Search This Blog

Saturday, May 27, 2006

DREAM LAPTOP - WOW!


It took me a year to set aside the money (they are not so expensive, my discretionary income is very limited) to get one of these but I have placed my order.

RegimechangeIran.com also bought their laptop from Portable One and are delighted with the computer and the service. Their slightly older MX model has an 8-hour battery capability.

I happily recommend something to others, which I have bought for myself. Specially as I used to be in the computer field and know something about them.

My current Desktop replacement laptop - with a desktop not mobile - 2.8GHz CPU is fast but weighs close to 12 lbs. and it was truly a "desktop" unit - not really a portable one - except technically speaking, I could move it around and operate on battery (some 90 minutes at best).

Because of a limited budget, I spent days and days going to computer stores, Office Depot, Staples, even Costco, looking at every model they had from a variety of manufacturers. Nothing came close to matching quality, useful or essential engineering and value for your money.

CLICK on the article TITLE to go to their site for more information. Check out the link to their PDF file where it states to "click here" for more information.

And no, I do not work for them nor do I get a commission. the promotion is of my own volition to share finding a good - no, a great - item.

***********************

Portable One's MXA8JM reflects a team effort with Asus to offer the world’s first desktop replacement solution in a thin & light laptop with a perfect blend of power and mobility. And other appreciated goodies.

Only 5 pounds light and just over one inch thin, this mobile powerhouse redefines the standard for portable computers.

The magnificent 14" Ultra Viewing Angle (UVA) widescreen display can be optionally ordered as a "TrioView Transflective" - for visibility under direct sunlight so you can work outside without all that squinting and shielding the screen with your body.

Alternatively, thus finish your report by the poolside or on a jobsite.

The built-in Video Conferencing Web Camera has motion-detecting security and works with the High Definition Audio with surround sound.

An already excellent 512 MB NVidia GeForce Go7600 video graphics card is user upgradeable - should the desire arise.

The CPU can also be retroactively upgraded if you later wish to boost your unit to a higher level.

This Intel Core Duo T2400 engineering marvel is the optimum machine with special attention to heat dissipation through High-Xchange efficiency copper molding heat sink with heat pipes and Arctic Silver 5 (CPU & GPU).

And a shock mounted hard drive.

The basic model has the following specifications:

Intel Core Duo T2400 1.83GHz 2MB L2 Cache, 667FSB (upgradeable to 2.0 or 2.16GHz - 667MHz bus)

Mobile Intel 945 PM Express Chipset

Two Memory sockets with 2 x 512MB for a standard 1GB
Dual Channel DDR2 PC5300 667MHz (upgradeable to 2GB).

With this in mind, for a small extra cost, the unit can be ordered with a single 1GB memory chip for later increase to 2GB.

14.1" Ultra Viewing Angle (UVA) 160° WXGA LCD (1280x800)

(Optional TrioView Transflective (UVA) 160° WXGA LCD for optimum viewing under direct sunlight

NVidia GeForce Go7600 512MB VRAM (Upgradeable)

100GB Shock Mounted 5400RPM Hard Drive (standard) with optional choices of other sizes and other speeds.

Dual Layer Multi Format DVD±RW Super Multi Drive

Built-in 1.3 Mega-Pixel web camera w/motion detection security

5 USB 2.0 Ports and one Firewire,

S-Video, Express Card, VGA & DVI Ports

SD/MMC/MS/MS PRO Card Reader

Integrated 10/1000 Gigabit LAN

Integrated Intel Tri-Mode 802.11a+b/g Wireless LAN
with an ON/OFF switch.

Integrated Bluetooth V2.0 EDR PAN with an ON/OFF switch

Integrated Global 56K Modem

Built-in Touchpad pointing device w/scroll & lock function

High-Xchange efficiency copper molding heat sink with heat pipes and Arctic Silver 5 (CPU & GPU)

Built-in High Definition Audio w/Surround Sound

Embedded Trusted Platform Module Security (TPM 1.2)

Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition (Optional Windows XP Professional w/VCOM6 & P1 Recovery System). Unlike with other manufacturers you are not stuck with their choice of Windows provided.

Only weighs 5.25 pounds w/6 Cell Battery - life up to 4-hours as per Ziff Davis - (8-cell extended batteries coming soon).

With roaming wireless use protection considerations to keep in mind, the award winning VCOM SystemSuite software package, PC Worlds Best of Utility Suite, that comes with every Portable One laptop system purchased, offers special security.

You get all of VCOMs maintenance and management software in a single package -- including Fix Utilities, Anti-Virus, Anti-Spam, Firewall, Recovery Commander and much more, all preloaded on your new Portable One system.

Free 2-day shipping and a Slimline carrying case

To ensure your new Portable One reaches you in perfect working condition, multiple burn-in progressions on each and every component are done to ensure the system performs optimally when you take delivery of it.

As a result you should allow a week for delivery. Two weeks if you order the optional "sunlight" display screen.

These special screens are ordered and checked out by Portable One for pixel quality and if approved, then returned to be attached to the units by the display provider to ensure best quality integration.

And then there is that all important customer service satisfaction. You can call and get a live person at Portable One to answer your questions without going through hoops.

CUSTOMER SERVICE RATINGS: (0-10, ten being best)
(Outside Evaluation)

7.86 - Pricing of Products and Services
9.58 - Likelihood of Future Purchases
8.75 - Shipping and Packaging
9.50 - Customer Service
10.0 - Return or Replacement

The fact that I went for one of these with my limited resources but knowledge of computers, speaks volumes all by itself.

GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

Model #: MXA8JM

Processor & Cache
• Intel Core Duo (Yonah) with 2MB L2 cache
• Speed 1.83GHz~2.16GHz 667MHz Bus
• Support Power4 Gear 2 (Frequency limited + throttle)
Chipset
• Mobile Intel 945 PM Express Chipset

Main Memory
• 2 x Memory sockets for expansion up to 2GB currently (4GB MAX)
• 1GB 2 x 512MB Dual Channel DDR2 standard
• DDR2 PC5300 667MHz Dual Channel

Display
• 14.1” Ultra Viewing Angle (UVA) TFT, WXGA (1280 x 800) Enhanced Display
(Optional TrioView Transflective Display for optimal viewing under all lighting
conditions)

Graphics & Video Module
• NVidia GeForce Go7600 512MB

Interface Slots
• 1 x VGA port/Mini D-sub 15-pin for external monitor
• 1 x Headphone-out jack (SPDIF)
• 1 x Microphone-in jack
• 1 x RJ11 Modem jack for phone line
• 1 x RJ45 LAN Jack for LAN insert
• 5 x USB 2.0 ports, 1x IEEE 1394 port
• 1 x TV Out (S-Video composite)
• 1 x Express Card
• 1 x SIR-115.2Kbps supported
• 1 x Infrared Port
• 1 x DVI Port

Card Reader
SD/MMC/MS/MS PRO 0.35 /

Camera
1.3 mega-Pixel web-cam

Hard Disk Drive
• 2.5” 9.5mm IDE HDD / HGST 5K100/7K100 Series
• Shock mounted 60GB 7200RPM, 80GB 7200RPM & 100GB (5400RPM & 7200RPM)

Optical Disk Drive
• DVD±RW Super Multi-Drive

Network Connectivity


• Integrated Wi-Fi® and WPA Certified wireless Intel® 802.11a/b/g
• Network Connection (Tri-mode 802.11a/b/g); ON/OFF switch; Wi-Fi Protected
Access™ and CCX Certified
• Integrated MDC Fax/MODEM
• Integrated 2.0+EDR Bluetooth; ON/OFF switch
• Multinational 56K V.90 MDC Fax/ Modem
• 10/100/1000 Gigabit Base-TX Ethernet

LED Status Indicator
• Power-on/Suspend
• Battery Charging/full/low
• Storage device access
• Capital / Scroll / Number Lock
• Bluetooth Indicator
• Wireless indicator

Keyboard / Instant Keys
• Standard keyboard with 88/89 Keys US English
• Instant keys (Bluetooth, Wireless, Email, Internet, P4Gear, Touchpad-lock)

Function Keys
Fn+F1 Suspend switch
Fn+F2 BT/ Wireless switch
Fn+F4 Save to Hard-disk
Fn+F5 Brightness down
Fn+F6 Brightness up
Fn+F7 LCD on/off
Fn+F8 LCD/CRT switch display
Fn+F10 Volume on/mute
Fn+F11 Volume down
Fn+F12 Volume up

Audio
• Built-in Intel® High Definition Audio compliant audio chip
• Built-in speaker and microphone
• Built-in stereo speakers and microphone.
• Video Conferencing Camera Microphone

Battery Pack & Life
• 6 cell, 3200mAh/4800mAh, 35/53Whrs
• Battery life up to 4hrs (Ziff Davis)
• Charging time, 2.5 hrs Quick charge 90% (Power off) /4hrs (Power on)
• Battery low warning under Windows environment
• Engages Save-To-Disk mode automatically if less than 5%

AC Adapter
• Output: 19V DC, 3.42A, 90W
• Input: 100~240V AC, 50/60Hz universal

Pointing Device
• Built-in touchpad w/scroll function
• Supports touchpad-lock function

Heat Dissipation
• 25W thermal envelop
• High-exchange efficiency copper molding heat sink with heat pipes
• Temperature-controlled multi rotating speed cooling fan to prevent noise with
“Flux Tunnel Routing” & Fan fail warning
• Artic Silver 5 Thermal Compounds (CPU & GPU)

Dimension / Weight
• 13 inch (wide) x 9.64 inch (depth) x 1.3~1.45 inch (height)
• 5.25lbs w/ CPU, 2.5” Hard Drive, Main Battery & Dual Layer Optical Drive

Security
• Kensington Lock hole
• BIOS setup, Power on HDD user password protection and security lock

Pre-installed S/W Utilities
Portable One Built or modified for Win XP:
• E-mail Incoming: E-mail checking and in-box indicator
• Power4Gear: Pre-defined power saving theme
• HotKey: support instant key function defined
• Portable One Screen Saver & Wallpapers
• Shipment bundle S/W:

Drivers & Applications
P1 Recovery System (XPP Only)
MS Works or MS Office (optional)
• Cyberlink PowerDVD
• VCOM System Suite Professional 6 includes: Fix Utilities, NetDefense Firewall,
Virus Scanner Pro, Anti-Spyware Scan ProEasy Uninstall, BootRepair, SecurErase,
Atomic Clock Sync and bonus software including PowerDesk,
Recovery Commander, Mail Washer Anti Spam & GhostSurf Privacy Control



Thursday, May 25, 2006

THANK YOU VISITORS

More and more visitors from all over the world, including Iran, are visiting this young site and often spend an hour or more reading the articles.

My writing and posting has tended to be sporadic as time permitted but I have articles in the works for the Home Page where I post the longer articles/analyses.

As well as a ton of collected newsworthy information that I shall be adding to the Latest News Briefs (link in the left hand column). Please always check there, too, when you visit. I plan to increasingly add videos and graphics fairly regularly to the two sites (again links in the left hand columnn)

Please be patient and drop by often - as some of you do. I try to earn a living in an irregular hours "day job" and also write articles - as well as polishing/editing some screenplays I have written.

Four good ones on hand: a political action adventure addressing some current situations, a high concept girl and dog in Beverly Hills story, another action drama based on an accidental miracle oil additive and a satyrical romantic comedy on a strange Pacific Island. Also a trilogy covering 3,000 years of mankind called "History of the Future" skeletoned but not yet fleshed out.

Please pass on this site to your friends and if you have a website, blog or have a friend who does, I would apreciate you sending on the HTML code for the the graphic link illustrated below.

With my limited HTML knowledge, to make the needed code to reproduce here instead of creating or showing a second "eye" link I have had to remove a couple of small items:

1. The first line should be 'center' with a '<' and '>' at either end of the word.

2. There should be a '<' immediately before the next letter 'a'

3. There should be a '<' right before 'img' and the space after the previous text deleted

4. The space right after the '<' before the '/' of the final 'center' needs to be deleted.

<>
a href="http://www.antimullah.com"> img alt="AntiMullah.com" src="http://static.flickr.com/51/143831279_300345183b.jpg?v=0" border="0" />< /center>

This results in this link:

AntiMullah.com


Wednesday, May 10, 2006

THE OIL STORY - REVISITED

CAN OIL BECOME THE NEW RESERVE "CURRENCY"

& DESTROY THE U.S. DOLLAR?

Will Iran accelerate the process?


The simple questions require complex thought with a variety of factors all pulling at the world's tapestry - along myriad threads of the weave and waft. The follow-up question becomes "will it really matter?" The question arises from Iran's announcement a year ago that an Iran Oil Bourse – IOB (Exchange) would be operational by March 2006 and trade in crude oil, refined petroleum products and petrochemicals, making Iran the hub of oil deals for the region.

Experts from the International Petroleum Exchange (IPE) and New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) have apparently confirmed the feasibility of the project. Since Dubai, a member of the United Arab Emirates structure in the Persian Gulf has tried and so far failed to create a similar Exchange, does this project really matter?

Did hurricane Katrina matter? As one erudite thinker stated "a boom and modern renewal disaster inevitably follows for the distressed region. There has always been a silver lining". But what if several Katrinas with wider paths, hit at around the same time, reaching much, much farther inland, all the way up America? Could she handle it? Hurricane Katrina's current visuals and reporting on TV provide an easy mental backdrop for what could happen in a more extensive natural or man-made disaster – including a financial disaster similar to the Great American Depression of the 1920s and 1930s. Memories of the recent Asian Tsunami devastation notch the picture closer to what might happen.

With any major change or upheaval, created by Nature or by man, the environmental and political circumstances and the people involved create the results passed on to their citizens or globally. Hopeless and destitute people, faced with no financial future they could handle, jumped off buildings in the Great Depression. In New Orleans, some police officers committed suicide or handed in their badges when faced with a choice of first looking after their own families or helping others. The human factor plays a key role in how events transpire.

As with Katrina, where pundits had warned for decades of the consequences of the breaching of the levies and flooding of New Orleans, on the highest economic levels, top of the field experts like Warren Buffet, George Soros and a variety of topnotch think tanks all currently warn of an impending crash of the U.S. Dollar. Even former U.S. Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker has stated that he estimated a dollar crash in the next five years to have a 75% likelihood.

Buffet and Soros have put billions of dollars at risk toward being right about their prediction, not just words. In addition, in his bet against the dollar, Soros recently took a beating when the dollar suddenly shot up over the Euro in what most market experts describe as a short-lived blip and not a trend. Yet he still bets "against" the dollar.

Something about currencies must matter relative to the Iranian Oil Exchange coming into existence when Heydar Mostakhdemin-Hosseini of Iran's Stock Exchange Council moved on September 7th, 2005, to calm global fears about this Exchange dealing in Euros rather than Dollars. He tried to smooth out the new President Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad's bombshell statement of his intent to deal oil in Euros as well as creating huge oil and natural gas barter deals with China, India and other growing users of petroleum products. And diverting Iranian oil sold to Japan and sending it to China instead.

Because no immediate alternative exists to the dollar as the worldwide reserve currency, common wisdom of economists, relative to currency market values, has been to let matters alone as they "always self-correct" and absorb fluctuations. While Soros can be accused of manipulating the currency market for his own profit, he takes strong issue with the above laissez-faire approach, though it might serve him well.

Commonsensical self-interest by the world economies to maintain a stable dollar and protect global trade and commodity markets – and until recently a relatively low price of oil – has combined to keep the dollar in its position of primary reserve currency. The August 2005 takeover of the Islamic government in Iran by fundamentalist military people, which some call the "third" revolution, meaning not by students or Reformists but by the Revolutionary Guard, skews potential Iranian activity and methods away from anything resembling common sense.

A glut of dollar holdings by Central Banks and among Asian lenders plus the current low interest rate offered to investor/lenders by the USA has put the dollar in jeopardy for some time. Including, potentially, by some inexperienced Third World central bank employee, who seeing an over stock of dollars in the bank's currency portfolio, decides to diversify his holdings.

That imaginary person then puts several billion dollars on the market and triggers a panic sell-off by everyone else – similar to a run on a bank - because the first seller will receive full current value, the later ones will be lucky not to lose bankrupting fortunes. Unless, like Soros, you bet against the dollar. A twitching finger on currency's hair-trigger can shoot down the dollar without any purposeful ill intent. Most estimates place the likely drop at a rapid 50% loss in value for a presently 40% overvalued Dollar.

Not too long ago, a mid-level official of the Korean Central bank casually mentioned currency "diversification" at an obscure lunch. The US Stock Market fell by 100 points in 15 minutes, because of an implied desire for Korea to decrease its dollar holdings. What would the drop have been had he actually sold dollars?


When Long Term Capital Management, a hedge fund of derivatives – something fully understood by probably less than half a dozen people in the world – failed, US Federal Reserve Chairman, Alan Greenspan had to help bail it out to save the dollar and the US economy. This fund had Nobel Prize winning economists writing their trading algorithms and top-drawer traders involved and still went down in flames. What about the expertise level of other hedge funds trading daily in the USA - approaching some 8,000 in number?

About $6,000 Billion worth of derivatives (easier to conceptualize as "huge" instead of a mere "six trillion"), trade on the international market – daily - so the already built-in prospect of disaster surpasses all possible safety factors. Compare this daily amount to the annual USA national Budget of approximately $2,350 Billion (2.35 trillion) in expenditures and $1,900 Billion (less than two trillion) of revenues.

The deficit between revenue and expenditure amounts automatically endangers the value of the dollar as we borrow the difference by selling Treasury Bonds and contract other loan instruments. Moreover, we pay interest on the loans. Most pundits encourage people not to worry, despite the teeter-tottering position of the dollar, since compensating factors tend to mitigate or diminish the dangers, even in an artificially stable profile. Into this at best "delicately balanced" economical environment, introduce an ever more openly hostile Iran with a new President, Ahmadi-Nejad at the helm, whose view of the world and Islam and the West differs from what we have preciously faced, uncomfortable as it was with the Ayatollahs, except during the time of direct rule by Khomeini himself.

Among the forces in play in a potential change of the global dollar status are the psychologies or personalities of key players. Their perception of the best interests of their countries – as felt by them - not as we hope and wish them to perceive matters. An outline encapsulation of Ahmadi-Nejad's almost certain inner character and psychology would offer the following important input into analysis:

1. Coming from the humblest of beginnings and extreme poverty in Iran, presently an income of less than a dollar a day for much of the country, he would barely have accumulated, even today, an objective economical overview of national Iranian matters let alone international ones – including the connectivity and interaction of the global societies and economy.

2. He was born into poor circumstances at a time when prosperity and freedom to thrive were rampant under the late Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Growing up in his personally deprived environment, the general cultural and fervent religious mindsets and traditions of the poorer classes in Iran would definitely influence his formative childhood years and youth. Including the anti-Shah sentiments of the clergy and bazaar merchants, during his mid-teens, bringing Ayatollah Rouhallah (Spirit of Allah) Khomeini to power.

3. His lifestyle in his early years would be minimalist. His humble abode may not have had piped water nor an indoor toilet. Most likely, the family, neighbors and equals, would temporarily spread a tablecloth on the floor for meals, drink out of a communal bowl, eat with their hands, using unleavened bread to scoop up food instead of utensils and sleep on the floor, rolling up the bedding against the walls in the morning to make room for family activity. They would bathe and change their underwear once a week, usually on Thursdays, when men were encouraged to perform their sexual duties to their wives.

Vast majorities of the poorer and provincial families in Iran still live like this and the life style descriptions illustrate the quantum leap needed for the new President – or the Iranian population - to relate to Western ways and thoughts. The world still pictures Iranians based on whom they meet in their countries, usually refugees from the Islamic takeover or from the prior, more modernized representatives or citizens of Iran at the time of the late Shah.

The Mullahs themselves come from the same lower class social and lifestyle origins and their psychology has emanated from there, too. Until stolen riches during the past quarter of a century of corruption turned them into an "uneducated, uncultured upper class" living in mansions and palaces, instead of the hovels from which, for the most part, they originated.

4. When Khomeini took over in Iran, he ordered desks and chairs to be removed form government offices – since if he had sat all his life on the floor on a cushion so could his government; obviously finding an ardent follower in teen-age Ahmadi-Nejad, who still holds Khomeini up as his hero and philosophical guide.

5. Khomeini's worldview of Islam governing and dominating the world autocratically and dictatorially clearly appeals to the new President as evidenced by a recent comment that "Ayatollah Khomeini did not create a revolution to bring Democracy". He appears to have been comfortable with Khomeini's statement in early days that there was no need for a Ministry of Justice. "Anyone who opposes me (Khomeini) opposes Allah and must be killed on the spot. So why complicate everything with any other system of law or justice except what I find and personally interpret in the Koran?"

6. Ahmadi-Nejad's choice of a Spartan, not highly paid, military career filled with Islamic prayer and rhetoric would point to an autocratic "give and take orders" mindset without too much collateral reasoning and his studies at the Institute of Science would also tend toward a rigid thought process of science.

7. His resentment of wealth would make him a true populist, angered by the rich, prosperous at the time of the Shah, leaving him loyal to his religious mentor, Khomeini's "sit on the floor" ideals. Resentment increased after the revolution at seeing the ongoing corruption of the Ayatollahs in power and their claws digging into all revenue channels.

8. To give him his due, the new President proved himself a reasonably good manager as Mayor of Tehran, the highest position of responsibility he held in government other than whatever he did within his military environment. The new mayor, however, describes residents of Tehran, the capital city, as "not living here, just enduring it".


Nevertheless, coupled to a Napoleonic complex likely to flourish in this man of short stature, the prospect of his having a good grasp of or even a desire to understand the rest of the world is slim. After all, foreigners are infidels and other than enemies to destroy have nothing worthwhile for him to emulate. Persians explain the complex of short men by warning that they are the same height as all of us but the rest is hidden underground and a hidden danger.

Personal characteristics become an imperative consideration when evaluating Iran's forthcoming role in oil and the global economy through implementation of the new oil exchange. We tend to think of others as generally similar to ourselves and wrongly start our analytical minds from there, failing to see underlying reasons for otherwise unbelievable or inexplicable actions and thought processes.

Iran's ability – beyond intense philosophical hostility - to influence or trigger a sharp decline or total depression of the world's economy and crashing it around everyone's ears, has more of a catalytic nature than a powerful proactive one, taking advantage of pre-existing physical and psychological factors, such as:

1. The ongoing vulnerability of the dollar as the world's prime reserve currency, noting how easily a sudden swing or change could devalue it.

2. The exponential increase of petroleum and natural gas consumption by high population, rapidly industrializing, countries like India and China.

3. The willingness of the mostly Islamic oil producing countries to adopt an anti-USA profile – covertly or overtly – to survive themselves or avoid fundamental Islamic terrorist attacks on their own autocratic governments. In addition, a desire to increase the windfall profits of higher oil revenues either achieved by price hikes or perhaps by a link to the Euro compared to a weakening US Dollar.

4. The fear and apprehension of non-Islamic countries, some of them like Britain or Norway, also oil producers, over the rising discontent or civil disobedience within their Moslem populations. This results in reluctance to confront or annoy them politically or socially. Meanwhile, strident Wahabbi or Salafist preachers abuse the freedoms in their host countries to encourage death and destruction onto Westerners and their property. Without thought to the wounds they would inflict on themselves in the process. Ahmadi-Nejad's thought process would echo this.

In the USA, constitutional rights, increasingly politically liberal judges, activist social power centers like the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), political correctness to an extreme, supported by a left leaning Main Stream Media, all exacerbate the situation. Energy, required for defending America or opposing countries like Iran, ends up squandered on internal political challenges and sniping than on direct security and war on terrorism. In the end, often preventing and sabotaging active and effective counter-measures against either terrorist or economical disaster.

In Europe, the recent London bombings, murder of a Dutch descendant of painter Van Gogh and the ever-rising threat from Islamic leaders of former Yugoslavian territories, acting on behalf of Al Qaeda, have begun to reverse liberal attitudes and laws. Britain, with a previously "cradle to grave" socially structured approach to government has now put in place comparatively draconian measures and statutes out of self-protection.

5. "Old Europe" governments, with France predominantly at the helm or pulling strings, resent loss of old glory and superpower status to, in their eyes, an uncouth nation like America and hold little love for the country which took away the corrupt billions of oil for food revenues from their banks and national budgets. In addition, the USA refused to accommodate their wishes by unilaterally, so to speak, taking down Saddam Hussein. Having lost Iraqi revenues, France and Germany still insist on accommodating the Islamic regime in Iran for purely financial reasons, such as multi-billion dollar rail projects and petroleum related contracts. Even Britain, a staunch ally, has tried to negotiate the impossible with Iran to receive a more than welcome income. All three overlook reality. Moreover, tacitly support anti-USA trends under the guise of diplomacy, which they knew in advance, could not work, but prevent an easy confrontation of the issues.

6. President Vladimir Putin of Russia emits similar regrets, of a former superpower leader, as he was in the Soviet Union and the loss of revenues from Iraq. His recent government restructuring toward the good old days has finally forced him to deny he wants to create a Soviet style autocracy. Unlike Europe, that has no worry about losing the USA market for his exports if the value of the dollar drops and the Euro rises. Russia selling very little to America will benefit from a change from the dollar as the primary oil currency. Thus selling vast Russian crude oil capacity and reserves at a higher income rate than the dollar provides. Moreover, giving a satisfying poke in the eye of a former enemy without receiving blame; a lingering pleasure dating to the days when he headed the Soviet KGB.

7. Intentional harm to the USA by leaders like Chavez of Venezuela, who threatens to divert the two daily oil tankers Venezuela sends to US shores to China instead, or Iran's announced redirection of oil previously sent to Japan also to China, provide examples of economically painful punishment or retaliation that can be meted out directly and indirectly. Iran's ploy kills two birds with one stone: hurt a strong, totally oil-import reliant Western ally like Japan and encourage China's veto power at the UN to take Iran's side in future non-proliferation discussions at the Security Council.

8. Increasingly thirsty for oil and natural gas for its industries, China has moments of multiple personality disorder despite natural Chinese multi-tasking abilities. It has to balance out its own currency status, presently directly linked to the dollar, a desire to clinch deals, barter or otherwise, with Iran for oil and natural gas and a concern about the effects of unlinking of the dollar as the primary oil currency on the USA market, to which so much of their exports find their way.

At the same time, with probably dubious results from floating the Chinese Yuan conflicting with negative production costs if their currency stays fixed to the dollar, the Chinese have major unemployment dilemmas to resolve. Among these comes the prominent need to find work for vast rural populations and occupy the minds and energies of out of work homeland migrants to the cities.

Negative production comes about if the Chinese insist on of linking the Yuan the Dollar – after the Dollar falls. The cost of raw materials they need to manufacture goods they sell to the USA could eventually be higher than the value of the dollars they receive. To create jobs and deal with currency factors, the Chinese have started building huge oil reserve tank farms with a primary aim of controlling or leveling peaks in oil prices. Although it could take as long as a decade to complete this project, it becomes another factor in turning oil rather than dollars or even the Euro into the "prime reserve currency".

As a proponent, supporter and financier of anti-Western religious Islamic fervor, Iran receives support even from the Sunnis, who normally consider the Shia Moslem Iranians as infidels and non-believers. The newly "elected" or more accurately "selected" Iranian President and his cabinet, secular though they may outwardly be, have tightened the imposition of strict Islamic code and mores on their population and garnered additional support for their actions from international Islamic groups or adherents such as the Afghan Taliban.

This new government of mostly former or active Revolutionary Guard members and the Bassij (an organization created to act as enforcers by Khomeini, which, in the last few weeks, has received vastly expanded powers to attack and suppress) holds little or no regard for the welfare of the world and the family of nations. Ahmadi-Nejad would prefer to be famous for crashing the world economy and destituting all civilized countries than for praise for a measured global commonsense approach to politics and economics. Imposing Islam on a socially and financially staggered or crushed global community would be easier to accomplish and make him a hero in the history of Islam.

Specially, when the crash would bring Iran, with a wealth of oil and natural gas reserves with which to barter to the fore, in a future scenario where money or currency might have no value, probably as a new superpower. A superpower additionally backed by nuclear weapons that the West would not be able to prevent Iran from making and deploying.

Poorer Islamic and Third World nations, used to living off their land and internal production, will suddenly find themselves better off than the Western nations who offer services and technology instead of tangible assets for trade. They will eagerly support Iran for their potential rise in a suddenly reversed, upside-down world. As a whole, Iran can be counted on to behave in a totally selfish, irrational to Western logic, manner without consideration of the well being of other nations or the misery that might be caused by the crash of the dollar.

Ahmadi-Nejad will feel he has vindicated the ideals of his mentor Khomeini and justified the support of the person behind his rise to power – Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi – himself a full-fledged follower of Khomeini's philosophy of exporting Islam to rule the world. Ayatollah Yazdi considers the current Supreme Ruler, Ali Khamenei, an upstart and devoid of any clerical or religious qualifications, changing Khamenei's alliance to the hard core military government, with which he allied himself out of necessity more than desire, into only a temporary delay in being removed from power. While many would agree with the criticism, it does appear to be a pot calling the kettle black. Khamenei's response to this danger has been to appoint a military man from the Shah's era to head the Armed Forces and obstruct the Revolutionary Guard clique, which Ahmadi-Nejad has brought to power.

Naysayers offer several reasons to dispute the likelihood of Iran succeeding, willingly or unintentionally from crashing the dollar and the consequent 1920s and 1930s style depression of the USA sweeping the whole world. Primarily, logical minds cannot envisage nor conceive of a nation, even Iran, cutting off its nose to spite its face as crashing the dollar would generally do to most of the world. Forgetting, however, Iran would emerge smelling of roses and financially stronger than the rest of the world. Iran's determined ability to ignore any internal demands and suppress their population also removes one tool the West could use to weaken or hamper Iran.

Economists equally scoff at the currency market being unable to right itself in the face of fluctuations if left to its own devices. Equally overlooking the fragility of the dollar and the lack of any desire or motivation by the new Iranian government to assist in an adjustment and help prevent global economic mayhem.

The lack of success of the UAE through Dubai to form a successful Oil Exchange fails to address the same criteria of Iran's readiness to sacrifice anyone and anything to succeed and additionally having far greater reserves with which to accomplish their ends without hurting their own revenues now that oil prices have risen so high.

A more realistic argument posits that the Iranian oil fields are old and require huge investments to continue production or to keep them at anywhere near current levels. New oil fields will take time to bring online and curtail the speed of Iran's actions. In addition, Iran's natural gas fields, the second largest reserve in the world after Russia, have yet to be developed fully and cannot provide a big enough supply to make a significant difference in the markets. Left out of the thought equation of actual production targets here is that oil is not the principle factor but oil-currency will be.

Even with the infighting already underway in Iran among the Mullahs jockeying for position or survival, the new hardnosed military regime and various other parties at the table, like the Ministry of Oil, practical ways of preventing Iran from accomplishing global currency upheaval has been beyond the ability of any scenarios offered up. Other than a Nagasaki/Hiroshima destruction of the Islamic regime in the form of either the clerical or semi-secular guise it now has.

Unfortunately, Americans as a nation, tend to refuse to take firm action until disaster strikes making preventive measures difficult to put into place. Assuming that any measures would suffice, which many have begun to doubt they would.

Declines in the value of the dollar would make US Treasury Bonds harder to sell, to finance deficit spending, requiring raising interest rates to attract investors, - immediately raising US national debt payments and depleting the Federal Budget even more. Higher interest rates would slow economic growth with declines in the Stock Market and Real Estate – potentially creating Stagflation (inflation during a stagnant growth).

One disbeliever in the potential dire straits of a dollar crash and loss of value stated that there would be no negative effect since the national debt would also be paid in devalued dollars. Perhaps he never encountered or heard of banks suddenly raising the interest rate on a credit card's outstanding balance from below ten percent to 30% overnight, if they could show a couple of late payments or decided the credit rating of the card holder was below what they desired. Similarly, investors in the US economy through Treasury Bonds or other financial instruments, including the Stock Exchange would not tolerate a reduction of profit or equity from a suddenly greatly lower valued dollar.

The mildest example of what to expect with mildness perhaps possible only if the transitional devaluation of the dollar takes a slow downward spiral instead of a sudden fall, would be a repeat – with more severity - of the Jimmy Carter administration era:

1. Interest rates were so high nobody could afford to finance a house, so this market sector, like many other big-ticket items such as automobiles, slowed to almost a halt in some instances.

2. Grocery items had multiple superimposed price stickers as the cost of goods rose faster than they were bought. Imported retail merchandise normally sells or gets distributed through national chains like Walmart or food chains, so a drop in the dollar makes these more expensive for the buyer and leads to layoffs as the retail chains find their sales volumes and profit margins eroded.

3. The price of energy shot up so much people resorted to wood burning stoves to stay warm at a price they could afford. The quality of life went down.

4. People on fixed incomes could no longer afford to live and the more solvent could not keep abreast of rising prices and interest rates. A drop in the dollar immediately cuts into the value of saved money.

5. Running a business became almost impossible as the price of goods and materials skyrocketed. Sales to a greatly less solvent market plummeted and marketing assumptions needed for advertising, budgeting and planning became wild guesses at best.

What might happen if the dollar devalued rapidly?

Any potential benefits of a fast drop in the dollar, American goods being less expensive to manufacture, leading to increased exports, or tourism income rising from cheaper vacations inside the USA would be short lived as the infrastructure collapses into bankruptcy, disrepair or become too expensive for anyone, including the government, to operate. There would be no public transportation, no hotels and no restaurants. If the actions of some of our citizens in reaction to Katrina are anything to go by, the USA will become less safe than Iraq. Neighborhoods would become armed camps protecting whatever food and material reserves they had against visitors of any kind – domestic or from overseas.

The potential return of outsourced jobs to the USA when domestic manufacturing becomes less expensive, as a benefit of a lower dollar, becomes spurious hopefulness when we ask, "return to what?" To a bankrupt economy unable to bear their weight or to operate within non-functioning infrastructure and unemployment not seen even in the Great Depression of the 1920s and 1930s? Third World countries would be financial paradise compared to the American domestic situation.

Iran would most likely intentionally sabotage any chance of stability and adjustment with an unstoppable vehicle with which to achieve this end. Their newfound nuclear deterrent would discourage use of force against them. Unless someone will act before they have operational weapons of mass destruction.

Otherwise, Iran can throw the USA and the world into the tribulations of the Weimar Republic of Germany after World War I. High inflation and interest rates drove the value of the Mark into the ground and allowed Hitler to present himself as a possible savior. In the present scenario, unlinking of the Dollar as the primary currency for oil purchases creates the same outcome. Or worse. To provide an adequate cash flow to the working class, Hitler promised to pay them once a week, then twice a week, then once a day. When this failed, he allowed workers two hours off work every day to trundle wheelbarrows full of German currency, which barely sufficed to buy a loaf of bread.

To deny history repeating itself ever more forcefully with Ahmadi-Nejat filling in for Hitler, suggests an ostrich head forced into the sand and a refusal to have to counteract an indescribable menace beyond Western logic but totally in alignment with Islamic fervor and more often than not totally destructively constructed plans and emotions.

Saturday, May 6, 2006

WHAT WOULD LOSING THE FIGHT TO ISLAM MEAN

IF YOU HAVE ALREADY READ THE FIRST PART ON REGIME CHANGE IRAN OR ELSEWHERE, SCROLL DOWN TO "COMMENT" AND CONTINUE READING - or reread the opening article to see annotations on the various matters raised by the Sheikh.

In a lecture that touched on the meaning of jihad, a leading Saudi cleric declared the United States is collapsing and Muslims must patiently await their ultimate victory.


Sheik Nasser bin Suleiman Al-Omar said in remarks broadcast on the Arab satellite network Al-Jazeera April 19, "The Islamic nation now faces a great phase of jihad," according to the Middle East Media Research Institute.


Referring to sacred Muslim writings that accompany the Quran, the sheik said "Whoever is familiar with the Sunna and the Hadith knows that a battle against the enemies of Allah awaits on the horizon, in which the Muslims will be victorious. This is confirmed by the reliable hadiths, as well as by reality."


Jihad is now taking place in Afghanistan, "Palestine," Iraq, Chechnya, Kashmir and the Philippines, he said.


Meanwhile, the sheik asserted to his audience, love for America is "now disappearing from the hearts, within America itself and elsewhere, whereas Islam is growing even within America, my brothers." (Must be referring to the self-loathing, blame America first, liberal Democrats and the Main Stream Media).


"Islam is making steady progress in America," Al-Omar said. "Twenty-five thousand people have converted to Islam every year since 9-11, and an even larger figure was mentioned in the New York Times." (Without fear of retribution from the authorities - unlike Moslems converting away from Islam).


The sheik cited a report "submitted by the American intelligence to the American officials, regarding the religion of Islam, which some think is defeated or weak today," saying Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world and Muslims soon will become one-third of the world's population.


He quoted a "U.S. Congressman John Morlan" (probably means Moran, a bleeding heart nutcase), there is no representative by that name, who supposedly said: "The 21st century is the century of Islam, which will offer an opportunity for peace in the world." (As currently imposed at the end of a hangman's rope, torture, lashings, imprisonment and other violent coercion - be peaceful or die at Islam's hands!)


The sheik added: "There is no doubt that it is Islam that will bring peace, and not the U.N., America, Russia, or anyone else."


Interviewed for a PBS "Frontline" documentary on the House of Saud in December 2004, Al-Omar opposed the rewriting of Saudi religious textbooks to eliminate anti-Western, anti-Jewish teachings, and he was one of 26 prominent Saudi clerics who signed a fatwa saying Iraqis should rise up and oppose the Americans in Iraq.


In the Al Jazeera lecture, turning to Iraq, Al-Omar said that with its casualties, "America is now in a predicament."


"You follow the media. America is looking for a way out," he said.

"Yes, I am aware of the harsh reality. I am aware of what is happening to our Muslim brothers in Iraq, and I'm referring especially to the Sunni Arabs, against whom all have conspired and who have been deserted by their closest friends. (What does he expect after they kill their fellow Sunnis, then Shia Moslems and lastly the Coalition forces).


The sheik claimed American reports of the number of casualties in Iraq, about 2,000, are false. He cited "one of the news agencies" and "several of Iraq's religious scholars" who claim there have been more than 40,000 American and Western casualties in three years. (He reports, you decide).

Al-Omar said Americans are dumping their casualties in the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, prompting Iraqi scholars to ask him for a fatwa. (Now he gets really weird and shows how little he understands American families, who demand the return of their loved ones and would notice when one third of our forces seem to vanish into the river).


The sheik explained: "Because there were so many casualties, the Americans began to throw them into the Tigris and the Euphrates.

The fish have eaten from the flesh of the American and have gotten fat. Are we permitted to eat these fish or not?' Yes. (Second hand cannibalism's OK but you cannot eat shellfish or lobsters). This is the truth, brothers." Al-Omar said the "Islamic nation now faces a great phase of jihad, unlike anything we knew 50 years ago."


Fifty years ago, jihad was attributed only to a few individuals in Palestine and in some other Muslims areas, he said, but "following the events of Afghanistan, the nation has embraced jihad. Young and old, men and women - everyone is talking about jihad."


Some young Muslims today, however, because of their "love for jihad," are getting involved in conflicts that are not properly jihad, he said, adding all these minor battles, which took place in certain Muslim countries, only delay the victory."


"This diverts the strife and calamity into the lands of the Muslims, instead of aiming them directly at the enemies," he said.


In a June 13, 2004, interview with Al-Majd television, Al-Omar said America is collapsing from within." (From the view presented by Main Stream Media and loath-America voices inside our country, his conclusion has logic to it).


"Where are America's principles of justice and democracy?" he asked. " … Is America now, with its reputation and status, the same America of 30 years ago – the source of hope for many people?" (More likely if we did not have to deal with your Jihadists and the oppression of people by Islam to force them to behave in an uniform way, just as the atheist Communism did their populaces. Islam seems to have taken a page from that book with an "ism" of its own, like Fascism).


Islam is "advancing according to a steady plan," the sheik said, "to the point that tens of thousands of Muslims have joined the American army and Islam is the second largest religion in America." (Compared to 90% Christianity, second biggest does not mean much - except to fervent listeners of this lecturer who do not have all the facts and fall for statistical misdirected slogans).

NOTE: Nearly 1.5 million Africans have renounced Islam in the past year and chosen other religions.


"Today," he said, "America is defeated. I have no doubt, not even for a minute, that America is on its way to destruction." (He has been reading the New York Times and Washington Post again).


But the United States "will be destroyed gradually," he said, requiring Muslims to be "patient." MEMRI recently reported Libyan Leader Moammar Gadhafi declared in a speech aired on Al Jazeera that Islam will take over Europe without violent force within a few decades. (Sadly, he is coming closer to reality here).


"We have 50 million Muslims in Europe," Gadhafi said. "There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe – without swords, without guns, without conquests. The 50 million Muslims of Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades." (Spain already surrendered after the railway bombings and France with a 20% Moslem population can either act firmly and defensively or burn, then surrender. Some schools in Sweden do not have a single ethnic Swedtheirthier classes - not one!)

COMMENT


The enemy reads bleeding heart liberals and self-destructive Democrats and weak-kneed EU authorities better than we read the enemy.

Cannot all of us see the underlying potential truth in this man's comments, unpleasant as they may be to our dignity?

Does not the illegal immigrant growth and pressure - here in the USA and in Europe - and the greater reproduction rate that swells their ranks not clearly indicate the danger of leaving Islam alone and appeasing or negotiating?


Will we only react in a few decades when Americans getting off an aircraft in Europe have to wear Moslem attire or even Burkhas?

Or in Canada? Or in some of our own cities and regions?


Wake up world! Smell the danger and DO something about it, instead of stirring the silt in the cesspools that grow and fester among and around us and will eventually suffocate us.


Moslems can be great people individually but Islam is not a religion, it is a political "ism" just like fascism.



This WAR is for REAL!


To get out of a difficulty, one usually must go through it.

Our country is now facing the most serious threat to its existence, as we know it, that we have faced in your lifetime and mine (which includes WWII).


The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the fact that there are very few of us who think we can possibly lose this war and even fewer who realize what losing really means.


First, let's examine a few basics:


1. When did the threat to us start? Many will say September 11, 2001.

The answer as far as the United States is concerned is 1979 - 22 years prior to September 2001, with the following attacks on us:


* Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979;

* Beirut, Lebanon Embassy 1983;

* Beirut, Lebanon Marine Barracks 1983;

* Lockerbie, Scotland Pan-Am flight to New York 1988;

* First New York World Trade Center attack 1993;

* Dhahran, Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers Military complex 1996;

* Nairobi, Kenya US Embassy 1998;

* Dares Salaam, Tanzania US Embassy 1998;

* Aden, Yemen USS Cole 2000;

* New York World Trade Center 2001;

* Pentagon 2001. (Note that during the period from 1981 to 2001 there were 7,581 terrorist attacks worldwide).


2 - Why were we attacked?

Envy of our position, our success, and our freedoms. The attacks happened during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton and Bush 2.

We cannot simply fault either the Republicans or Democrats as there were no provocations by any of the presidents or their immediate predecessors.


3. Who were the attackers?

In each case, the attacks on the US were carried out by Muslims.


4. What is the Muslim population of the World?

25%. i.e. 1,200,000,000. (That is 1,200 million.)

5. Isn't the Muslim Religion peaceful?

Hopefully, but that is really not material. There is no doubt that the predominately Christian population of Germany was peaceful, but under the dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also "Christian"), that made no difference.

You either went along with the administration or you were eliminated.

There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by the Nazis for political reasons (including 7,000 Polish priests). (see http://www.nazis.testimony.co.uk/7-a.htm ).


Thus, almost the same number of Christians were killed by the Nazis, as the six million holocaust Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom heard of anything other than the Jewish atrocities. (Just as we do not hear of most of the atrocities by Moslems of Moslems).

Although Hitler kept the world focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy about killing anyone who got in his way of exterminating the Jews or of taking over the world - German, Christian or any others. (The same policy applies to Islam, specially the Velayat Faghih version of Rouhollah Khomeini, who will maim and execute to enforce his "religious" authority).

Same with the Muslim terrorists. They focus the world on the US, but kill all in the way -- their own people or the Spanish, French or anyone else.

The point here is that just like the peaceful Germans were of no protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims there may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing -- by their own pronouncements -- killing all of us "infidels." I don't blame the peaceful Muslims. What would you do if the choice was shut up or die?


6. So whom are we at war with?

There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than the Muslim terrorists.

Trying to be politically correct and avoid verbalizing this conclusion can well be fatal. There is no way to win if you don't clearly recognize and articulate whom you are fighting.


So with that background, now to the two major questions:


1. Can we lose this war?

2. What does losing really mean?

If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two pivotal questions.
We can definitely lose this war, and as anomalous as it may sound, the major reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom the answer to the second question - What does losing mean?


It would appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means hanging our heads, bringing the troops home and going on about our business, like post Vietnam. This is as far from the truth as one can get .

What losing really means is:

We would no longer be the premier country in the world. The attacks on us will not subside, but rather will steadily increase.

Remember, they want us dead, not just quiet.

If they had just wanted us quiet, they would not have produced an increasing series of attacks against us, over the past 18 years. The plan was clearly, for terrorist s to attack us, until we were neutered and submissive to them.

We would of course have no future support from other nations, for fear of reprisals and for the reason that they would see, how impotent we are and unable to help them.


Islam will pick off the other non-Muslim nations, one at a time. It will be increasingly easier for them.

They already hold Spain hostage. It doesn't matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw its troops from Iraq. Spain did it because the Muslim terrorists bombed their train and told them to withdraw the troops. Anything else they want Spain to do will be done. Spain is finished.


The next will probably be France. Our one hope on France is that they might see the light and realize that if we don't win, they are finished too, in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists without us.

However, it may already be too late for France. France is already 20% Muslim and fading fast!

If we lose the war, our production, income, exports and way of life will all vanish as we know it. After losing, who would trade or deal with us, if they were threatened by the Muslims?

If we can't stop the Muslims, how could anyone else? (Even dare to try!)


The Muslims fully know what is riding on this war, and therefore, are completely committed to winning, at any cost. We better know it too and be likewise committed to winning at any cost.

Why go on at such lengths about the results of losing? Simple. Until we recognize the costs of losing, we cannot unite and really put 100% of our thoughts and efforts into winning. And it is going to take that 100% effort to win.

So, how can we lose the war?

Again, the answer is simple. We can lose the war by "imploding."

That is, defeating ourselves by refusing to recognize the enemy and their purpose, and really digging in and lending full support to the war effort.

If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. If we continue to be divided, there is no way that we can win!

A few examples of how we simply don't comprehend the life and death seriousness of this situation.

President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary of Transportation. Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men between 17 and 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow " profiling " .

Does that sound like we are taking this thing seriously? This is war! (as opposed to criminal conduct). For the duration we are going to have to give up some of the civil rights we have become accustomed to.

We had better be prepared to lose some of our civil rights temporarily or we will most certainly lose all of them permanently. (What kind of civil rights do you expect to have if Islam dominates the world and the USA)

And don't worry that it is a slippery slope. We gave up plenty of civil rights during WWII, and immediately restored them after the victory and in fact added many more since then.


Blame President Bush or President Clinton before him?


No, blame us the people for blithely assuming we can maintain all of our Political Correctness, and all of our civil rights during this conflict and have a clean, lawful, honorable war. None of those words apply to war. Get them out of your head.

Some have gone so far in their criticism of the war and/or the Administration that it almost seems they would literally like to see us lose.

This isn't because they are disloyal. It is because they just don't recognize what losing means, nor what it takes to win.

Nevertheless, that conduct of free expression gives the impression to the enemy that we are divided and weakening. It concerns our friends, and it does great damage to our cause.

Of more recent vintage, the uproar fueled by the politicians and media regarding the treatment of some prisoners of war, perhaps exemplifies this best.

We have recently had an issue involving the treatment of a few Muslim prisoners of war by a small group of our military police. These are the type of prisoners who just a few months ago were throwing their own people off buildings, cutting off their hands, cutting out their tongues and otherwise murdering their own people just for disagreeing with Saddam Hussein.

And just a few years ago these same type prisoners killed 400,000 of their own people for the same reason.

They are also the same type of enemy fighters, who recently were burning Americans, and dragging their charred corpses through the streets of Iraq.

And still more recently, the same type enemy that was and is providing videos to all news sources internationally, of the beheading of American prisoners they held. (See the Armstrong murder link on this site to get the message of their ice cold, vicious minds. Activities the liberal left wants to "protect" with our civilized, sane laws that have no meaning to the perpetrators of these horrific acts).

Compare this with some of our press and politicians, who for several days have thought and talked about nothing else but the "humiliation" of some Muslim prisoners -- not burning them, not dragging their charred corpses through the streets, not beheading them, but "humiliating" them.

Can this be for real? (Do they have any sense of proportion?)

The politicians and pundits have even talked of impeachment of the Secretary of Defense. If this doesn't show the complete lack of comprehension and understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are fighting, the life and death struggle we are in and the disastrous results of losing this war, nothing can. (Does this not sound like cutting off your nose to spite your face -- help the enemy anyway we can - just to hit the Administration - without any realization of the hurt to themselves that that will follow their ignorance and stupidity?)

To bring our country to a virtual political standstill over this prisoner issue makes us look like Nero playing his fiddle as Rome burned -- totally oblivious to what is going on in the real world.

Neither we, nor any other country, can survive this internal strife.

Again, this does not always mean that some of our politicians or media people are disloyal. It simply means that they are absolutely oblivious to the magnitude, of the situation we are in and into which the Muslim terrorists have been pushing us, for many years. Usually because their experience is Statewide, perhaps Nationwide but rarely worldwide. And when it is global, tainted by their local neighborhood mindsets and limited knowledge of the cultures with which they deal.

Remember, the Muslim terrorists stated goal is to kill all infidels!

That translates into ALL non-Muslims ( and even many less fanatical Muslims of other denominations) not just in the United States, but throughout the world.

We are the last bastion of defense.

We have been criticized for many years as being " arrogant ". That charge is valid in at least one respect. We are arrogant in that we believe that we are so good, powerful and smart, that we can win the hearts and minds of all those who attack us, and that with both hands tied behind our back, we can defeat anything bad in the world!
We can't!

If we don't recognize this, our nation as we know it will not survive, and no other free country in the world will survive if we are defeated.

And finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world that allow freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, equal rights for anyone -- let alone everyone, equal status or any status for women, or that have been productive in one single way that contributes to the good of the world.

This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on this war or we will be relegated in the history books to the self-inflicted fall of the Roman Empire.

If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow history books to be written or read.

If we don't win this war right now, keep a close eye on how the Muslims take over France in the next 5 years or less. They will continue to increase the Muslim population of France and continue to encroach little by little, on the established French traditions.

The French will be fighting among themselves, over what should or should not be done, which will continue to weaken them and keep them from any united resolve. Doesn't that sound eerily familiar?

Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away from them by some external military force. Instead, they give their freedoms away, politically correct piece, by politically correct piece.

And they are giving those freedoms away to those who have shown, worldwide, that they abhor freedom and will not apply it to you or even to themselves, once they are in power.

They have universally shown that when they have taken over, they then start brutally killing each other over who will be the few who control the masses.

Will we ever stop hearing from the politically correct, about the "peaceful Muslims"?

If we are united, there is no way that we can lose. Hopefully, after the elections, the factions in our country will begin to focus on the critical situation we are in, and will unite to save our country. It is your future we are talking about! Do whatever you can to preserve it.
After reading the above, we all must do this not only for ourselves, but our children, our grandchildren, our country and the world.


Whether Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal or anything in between and that includes the Politicians and media of our country and the free world, if you want to be aroundremainemian free, wake up and smell the danger you so blithely ignore - to your own detriment!

Biblical Opinion

"Scattered into all the nations that make up the spiritual empire the Bible calls 'Babylon', the people of God have been held captive in a pagan environment.

This captivity became a key part of the mechanism for the rescue of God: "To Babylon you must go and there you will be rescued; there God will ransom you out of the power of your enemies." (Micah 4:10).

Pagan in its origination, Christ tried to cure the Roman empire and lead it to God. His disciples poured the Gospel of heaven inside its philosophic borders, filling the whole to overflowing.

This Christian attempt at cleansing Babylon met, at first, with immediate success. The infusion of the Gospel saved the captive children of God, but the healing of Babylon, itself, proved shortlived.

Like a cancer once in remission, paganism has quietly returned, suddenly turning metastatic in our day, and bringing western civilization immense notoriety in the modern world for a decadence unparalleled since the time of the Caesar's.

It's conversion to Christ is the proof of the mortal wound Jesus delivered to paganism -- the one described by John in the Book of Revelations -- and the western world's recent recant of that conversion, the wound's healing.

Rising up from the ashes of Sodom and Gomorrah, capitols of hedonism like 'Hollywood' and 'Las Vegas' now stand as sister-cities to their originals, and others just like them are rising up to dot the landscape of the nations of the western world.

Powered by people who hate Christ, these real-life 'Pottersville's' are enemies of everything the Bible stands for, and they are spewing out a satanic and godless filth that has covered the world like soot pouring up from a vast spiritual chimney rising up from the depths of the devil's Abyss.

As this empire's decadence grows, so, too, does a spiritual menace on the other side of the Euphrates river. It is growing there in response to the Bible's law.

The only thing that has kept this Persian giant in remission is faith in Christ.

With that now in freefall, Persia has awakened and has begun to break off its chains. Spiritually these two empires designate sin on the one side, and its scourge on the other.

In spiritual terms, Persia is the Bible's natural law -- a response built right into the creation as an answer to profligate behavior. It has nothing to do with the judgment. That comes later.

The tribulation and the judgment are completely different and are powered by entirely different entities. It is the Bible that brings the tribulation, because, as Jesus proved, its terms must be followed.

It is God that brings the Judgment and that will come after the tribulation has ended. Babylon is a conglomerate of nations buried in sinful conduct, while Persia is the destructive force that is destined to bring Babylon to its final ruin."



Monday, April 17, 2006

REVISED - Think Iran - Think HOJATIEH!

NEW CONTENT ADDED about half way down

General consideration needed when you think about Iran = Hojatieh!


Mesbah Yazdi

"Hojatieh" headed by looney Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi, wants the quick return of the 12th Imam, a boy who disappeared down a well in the 1300s and is a direct descendant of the Prophet Mohammad.


Ahamdi-Nejad is a desciple of Mesbah Yazdi and a true believer of the Hojatieh.


The Hojatieh creed, which was too crazy even for Khomeini, who created the Islamic regime in Iran, says the 12th Imam will return to bring salvation to mankind (similar to the second coming of Christ concept) BUT ....


In order for him to return for this purpose there has to be sufficient death, misery, oppression, pain and suffering in the world to make it worth his while (so to speak).


THUS.... to encourage a speedy return of the 12th Imam, the Hojatieh (presently the dominant Islamic creed in Iran with Mesbah Yazdi the power behind the throne and likely to become the Supreme Ruler in the very near future) insists that their duty is to create enough death, misery, oppression, pain and suffering to entice the 12th Imam to return.


AND.... Anyone who acts to prevent all this suffering etc., is against Islam (as per Hojatieh) and as an apostate should be killed.


SO.... fear of mutual self-destruction - as was the case with the Soviets and to some extent with the Chinese - is exactly the opposite of what the Hojatieh want, fear or believe.

They would love mutual self-destruction to occur so that they create enough reason for their 12th Imam to return to the world and bring Islamic salvation.


Whenever you think of Iran think of this and understand that anything and everything you have held dear and reasonable about them NO LONGER HOLDS TRUE.


Pol Pot of Cambodia, who murdered millions of his own countrymen, some for simply having weak eyesight and wearing glasses (inference of being educated) was a Boy Scout and really sane compared to what we have at the helm in Iran.


And we quibble whether we should perhaps not bomb Iran and allow this bunch of lunatics to have nuclear weapons to implement their Hojatieh philosophies on the rest of the world.


The only real question is which "innocents" to save. The Iranian population of some 70 million (though only a few hundred thousand would actually perish) or HUNDREDS of millions around the globe when Iran unleashes nuclear weaponry AND THEIR OIL WEAPON - in the near future and triggers something even Hitler could not dream of or even wish to achieve.

Here is Amir Taheri's take on the same subject:

Last Monday, just before he announced that Iran had gatecrashed "the nuclear club", President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad disappeared for several hours. He was having a khalvat (tête-à-tête) with the Hidden Imam, the 12th and last of the imams of Shiism who went into "grand occultation" in 941.

According to Shia lore, the Imam is a messianic figure who, although in hiding, remains the true Sovereign of the World. In every generation, the Imam chooses 36 men, (and, for obvious reasons, no women) naming them the owtad or "nails", whose presence, hammered into mankind's existence, prevents the universe from "falling off".

Although the "nails" are not known to common mortals, it is, at times, possible to identify one thanks to his deeds. It is on that basis that some of Ahmad-inejad's more passionate admirers insist that he is a "nail", a claim he has not discouraged.

For example, he has claimed that last September, as he addressed the United Nations' General Assembly in New York, the "Hidden Imam drenched the place in a sweet light".


Last year, it was after another khalvat that Ahmadinejad announced his intention to stand for president. Now, he boasts that the Imam gave him the presidency for a single task: provoking a "clash of civilisations" in which the Muslim world, led by Iran, takes on the "infidel" West, led by the United States, and defeats it in a slow but prolonged contest that, in military jargon, sounds like a low intensity, asymmetrical war.


In Ahmadinejad's analysis, the rising Islamic "superpower" has decisive advantages over the infidel. Islam has four times as many young men of fighting age as the West, with its ageing populations. Hundreds of millions of Muslim "ghazis" (holy raiders) are keen to become martyrs while the infidel youths, loving life and fearing death, hate to fight. Islam also has four-fifths of the world's oil reserves, and so controls the lifeblood of the infidel. More importantly, the US, the only infidel power still capable of fighting, is hated by most other nations.


According to this analysis, spelled out in commentaries by Ahmadinejad's strategic guru, Hassan Abassi, known as the "Dr Kissinger of Islam", President George W Bush is an aberration, an exception to a rule under which all American presidents since Truman, when faced with serious setbacks abroad, have "run away". Iran's current strategy, therefore, is to wait Bush out. And that, by "divine coincidence", corresponds to the time Iran needs to develop its nuclear arsenal, thus matching the only advantage that the infidel enjoys.


Moments after Ahmadinejad announced "the atomic miracle", the head of the Iranian nuclear project, Ghulamreza Aghazadeh, unveiled plans for manufacturing 54,000 centrifuges, to enrich enough uranium for hundreds of nuclear warheads. "We are going into mass production," he boasted.


The Iranian plan is simple: playing the diplomatic game for another two years until Bush becomes a "lame-duck", unable to take military action against the mullahs, while continuing to develop nuclear weapons.


Thus do not be surprised if, by the end of the 12 days still left of the United Nations' Security Council "deadline", Ahmadinejad announces a "temporary suspension" of uranium enrichment as a "confidence building measure". Also, don't be surprised if some time in June he agrees to ask the Majlis (the Islamic parliament) to consider signing the additional protocols of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT).


Such manoeuvres would allow the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) director, Muhammad El-Baradei, and Britain's Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, to congratulate Iran for its "positive gestures" and denounce talk of sanctions, let alone military action. The confidence building measures would never amount to anything, but their announcement would be enough to prevent the G8 summit, hosted by Russia in July, from moving against Iran.


While waiting Bush out, the Islamic Republic is intent on doing all it can to consolidate its gains in the region. Regime changes in Kabul and Baghdad have altered the status quo in the Middle East. While Bush is determined to create a Middle East that is democratic and pro-Western, Ahmadinejad is equally determined that the region should remain Islamic but pro-Iranian. Iran is now the strongest presence in Afghanistan and Iraq, after the US. It has turned Syria and Lebanon into its outer defences, which means that, for the first time since the 7th century, Iran is militarily present on the coast of the Mediterranean. In a massive political jamboree in Teheran last week, Ahmadinejad also assumed control of the "Jerusalem Cause", which includes annihilating Israel "in one storm", while launching a take-over bid for the cash-starved Hamas government in the West Bank and Gaza.


Ahmadinejad has also reactivated Iran's network of Shia organisations in Bahrain, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Yemen, while resuming contact with Sunni fundamentalist groups in Turkey, Egypt, Algeria and Morocco. From childhood, Shia boys are told to cultivate two qualities. The first is entezar, the capacity patiently to wait for the Imam to return. The second is taajil, the actions needed to hasten the return. For the Imam's return will coincide with an apocalyptic battle between the forces of evil and righteousness, with evil ultimately routed. If the infidel loses its nuclear advantage, it could be worn down in a long, low-intensity war at the end of which surrender to Islam would appear the least bad of options. And that could be a signal for the Imam to reappear.


At the same time, not to forget the task of hastening the Mahdi's second coming, Ahamdinejad will pursue his provocations. On Monday, he was as candid as ever: "To those who are angry with us, we have one thing to say: be angry until you die of anger!"


His adviser, Hassan Abassi, is rather more eloquent. "The Americans are impatient," he says, "at the first sight of a setback, they run away. We, however, know how to be patient. We have been weaving carpets for thousands of years."


• Amir Taheri is a former Executive Editor of Kayhan, Iran's largest daily newspaper, but now lives in Europe

Sunday, April 9, 2006

IRAN'S NUKES

Iran has recently been announcing that it will show the world something incredible. So far we have seen some missiles, miniature flying boats and missile torpedoes.

It is more than possible and more likely the subject of their "incredible surprise" that Iran could reach proof of concept test stage for its military nuclear program within the time frame forecast; ie: by March or April, 2006.

However, how such a test is undertaken will tell, in reality, the level of credibility of the clerics’ nuclear threat.

If the test were an actual underground explosion, for example, it would highlight the reality that the clerics are attempting to make a statement to domestic and general audiences around the world, not to prove, scientifically, the capability.

Such proof can also be achieved without detonation, by demonstrating the viability of the triggers, and using computer simulation from that point onwards. However, this avenue lacks psychological impact at a political level.

It is possible, if a live weapon were used, that this could be one of the eight or more warheads now in the hands of the Pasdaran Air Force. At least three were acquired from Kazakhstan in December 1991.

By the end of 1991, Iran had all (or virtually all) the components needed to make three operational nuclear weapons: aerial bombs and/or surface-to-surface missile (SSM) warheads. Highly-reliable sources had long ago stated that the weapons were assembled from parts bought in the ex-Soviet Muslim republics.

These weapons became operational as early as February to April 1992. Tehran said it is committed to "providing Syria with a nuclear umbrella before June 1992".

The weapons obtained from Kazakhstan were two nuclear warheads and one aerial nuclear bomb. As well, in April 1992-1993, Iran purchased FOUR more warheads for SCUD-type SSMs which were upgraded in the DPRK.

Since that time, Iran acquired a reported four nuclear weapons from Ukraine, and additional warheads from the DPRK (North Korea). There is also evidence that Iran may have acquired up to six warheads from Ukraine, delivered via Afghanistan and Pakistan.

It is understood that the indigenous production focuses around designs which are essentially the same, or similar to, those of Pakistan. An actual detonation of an Iranian weapon would disclose to sensors much about the type of weapon and the origins of the fissionable materials used in its construction.

Having said that, there are very real questions as to the numbers of nuclear weapons which Iran could build domestically in the near-term. To overcome this, Iran has already embarked on a strategy of saturation of Israeli (and other) regional defenses. Including by using Hamas and Hezbollah capability in the region to divert Israel on the ground with local attacks.

It is clear that the major build-up of tactical and theater-strategic ballistic missiles in Hezbollah and Syrian positions is designed to cause Israel to expend its three batteries of Arrow 2 ABM and Patriot PAC-III missiles against an overwhelming array of targets, most of which would be non-nuclear and non-strategic, thus enabling Iran to undertake a second-strike, or follow-on launch, of Shahab-3s with nuclear weapons against a "theoretically" then-defenseless Israel.

Equally, Israel is aware of this and has undertaken steps to determine target priorities and to adopt a launch-through-confirmed-warning counter-attack.

Assuming that an April 2006 date, (apparently moved to May or June) for a supposed surgical US strike against Iranian facilities is believed in Tehran, then clearly the clerics would consider making a move just before that date line. But all of the time frames are extremely speculative.

It also cannot be assumed that all the Iranian deliveries of nuclear weapons would be via ballistic missiles, such as the Shahab-3. One special danger would be an EMP (electromagnetic pulse) fired by Iran over the USA from a retrofited cargo ship, chartered or leased under false identity and hard to find and to counteract. Even an old rust bucket would do the job. In fact this kind of disguise would serve well.

Ukraine already admitted that it had “lost” 18 supersonic, long-range (3,000km) nuclear-capable X-55/KH-55 Granat [NATO codename AS-15 Kent cruise missiles, without their warheads and that 12 had gone to Iran and six to the PRC.

On January 28, 2005, Ukranian parliamentarian Hryhoriy Omelchenko on January 28, 2005, released an open letter to Pres. Viktor Yushchenko stating that Ukraine had illegally sold the cruise missiles to Iran in 2001. The Iranian Government later said that it had “no documentation” on the deal.

The four to six warheads purchased by Iran in 2001 were for the Kh-55, a missiles which was optimized for attacks on US Navy carriers. Meanwhile, as well, the PRC has already transferred to Iran Russian-origin nuclear and strategic technologies without Moscow's permission.

Significantly, the threat is not just from the Shahab SSMs and X-55s, but also from the myriad shorter-range SCUD-type SSMs and anti-ship cruise missiles. Cruise missiles in fixed batteries (mainly near the Straits of Hormuz) are concealed underground.

The next key date in the Iran saga will possibly be the meeting of the Council of Guardians to review the status of Supreme Ruler Ali Khamenei, set for late April and organize a new election for the position - also reportedly postponed to May or June.

Ailing from terminal cancer with perhaps as little as six months to live, the Supreme Ruler faces a challenge from his former supporter and now declared antagonist, Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi, whose 12th Imam apocalypse and Armageddon mind sets were too weird even for Khomeini, who forced the cleric and his Hojatieh movement into a clandestine, underground profile.

As the spiritual mentor for President Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, Mesbah Yazdi has emerged as the power behind the throne and counts on the support of the Revolutionary Guard (Pasdaran) commanders Ahmadi-Nejad has placed in virtually every executive position of power in his administration. And into the administration of universities and into key positions inside Iranian banks.

Reports indicate that Iran has already successfully modified at least one nose cone, perhaps three, as mentioned above, to deliver a nuclear weapon but appears more likely to set off an underground nuclear test to "impress" the world even more than the regular recent display of weapons so far.

However, with Ahmadi-Nejad and his spiritual advisor Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi at the helm, the Iranian demonstration could speculatively be dropping a nuclear bomb on Israel and then basking in the Islamic fervor and congratulations this would bring them.

They are of the Pol Pot type mentality, not the "saner" old-guard Ayatollahs with whom the world has been dealing - however badly and weakly - which now leads to the "flesh eating bacteria" challenge presented by the neo-Iran administration of Ahmadi-Nejad.

Thursday, April 6, 2006

For short articles go to Latest News Briefs

This Home page intentionally carries only in depth, longer analysis or briefings about Iran. As well as links to three or four specific , horrible videos.



Shorter items and newsy bits are covered in Latest News Briefs, whose link is in the left hand Frame/Column.

The Audio/Video and the Graphics (or photos) both "new" sections with links to them also on the left, have some content and will grow as I add to them, so do take a quick look in passing for new items.