded by the manufacture of a database of all ammunition sales.
So they will know how much you buy and what calibers. Nobody can sell any ammunition after June 30, 2009 unless the ammunition is coded.
Any privately held uncoded ammunition must be destroyed by July 1, 2011. (Including handloaded ammo.) They will also charge a .05 cent tax on every round so every box of ammo you buy will go up at least $2.50 or more!
If they can deprive you of ammo they do not need to take your gun!
This legislation is currently pending in 18 states:
Alabama, Arizona,California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland,Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island,South Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington.
To find more about the anti-gun group that is sponsoring this legislationand the specific legislation for each state, go to:
http://ammunitionaccountability.org/Legislation.htm
Ammunition Accountability Act
SAMPLE LEGISLATION
An ACT relating to firearms and ammunition; requiring [AGENCY] to establish a statewide database to track coded ammunition manufactured and sold for handguns and assault rifles.
Section 1. Legislative Findings.
The State Legislature hereby finds the following: Each year in the United States, more than 30% of all homicides that involve a gun go unsolved. Handgun ammunition accounts for 80% of all ammunition sold in the United States. Current technology for matching a bullet used in a crime to the gun that fired it has worked moderately well for years, but presupposes that the weapon was recovered by law enforcement.
Bullet coding is a new and effective way for law enforcement to quickly identify persons of interest in gun crime investigations.
Section 2. Definitions.
For purposes of this chapter, "coded ammunition" means a bullet carrying a unique identifier that has been applied by etching onto the base of the bullet projectile.
Section 3.
Prohibition on possession or sale of non-coded ammunition.
1. All handgun and assault weapon ammunition manufactured or sold in the state after January 1, 2009, shall be coded by the manufacturer.
a. The calibers covered by the coding requirement shall include: [LIST CALIBERS].
2. No later than January 1, 2011, all non-coded ammunition for the calibers listed in this chapter, whether owned by private citizens or retail outlets, must be disposed.
Section 4.
Authority to establish an Ammunition Coding Database.
1. [AGENCY] shall be responsible for establishing and maintaining an Ammunition Coding Database (ACD) containing the following information:a. Manufacturer registry -
Manufacturers shall:
i. Register with [AGENCY] in a manner prescribed by the department through rule; and
ii. Maintain records on the business premises for a period of seven years concerning all sales, loans, and transfers of ammunition, to, from, or within the state.
b. Vendor registry - Vendors shalli. Register with [AGENCY] in a manner prescribed by the department through rule; and
ii. Record the following information in a format prescribed by the [AGENCY]:
a. The date of the transaction.
b. The name of the transferee.
c. The purchaser's driver's license number or other government issued identification card number
d. The date of birth of the purchaser.
e. The unique identifier of all handgun ammunition or
bullets transferred.
f. All other information prescribed by [AGENCY].
iii. Maintain records on the business premises for a period of three years from the date of the recorded purchase.
2. To the greatest extent possible or practical, the ACD shall be built within the framework of existing firearms databases. The ACD shall be operational no later than January 1, 2009.
3. Privacy of individuals is of the utmost importance. Access to information in the ACSD is reserved for key law enforcement personnel and to be released only in connection with a criminal investigation.
NEW SECTION:
Section 5. Penalties
1. Any vendor that willfully fails to comply with, or falsifies the records required to be kept by this bill is guilty of a public offense punishable by imprisonment not to exceed one year, and a fine of $1,000.
2. Any manufacturer that fails to comply with the provisions of this section shall be liable for a civil fine of not more than one $1,000 for a first violation, not more than five $5,000 for a second violation, and not more $10,000 for a third and subsequent violation.
3. Any person who willfully destroys, obliterates, or otherwise renders unreadable, theserialization required pursuant to this bill, on any bullet or assembled ammunition ispunishable by imprisonment not to exceed one year, and a fine of $1,000.
NEW SECTION:
Section 6. Funding.
1. Establishing and maintaining the ACD shall be funded by an end-user fee not toexceed [COST NUMBER, ESTIMATED AT $0.005 PER BULLET OR ROUNDOF AMMUNITION].
2. There is hereby established the Coded Ammunition Fund for deposit of the enduserfees described in this section. Moneys in the fund, upon appropriation, shall be available to the [AGENCY] for infrastructure, implementation, operational, enforcement, and future development costs of this chapter.
3. Ammunition manufacturers based within this state may submit a one-time taxcredit application for cost of purchasing ammunition coding equipment.
All applications must be submitted by January 1, 2009.-- END --
NOTE: To view a more detailed version of Ammunition Coding Database legislation that was proposed in other states, visit
http://www.ammunitionaccountability.org/ .
Gordon Thomas Honeywell Governmental Affairs can also provide drafting guidance.
Contact Briahna Taylor at (253) 620-6640 or btaylor@gth-gov.com
and Joyce Hutcheson Gab Creek Farm: Foundation Morgans
http://www.gabcreekfarm.com
Heads up all of you who swore to defend the Constitution of the UnitedStates against all enemies, foreign AND domestic.
Alan Note: the Ammunition Accountability Act shall easily evolve into Obama's Civil Defense Force becoming the only ones to legally possess more than a few rounds of ammunition and as your Civil Security Organization ACT ON YOUR BEHALF - thus you would not need to have ammunition or guns. Since as one interpretation of the Constitution contends only civil militia has the right to carry and own guns.
So there it is and you are suddenly disenfranchised from possessing guns or ammunition because there now exists a civil militia to "protect" you!
No, it's not far fetched.
Fits exactly with Obama's viftually disarming our MILITARY, preventing it from acquiring new technology weapons, creating his brainwashed ONE MILLION person Youth Civil Security Force to rule our neighborhoods (like Khomeini's neighborhood Committees headed by a cleric with powers to order arrests).
Khomeini used the Communist playbook (directed tactic by tactic by the Soviet Embassy in Tehran to install his islamic revolution).
For a preview of what is happening to us here under Obama, study the structure and policies of Khomeini's revolution and compare them to what Obama proclaims fairly openly.
The only difference is the amount or extent of violence he can use to implement his aims - both restricted by American basic mindsets - (no, NOT LAWS, which can be changed quickly in a Democrat controlled Legistrature to suit his aims) and inciting a counter-revolution or civil war. Again not so far fetched if you can think outside the box.
All you politicians get to work DO NOT LET THIS HAPPEN!!!
Ok, lets get out there and let our state Legislature know that we do notwant this bill passed, and petition them to vote no on this bill. We should keep after thim untill the bill is closed.
By bombarding them with e-mails,phone calls, and letters.
Remember how Obama said that he wasn't going to take your guns? Well, it seems that his minions and allies in the anti-gun world have no problem with taking your ammo!
The bill that is being pushed in 18 states (including Illinois and Indiana) requires all ammunition to be encoded by the manufacture of a database of all ammunition sales.
So they will know how much you buy and what calibers. Nobody can sell any ammunition after June 30, 2009 unless the ammunition is coded.
Any privately held uncoded ammunition must be destroyed by July 1, 2011. (Including handloaded ammo.) They will also charge a .05 cent tax on every round so every box of ammo you buy will go up at least $2.50 or more!
If they can deprive you of ammo they do not need to take your gun!
This legislation is currently pending in 18 states:
Alabama, Arizona,California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland,Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island,South Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington.
To find more about the anti-gun group that is sponsoring this legislationand the specific legislation for each state, go to:
http://ammunitionaccountability.org/Legislation.htm
Ammunition Accountability Act
SAMPLE LEGISLATION
An ACT relating to firearms and ammunition; requiring [AGENCY] to establish a statewide database to track coded ammunition manufactured and sold for handguns and assault rifles.
Section 1. Legislative Findings.
The State Legislature hereby finds the following: Each year in the United States, more than 30% of all homicides that involve a gun go unsolved. Handgun ammunition accounts for 80% of all ammunition sold in the United States. Current technology for matching a bullet used in a crime to the gun that fired it has worked moderately well for years, but presupposes that the weapon was recovered by law enforcement.
Bullet coding is a new and effective way for law enforcement to quickly identify persons of interest in gun crime investigations.
Section 2. Definitions.
For purposes of this chapter, "coded ammunition" means a bullet carrying a unique identifier that has been applied by etching onto the base of the bullet projectile.
Section 3.
Prohibition on possession or sale of non-coded ammunition.
1. All handgun and assault weapon ammunition manufactured or sold in the state after January 1, 2009, shall be coded by the manufacturer.
a. The calibers covered by the coding requirement shall include: [LIST CALIBERS].
2. No later than January 1, 2011, all non-coded ammunition for the calibers listed in this chapter, whether owned by private citizens or retail outlets, must be disposed.
Section 4.
Authority to establish an Ammunition Coding Database.
1. [AGENCY] shall be responsible for establishing and maintaining an Ammunition Coding Database (ACD) containing the following information:a. Manufacturer registry -
Manufacturers shall:
i. Register with [AGENCY] in a manner prescribed by the department through rule; and
ii. Maintain records on the business premises for a period of seven years concerning all sales, loans, and transfers of ammunition, to, from, or within the state.
b. Vendor registry - Vendors shalli. Register with [AGENCY] in a manner prescribed by the department through rule; and
ii. Record the following information in a format prescribed by the [AGENCY]:
a. The date of the transaction.
b. The name of the transferee.
c. The purchaser's driver's license number or other government issued identification card number
d. The date of birth of the purchaser.
e. The unique identifier of all handgun ammunition or
bullets transferred.
f. All other information prescribed by [AGENCY].
iii. Maintain records on the business premises for a period of three years from the date of the recorded purchase.
2. To the greatest extent possible or practical, the ACD shall be built within the framework of existing firearms databases. The ACD shall be operational no later than January 1, 2009.
3. Privacy of individuals is of the utmost importance. Access to information in the ACSD is reserved for key law enforcement personnel and to be released only in connection with a criminal investigation.
NEW SECTION:
Section 5. Penalties
1. Any vendor that willfully fails to comply with, or falsifies the records required to be kept by this bill is guilty of a public offense punishable by imprisonment not to exceed one year, and a fine of $1,000.
2. Any manufacturer that fails to comply with the provisions of this section shall be liable for a civil fine of not more than one $1,000 for a first violation, not more than five $5,000 for a second violation, and not more $10,000 for a third and subsequent violation.
3. Any person who willfully destroys, obliterates, or otherwise renders unreadable, theserialization required pursuant to this bill, on any bullet or assembled ammunition ispunishable by imprisonment not to exceed one year, and a fine of $1,000.
NEW SECTION:
Section 6. Funding.
1. Establishing and maintaining the ACD shall be funded by an end-user fee not toexceed [COST NUMBER, ESTIMATED AT $0.005 PER BULLET OR ROUNDOF AMMUNITION].
2. There is hereby established the Coded Ammunition Fund for deposit of the enduserfees described in this section. Moneys in the fund, upon appropriation, shall be available to the [AGENCY] for infrastructure, implementation, operational, enforcement, and future development costs of this chapter.
3. Ammunition manufacturers based within this state may submit a one-time taxcredit application for cost of purchasing ammunition coding equipment.
All applications must be submitted by January 1, 2009.-- END --
NOTE: To view a more detailed version of Ammunition Coding Database legislation that was proposed in other states, visit
http://www.ammunitionaccountability.org/ .
Gordon Thomas Honeywell Governmental Affairs can also provide drafting guidance.
Contact Briahna Taylor at (253) 620-6640 or btaylor@gth-gov.com
and Joyce Hutcheson Gab Creek Farm: Foundation Morgans
http://www.gabcreekfarm.com
Saturday, November 22, 2008
OBAMA SAYS HE WANTS MORE MONEY TO FIX PROBLEMS
U.S. President-elect Barack Obama said on Saturday that he was crafting an aggressive, two-year stimulus plan to revive the troubled economy, warning that swift action was needed to prevent a deep slump and a spiral of falling prices.
"If we don't act swiftly and boldly, most experts now believe that we could lose millions of jobs next year," Obama said in prepared remarks for the weekly Democratic radio and video address.
"We now risk falling into a deflationary spiral that could increase our massive debt even further," he said.
A day after U.S. stock markets rallied on his apparent choice of Timothy Geithner as Treasury secretary, Obama gave a bleak assessment of the economy in his most detailed comments on the subject since winning the Nov. 4 election.
Obama in October called for a $175 billion stimulus measure, but his comments in the radio address on Saturday signaled he was prepared to push for a much larger package, though he did not give a price-tag.
"If we don't act swiftly and boldly, most experts now believe that we could lose millions of jobs next year," Obama said in prepared remarks for the weekly Democratic radio and video address.
"We now risk falling into a deflationary spiral that could increase our massive debt even further," he said.
A day after U.S. stock markets rallied on his apparent choice of Timothy Geithner as Treasury secretary, Obama gave a bleak assessment of the economy in his most detailed comments on the subject since winning the Nov. 4 election.
Obama in October called for a $175 billion stimulus measure, but his comments in the radio address on Saturday signaled he was prepared to push for a much larger package, though he did not give a price-tag.
SYMPATHY, SADNESS & FEAR
SOMEBODY ASKED ABOUT THE INDONESIAN FACET OF THE OBAMA CONTROVERSY IN SIMPLIFIED FORM.
DURING WRITING A COMMENTARY, WHAT EMERGED WAS AN ALMOST GOTHIC SADNESS ABOUT THE CARDS OBAMA WAS DEALT BY LIFE AND HAD TO PLAY.
AND NOW CONTINUES TO PLAY BUT WITH THE SYMPATHY, SADNESS BEING REPLACED BY FEAR OF WHAT HIS MINDSETS AND NARROWING OPTIONS WILL FORCE AS HIS NEW PATH.
Indonesian Aspect Simplified/Editorialized
Obama’s mother remarried an Indonesian Moslem named Soetero.
They moved to Indonesia.
Obama was registered as a student in an Indonesian school - with his religion shown as Moslem
Indonesia did not ALLOW foreigners to enroll in their schools, indicating Obama had to have been an Indoneian national at the time.
Apparently because his step father Soetero adopted him and gave him Indonesian status.
At some point in time later, Obama - apparently named Barry Soetero - returns to Hawaii where he lives with his maternal grandmother.
He moves to New York and lives in a drug infested neighborhood,
Around 1981 he travels to Pakistan (and may have made several trips later with some inference that he was a drug mule).
The MOST IMPORTANT part here is not the drugs but the fact that holders of USA passports were not alllowed to travel to Pakistan in that time period and would have been turned back in Pakistan.
His mother was also there at that time so may have also travelled on a non-USA passport - her own Indonesian one.
However, he used his INDONESIAN passport to go back and forth to Pakistan, where it was readily accepted.
Since Indonesia did not accept dual nationality (till about a few years ago) Obama’s use AT ADULTHOOD of an Indonesian passport is itself a repudiation of any American citizenship he may have falsely claimed.
Including to receive reduced fees to enroll at Columbia as an African-American minority.
In reality Obama is NOT African anything minority since his father, while a Kenyan national was an ARAB not an “African” by BLOOD.
His blood mixture does NOT qualify according to U.S. Federal rules as a minority African-American as his African blood (through a maternal grand mother) does not reach the required 12.5% African blood in his veins. He has just under 7% African bloodline.
His blood is 50% white mother, 43.25 % Arab father and 6.75% African.
Around this time period he also enrolled at Columbia university and has hidden and lost records so that it is not clear if he registered as a foreign student, or falsely as an African-American while he actually had Indonesian nationality. As per his passport.
He cannot produce proof of his registration for at that time compulsory registration for Military Service (Draft) and here too may have used his Indonesian nationality to avoid the AMERICAN draft.
Search of records to find this registration has come up empty, implying he never registered.
While kind hearts may feel sorry and sympathize with this struggling youth trying to survive within the entangled web of his birth vagaries, for which he had no responsibility nor ability to change, leading to all this weaving and bobbing and current implications of ineligibility on his election to the position of president-elect, his foundational upbringing, mind sets and probability of becoming America’s version of Iran’s destructive Khomeini, puts even those kindest of hearts into strong fear and doubt mode.
His current choice of cabinet and top posts to make up for his own lack of experience bodes for a contentious “clusterf**k” administration internally and his own hands-on attitude will probably end up in a forced expansion of dicatorial and controlling mind sets he already has toward the nation and he will increasingly enforce to control an out of hand management experience of a group who have little or no loyalty to him but deeply imbued with enormous self-serving interests of many kinds.
The worst case scenario that could emerge in all these poisonous, swirling clouds of doubt and accusations is that Obama is in fact an ILLEGAL ALIEN according to our immigration laws. Don’t laugh. The framework of his unfortunate background as it is unfolding, could end with this eventual though sad conclusion.
Talk about Constitutional Conflict and possible civil warfare in the offing. Little wonder he wants to build a million person Civil Security Force of brain washed Obamaoists.
His fear is greater than ours.
Friday, November 21, 2008
INTELLIGENCE PREDICTION
By Randall Mikkelsen
WASHINGTON, Nov 20 (Reuters) -
U.S. Economic and political clout will decline over the next two decades and the world will be more dangerous, with food and water scarce and advanced weapons plentiful, U.S. Spy agencies projected on Thursday.
The National Intelligence Council analysis "Global Trends 2025" also said the current financial crisis on Wall Street is just the first phase of a global economic reordering.
The U.S. dollar's role as the world's major currency would weaken to become a "first among equals," the report said. The outlook is intended to inform U.S. President-elect Barack Obama of factors that will influence global events.
It is based on a year-long global survey of experts and trends by U.S. Intelligence analysts."The next 20 years of transition to a new system are fraught with risks," said the report, which was more pessimistic about U.S. Influence and the potential for conflict than the last outlook for 2020.
Thomas Fingar, chairman of the intelligence council and deputy national director of intelligence for analysis, said harmful outcomes were not inevitable.
"It is not beyond the mind of human beings, or political systems, (or) in some cases (the) working of market mechanisms to address and alleviate if not solve these problems," Fingar told reporters. "We could have a better world in 2025."
China and India, following a "state capitalism" economic model, were likely to join the United States atop a multipolar world and compete for influence, the report said.
Russia's potential was less certain, depending on its energy wealth and internal investment. But Iran, Turkey and Indonesia were also seen gaining power.
POTENTIAL FOR CONFLICTA world with multiple power centers has been less stable than one with a single or two rival superpowers, and there was a growing potential for conflict, the report said.
Global warming will be felt, and water, food and energy constraints may fuel conflict over resources."Strategic rivalries are most likely to revolve around trade, investments and technological innovation and acquisition, but we cannot rule out a 19th century-like scenario of arms races, territorial expansion and military rivalries," the report said."
Types of conflict we have not seen for a while -- such as over resources -- could reemerge," it said.Global wealth was seen shifting from the developed West to the energy-rich Gulf States and Russia, and to Asia, the rising center of manufacturing and some service industries.
Global rich-poor disparities would grow, leaving Africa vulnerable to increased instability.A reordering of the world financial system was happening faster than the report's authors envisioned, Fingar said.
Last weekend's Group of 20 summit of advanced and major developing countries in Washington showed work had begun, he said.
A shift away from an oil-based energy system will be underway or complete by 2025. Better renewable technologies such as solar and wind power offer the best opportunity for a quick and low-cost transition, the report said.
There was a greater, but still small, risk of nuclear attack, based on spreading technologies and the weakening of international nonproliferation systems.
If Iran were to acquire nuclear weapons, Fingar said, that could set off an arms race in the Middle East, which is considered in the report as an "arc of instability."
The risk that militant groups would use biological weapons was greater than the risk of nuclear terrorism, the report said.
The appeal of terrorism could decline over the next two decades, particularly if Middle Eastern countries provide productive education and opportunities for their young people, the report said.
But with a growing population, the pool of potential terrorism recruits is likely to be larger, and access to dangerous weapons will rise. (Editing by Vicki Allen)
WASHINGTON, Nov 20 (Reuters) -
U.S. Economic and political clout will decline over the next two decades and the world will be more dangerous, with food and water scarce and advanced weapons plentiful, U.S. Spy agencies projected on Thursday.
The National Intelligence Council analysis "Global Trends 2025" also said the current financial crisis on Wall Street is just the first phase of a global economic reordering.
The U.S. dollar's role as the world's major currency would weaken to become a "first among equals," the report said. The outlook is intended to inform U.S. President-elect Barack Obama of factors that will influence global events.
It is based on a year-long global survey of experts and trends by U.S. Intelligence analysts."The next 20 years of transition to a new system are fraught with risks," said the report, which was more pessimistic about U.S. Influence and the potential for conflict than the last outlook for 2020.
Thomas Fingar, chairman of the intelligence council and deputy national director of intelligence for analysis, said harmful outcomes were not inevitable.
"It is not beyond the mind of human beings, or political systems, (or) in some cases (the) working of market mechanisms to address and alleviate if not solve these problems," Fingar told reporters. "We could have a better world in 2025."
China and India, following a "state capitalism" economic model, were likely to join the United States atop a multipolar world and compete for influence, the report said.
Russia's potential was less certain, depending on its energy wealth and internal investment. But Iran, Turkey and Indonesia were also seen gaining power.
POTENTIAL FOR CONFLICTA world with multiple power centers has been less stable than one with a single or two rival superpowers, and there was a growing potential for conflict, the report said.
Global warming will be felt, and water, food and energy constraints may fuel conflict over resources."Strategic rivalries are most likely to revolve around trade, investments and technological innovation and acquisition, but we cannot rule out a 19th century-like scenario of arms races, territorial expansion and military rivalries," the report said."
Types of conflict we have not seen for a while -- such as over resources -- could reemerge," it said.Global wealth was seen shifting from the developed West to the energy-rich Gulf States and Russia, and to Asia, the rising center of manufacturing and some service industries.
Global rich-poor disparities would grow, leaving Africa vulnerable to increased instability.A reordering of the world financial system was happening faster than the report's authors envisioned, Fingar said.
Last weekend's Group of 20 summit of advanced and major developing countries in Washington showed work had begun, he said.
A shift away from an oil-based energy system will be underway or complete by 2025. Better renewable technologies such as solar and wind power offer the best opportunity for a quick and low-cost transition, the report said.
There was a greater, but still small, risk of nuclear attack, based on spreading technologies and the weakening of international nonproliferation systems.
If Iran were to acquire nuclear weapons, Fingar said, that could set off an arms race in the Middle East, which is considered in the report as an "arc of instability."
The risk that militant groups would use biological weapons was greater than the risk of nuclear terrorism, the report said.
The appeal of terrorism could decline over the next two decades, particularly if Middle Eastern countries provide productive education and opportunities for their young people, the report said.
But with a growing population, the pool of potential terrorism recruits is likely to be larger, and access to dangerous weapons will rise. (Editing by Vicki Allen)
RADIO CALL "APPARENTLY" ELICITS OBAMA'S BIRTH PLACE WAS IN KENYA
A Denver radio station allegedly calls Kenya and claims to speak to someone who represents himself as the "Kenyan Ambassador".
While this call has some interesting aspects, what anyone with diplomatic experience would ask is why call Kenya to talk to the Kenyan Ambassador - presumably to the USA - unless he was on home leave from the Kenyan Embassy in Washington D.C.
CLICK HERE TO GO TO AUDIO (comment on birth place around the 12th minute of the 15 minute audio)
What brings on this kind of audio, real or otherwise and a dozen lawsuits throughout America, including to the Supreme court, rests with Obama's absolute refusal to provide anyone with his also alleged birth certificate, which more likely will prove to be a COLB (Certificate of Live Birth) not a BC (Birth Certificate) which lists a ton of information on it.
Interestingly one of the two Hawaii hospitals claimed as his birthplace was not built until TWO YEARS after his again alleged birth date.
Hopefully the Supreme Court, now deciding whether to look into the matter on December 5th, will help settle this once and for all.
So far lawsuits have been rejected on the status/standing of those bringing them rather than the ACTUAL merits of the complaint or suit, which have yet to be formally addressed.
Another mystifying clue to Obama's mother trying to manipulate the system comes from his younger Indonesian half-sister (Indonesian father), born in Indonesia, which until a year or two ago refused to accept dual citizenshi, nor allow non-Indonesian students in their schools, appears to have a Hawaiian "brith certificate", more probably a COLB not a CB.
Her apparent false registration of Obama in Hawaii was repeated with his VERY definitely NOT Hawaiian born half-sister.
Q.E.D. (quod erat demonstrandum)
While this call has some interesting aspects, what anyone with diplomatic experience would ask is why call Kenya to talk to the Kenyan Ambassador - presumably to the USA - unless he was on home leave from the Kenyan Embassy in Washington D.C.
CLICK HERE TO GO TO AUDIO (comment on birth place around the 12th minute of the 15 minute audio)
What brings on this kind of audio, real or otherwise and a dozen lawsuits throughout America, including to the Supreme court, rests with Obama's absolute refusal to provide anyone with his also alleged birth certificate, which more likely will prove to be a COLB (Certificate of Live Birth) not a BC (Birth Certificate) which lists a ton of information on it.
Interestingly one of the two Hawaii hospitals claimed as his birthplace was not built until TWO YEARS after his again alleged birth date.
Hopefully the Supreme Court, now deciding whether to look into the matter on December 5th, will help settle this once and for all.
So far lawsuits have been rejected on the status/standing of those bringing them rather than the ACTUAL merits of the complaint or suit, which have yet to be formally addressed.
Another mystifying clue to Obama's mother trying to manipulate the system comes from his younger Indonesian half-sister (Indonesian father), born in Indonesia, which until a year or two ago refused to accept dual citizenshi, nor allow non-Indonesian students in their schools, appears to have a Hawaiian "brith certificate", more probably a COLB not a CB.
Her apparent false registration of Obama in Hawaii was repeated with his VERY definitely NOT Hawaiian born half-sister.
Q.E.D. (quod erat demonstrandum)
Thursday, November 20, 2008
ENOUGH FOR ONE NUCLEAR BOMB
Defying the U.N. Security Council, Iran has continued to both enrich uranium and expand its capacity to process even more material, the International Atomic Energy Agency disclosed today.
This thought has not yet hit the radar screen.
The new nuclear material made by Iran - “enough for one bomb”, could in fact POTENTIALLY revitalize the degraded nuclear fuel of anywhere from eight to a dozen nuclear warheads islamic Iran already had on hand, some in nose cones engineered/provided by North Korea on Shahab missiles.
Those can be deployed with far more overall damage than just one “fully charged” nuke. So to speak.
We now wait for the other shoe to eventually drop. Not if but when. Unless Israel “removes the shoe” while Bush is still around. Obama won’t and won’t allow it.
Perfect example of a rock and hard place for everyone involved and many of those around them.
This thought has not yet hit the radar screen.
The new nuclear material made by Iran - “enough for one bomb”, could in fact POTENTIALLY revitalize the degraded nuclear fuel of anywhere from eight to a dozen nuclear warheads islamic Iran already had on hand, some in nose cones engineered/provided by North Korea on Shahab missiles.
Those can be deployed with far more overall damage than just one “fully charged” nuke. So to speak.
We now wait for the other shoe to eventually drop. Not if but when. Unless Israel “removes the shoe” while Bush is still around. Obama won’t and won’t allow it.
Perfect example of a rock and hard place for everyone involved and many of those around them.
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
NEW POSTS
Read excerpts of new articles and links to full stories posted on Terror News, World Views, News Views and Ruthless Roundup - reached via section links in Left Hand Column. ENJOY
And how Obama got elected, A chat with his voters.
http://www.howobamagotelected.com/
AND http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/6378 PORT OF LOS ANGELES SECURITY IN THE HANDS OF THE SON OF CHINA'S PRESIDENT!!!!!!
WHAT ARE WE THINKING? FIRST OBAMA AND NOW THIS?
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
HAWAII JUDGE SETS HEARING ON OBAMA
CLICK ON LINK BELOW
NOTE: IF OBAMA WERE LEGITIMATE, NONE OF THESE LAWSUITS WOULD BE NECESSARY. HE WOULD SIMPLY HAVE PRODUCED HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND SENT EVERYONE HOME WITH THEIR TAILS BETWEEN THEIR LEGS. BUT HE HAS NOT AND SO FAR REFUSES TO DO SO. WHAT IS BEING HIDDEN HERE? SOMETHING MUST BE FOR THIS REFUSAL TO HAVE ANY REASON.
AND WHY ARE HIS COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY DOCUMENTATION AND ATTENDANCE RECORDS ALSO BEING HIDDEN BY HIM. ARE THEY RELATED TO WHAT IS ON HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE - OR RELATED TO DOUBTS THAT HE EVER REGISTERED FOR MILITARY SERVICE AS REQUIRED. DID HE AVOID THE DRAFT AS A "FOREIGN" STUDENT?
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/barack-obama-birth-certificate-hearing-hawaii-judge-sets-hearing-andy-martin-plaintiff-defendants-linda-lingle-dr-chiyome-fukino-november-18-2008/
ALSO listen to THIS Blog Radio on the subject as suggested in the Comment by Ted to this article
http://politicalpistachio.blogspot.com/2008/11/why-is-obamas-birth-certificate-still.html
NOTE: IF OBAMA WERE LEGITIMATE, NONE OF THESE LAWSUITS WOULD BE NECESSARY. HE WOULD SIMPLY HAVE PRODUCED HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND SENT EVERYONE HOME WITH THEIR TAILS BETWEEN THEIR LEGS. BUT HE HAS NOT AND SO FAR REFUSES TO DO SO. WHAT IS BEING HIDDEN HERE? SOMETHING MUST BE FOR THIS REFUSAL TO HAVE ANY REASON.
AND WHY ARE HIS COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY DOCUMENTATION AND ATTENDANCE RECORDS ALSO BEING HIDDEN BY HIM. ARE THEY RELATED TO WHAT IS ON HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE - OR RELATED TO DOUBTS THAT HE EVER REGISTERED FOR MILITARY SERVICE AS REQUIRED. DID HE AVOID THE DRAFT AS A "FOREIGN" STUDENT?
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/10/30/barack-obama-birth-certificate-hearing-hawaii-judge-sets-hearing-andy-martin-plaintiff-defendants-linda-lingle-dr-chiyome-fukino-november-18-2008/
ALSO listen to THIS Blog Radio on the subject as suggested in the Comment by Ted to this article
http://politicalpistachio.blogspot.com/2008/11/why-is-obamas-birth-certificate-still.html
Monday, November 17, 2008
WHO AM I?
I was raised in one country but my father was born in another.
I was not his only child. He fathered several children with a number of women.
I became very close to my mother because my father showed little interest in me.
Then my mother died at an early age from cancer.
Later in life, questions arose over my real name.
My birth records were sketchy and no one was able to produce a reliable birth certificate.
I grew up practicing one faith, but converted to Christianity because it was widely accepted in my country.
But, I practiced non-traditional beliefs and did not follow mainstream Christianity.
I worked and lived among lower-class people as a young adult, before I decided it was time to get serious about my life. I embarked on a new career in politics.
I wrote a book about my struggles growing up. It was clear to those who read my memoirs that I had difficulties accepting that my father abandoned me as a child.
I became active in local politics when I was in my 30s and then burst onto the scene as a candidate for national office when I was in my 40s. I had a virtually non-existent resume, very little work history, and no experience in leading a single organization.
Yet I was a powerful speaker who managed to draw incredibly large crowds during my public appearances. At first, my political campaign focused on my country's foreign policy.
I was critical of my country in the last war. But what launched my rise to national prominence were my views on the country's economy. I had a plan on how we could do better.
I knew which group was responsible for getting us into this mess. I made promises and alliances to promote myself and my agendas.
Mine was a people's campaign. I was the surprise candidate because I emerged from outside the traditional path of politics and was able to gain widespread popular support.
I offered the people the hope that together we could change our country and the world.
I spoke on behalf of the downtrodden including persecuted minorities such as Jews, but my actual views were not widely known until after I became my nation's leader.
However, anyone could have easily learned what I really believed if they had simply read my writings and examined those people I associated with.
But they did not.
Then I became the most powerful man in the world. And the world learned the truth. Who am I?
I am NOT Obama, I am......
I am......
Adolph HItler
and
Applaud his Civil Defense Force
along the line
of
My Hitler Youth Corps
Sunday, November 16, 2008
TASTE OF THE USSA - UNITED SOCIALIST STATES OF AMERICA
The man was ACTUALLY sentenced to 93 days in prison because he didn’t sit down quickly enough for the judge.
See video below
The judge entered the room and the man stood.
The judge then told those in the room to be seated, at which point the man remained standing for a couple of seconds, looked behind him for his seat, then began to sit down.
At this point his name was called so he stood up again.
Upon doing this the judge started screaming at him to sit, so he did.
Then the judge ordered him to be taken into custody and removed from the courtroom.
The “trial” took place in a closed courtroom where the man was sentenced to 3 days for the original ticket he received, and 90 days for contempt of court. Kangaroo court all the way.
The writer of the article below got it backwards. Except the miscarraige of justice with a vengeance!
90 days in prison for refusing to stand
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal" says the Declaration of Independence, a document that asserted freedom and triggered a war. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal" is a concept taught in American schools as a fundamental truth that all people are deserving of respect and life and prosperity.
Why then is Ian Freeman in prison for the next 100 days? Because he refused to stand for his equal, another man. He refused to call him 'honor' and this upset the man calling himself "Judge".
Ian Freeman, host of the internationally syndicated radio show Free Talk Live and fellow Free State Project member appeared at court today in Keene, New Hampshire.
As the owner of a property in Keene he has been charged with some sort of code violation for his tenants having a couch in the yard they rent from Ian. Several weeks ago a person claiming to be "an official" from "City of Keene" left a piece of paper demanding money and the removal of the couch.
Ian met with the so-called official to ask if any of his neighbors had actually complained about the couch and was told that a female neighbor had filed a complaint.
When Ian asked to speak with her, he was told that wouldn't happen.In the United States of America, there is a very basic right enshrined in the Constitution, the right to confront your accuser.
I hold no reverence for this document - it's not anything I agree to or am party to - but supposedly the people calling themselves "government" have agreed to be bound by it.
Ian presented the court officials with a response. He was not against removing the couch - a responsible neighbor takes note of the complaints of his neighbor. He just wanted to talk with the woman who filed the complaint, to find out what offended her about how his property was, and he'd then remove it if it still bothered her.
A very adult-like thing to do.The court refused, and instead initiated a trial.Today, Ian appeared at their trial and intended only on calling the damaged person making a complaint against him. He never got that far, it seems.
In keeping with the doctrine of "all men created equal", Ian Freeman refused to stand for the man called "Judge". It would be considered rude to refuse a hand extended to you in greeting, yet this man called "Judge" did not greet Ian by standing.
Instead, he decided that Ian's refusal to stand was somehow and offense, and then proceeded to instruct some other men to arrest him. They ushered him off to a separate room for the supposed "trial".
In addition to being able to confront your accuser, in America there's supposedly a right to a public trial. This is so the public can show outrage when the government people become overly aggressive and start hurting people. As is so common in New Hampshire, Ian did in fact have public support. Several liberty activists attended the government people's trial over this matter.
Ian mentioned yesterday [MP3] that those attendees are a huge source of motivation and strength when confronting the aggressive government people, and today they made a very clear move to separate the public from the court railroading that would follow.
In this private back room, the man called "Judge" convicted Ian of three counts of "contempt of court" (why shouldn't an ethical person be contemptuous of men using violence and threats to tell other men what they're allowed to store their property?) and sentenced him to 90 days in prison with fines with an additional 10 days in the cage for refusal to give the government people some of his money.
Welcome to the United Socialist States of America.
The government people own your property. They dictate to you what you can do on your own land. You no longer have to hurt someone to have the government people turn against and hurt you. You have no right to confront your accuser. There no longer need even be an accuser, no injured party. You have no right to a public trial. "We will use force against you" the government people are saying "if you don't obey us."
Indeed, it wasn't even "obeying" they reacted to. No, the aggression they commit was triggered by what they perceive as an insult or as the man calling himself "Judge" said for "making a mockery of this proceeding".
See video below
The judge entered the room and the man stood.
The judge then told those in the room to be seated, at which point the man remained standing for a couple of seconds, looked behind him for his seat, then began to sit down.
At this point his name was called so he stood up again.
Upon doing this the judge started screaming at him to sit, so he did.
Then the judge ordered him to be taken into custody and removed from the courtroom.
The “trial” took place in a closed courtroom where the man was sentenced to 3 days for the original ticket he received, and 90 days for contempt of court. Kangaroo court all the way.
The writer of the article below got it backwards. Except the miscarraige of justice with a vengeance!
90 days in prison for refusing to stand
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal" says the Declaration of Independence, a document that asserted freedom and triggered a war. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal" is a concept taught in American schools as a fundamental truth that all people are deserving of respect and life and prosperity.
Why then is Ian Freeman in prison for the next 100 days? Because he refused to stand for his equal, another man. He refused to call him 'honor' and this upset the man calling himself "Judge".
Ian Freeman, host of the internationally syndicated radio show Free Talk Live and fellow Free State Project member appeared at court today in Keene, New Hampshire.
As the owner of a property in Keene he has been charged with some sort of code violation for his tenants having a couch in the yard they rent from Ian. Several weeks ago a person claiming to be "an official" from "City of Keene" left a piece of paper demanding money and the removal of the couch.
Ian met with the so-called official to ask if any of his neighbors had actually complained about the couch and was told that a female neighbor had filed a complaint.
When Ian asked to speak with her, he was told that wouldn't happen.In the United States of America, there is a very basic right enshrined in the Constitution, the right to confront your accuser.
I hold no reverence for this document - it's not anything I agree to or am party to - but supposedly the people calling themselves "government" have agreed to be bound by it.
Ian presented the court officials with a response. He was not against removing the couch - a responsible neighbor takes note of the complaints of his neighbor. He just wanted to talk with the woman who filed the complaint, to find out what offended her about how his property was, and he'd then remove it if it still bothered her.
A very adult-like thing to do.The court refused, and instead initiated a trial.Today, Ian appeared at their trial and intended only on calling the damaged person making a complaint against him. He never got that far, it seems.
In keeping with the doctrine of "all men created equal", Ian Freeman refused to stand for the man called "Judge". It would be considered rude to refuse a hand extended to you in greeting, yet this man called "Judge" did not greet Ian by standing.
Instead, he decided that Ian's refusal to stand was somehow and offense, and then proceeded to instruct some other men to arrest him. They ushered him off to a separate room for the supposed "trial".
In addition to being able to confront your accuser, in America there's supposedly a right to a public trial. This is so the public can show outrage when the government people become overly aggressive and start hurting people. As is so common in New Hampshire, Ian did in fact have public support. Several liberty activists attended the government people's trial over this matter.
Ian mentioned yesterday [MP3] that those attendees are a huge source of motivation and strength when confronting the aggressive government people, and today they made a very clear move to separate the public from the court railroading that would follow.
In this private back room, the man called "Judge" convicted Ian of three counts of "contempt of court" (why shouldn't an ethical person be contemptuous of men using violence and threats to tell other men what they're allowed to store their property?) and sentenced him to 90 days in prison with fines with an additional 10 days in the cage for refusal to give the government people some of his money.
Welcome to the United Socialist States of America.
The government people own your property. They dictate to you what you can do on your own land. You no longer have to hurt someone to have the government people turn against and hurt you. You have no right to confront your accuser. There no longer need even be an accuser, no injured party. You have no right to a public trial. "We will use force against you" the government people are saying "if you don't obey us."
Indeed, it wasn't even "obeying" they reacted to. No, the aggression they commit was triggered by what they perceive as an insult or as the man calling himself "Judge" said for "making a mockery of this proceeding".
Saturday, November 15, 2008
TOO LATE! - YOU WILL OBEY - AND BE DAMNED
SAD COMMENTARY
(Freeper - "Enterprise")
So you’re going to reorganize for 2010? And then in 2012, with a rejuvenated party you’re going to get behind Sarah Palin and make another run at the White House?
Is that what you’re thinking? Well FORGET it! You’ve been checkmated and you will NEVER AGAIN see a Republican President! Here’s why and how!
In 2010 ACORN will be funded to the tune of a couple of billion dollars.
They will fan out across the nation to fix the elections via massive fraud. Lots more Mickey Mouse’s will register and vote.
And by then, a sycophant Democrat A.G. will be appointed and the Federal Courts will be packed with sycophant judges.
More Republican Senators and Republican House members will be defeated, giving a plus 60 advantage in the Senate and a much larger margin in the House. (already on the current horizon).
You cry foul because the fraud is so obvious. “There’s cheating and fraud” you say to the Democrat A.G., “I don’t see any cheating and fraud” says” the A.G.
“There’s cheating and fraud” you cry to the federal courts. “We don’t see any cheating and fraud” say the courts.
(At this time, the Republican party can be officially announced as dead, and its spirit will be withdrawn by God.)
And ACORN is busy busy busy electing Obama sympathetic State legislators.
“Why?,” you ask? Read on.
In 2012 you rally behind Sarah Palin. ACORN once again fans out across the nation and starts the massive voter registration fraud and voting booth fraud again.
Only this time, they are assisted by tens of thousands of “volunteers” from the MILLION PERSON civilian defense organization.
(The organization actually serves a multi purpose. It trains the people for national disasters, and it gives the administration 90 days to heavily indoctrinate people aged 18 - 25 into Obammunism. SEE VIDEO BELOW
Also it provides lot of campaign workers and an endless supply of young female sex toys to the Obammunists in power, at all levels, and provides an endless supply of young males who will be harassed and intimidated into providing sex to the homosexual indoctrinators.
And all those gooey eyed single females who voted for Obama because they view the Government as a father figure get a man! He might be a black panther, or a non English speaking comrade Venezuelan but hey, he’s MALE!)
But I digress. Sarah Palin is defeated. More Republican Senators and Republican House members are defeated. “What fraud?” says the Democrat A.G. “What fraud?” say the Federal judges.
And ACORN is busy, busy, busy, electing Obama sympathetic State legislators. Why?,” you ask? Read on.
It’s 2014 and more of the same.
After the “election” there might be one or two Republicans left in the Senate, and a handful left in the House. By now, no one bothers to complain to the Democrat A.G. or the Federal Courts.
Finally, Acorn finishes putting enough Obama friendly State legislators in power. “But why did they bother?,” you say?
By 2014, Obama has only two years left in power, but he’s not ready to call it quits. So, he tells his Democrat Senate and House that he wants the Constitution changed so he can run again. (AS DID THE NEW YORK MAYOR ON A STATE LEVEL)
In a breathtakingly short period of time, the House and Senate approve a change to the Constitution.
He then tells the State Legislators to approve the change.
About 45 of the States approve the change in record time, and Obama proceeds to a third term, then a fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth.
Finally, in the fullness of time, he steps down, and hands the reigns of power over to a daughter. There is no longer any need for elections.
Thus begins the reigns of the modern Pharaohs.
The dictators of the earth in America, Russia, and Asia have unbreakable iron grips on their slave populations, and prison camps are vast with people working to do the will of their leaders.
In the fullness of time, the empires are finally broken by natural disasters and people struggle to survive as best they can by hunting and gathering.
Civilizations form again AS SPACE TRAVEL EVOLVES, and in 10,000 years CITIZENS OF OTHER PLANET SETTLEMENTS WHO FLED PLANET EARTH, begin thinking and speaking of things like “One Nation, under God” and speak of divine ideas like religious, economic, and political liberty, along with a new concept: “the consent of the governed.”
God will hear them and send back the spirit of the Republican Party. The party of Freedom and graciousness is reborn.
Of course Satan will also hear the men and he will send back the Spirit if the Democrat party. The party of slavery and treachery is also reborn and the two parties will once again challenge each other ACROSS GALAXIES for a few hundred years.
Perhaps at one time men of good conscience could have stopped Obama. But they didn’t.
The Eyeblast.tv video about the Obama Civilian Security forces that was below has been pulled, so a large empty space is left as a memorial to censorship by the incoming Administration before it even gets into the White House but is already "in power".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)