REFRESH YOUR MEMORY - WHY WE HAD 9/11

CLICK ON TITLE HEADING TO VIEW VIDEO

If you are undecided about voting for Democrats or Republicans in the coming election remember the following:

1. Jimmy Carter - an idiotic Liberal Democrat was the root cause for the Islamic terrorism rampant in the world today.

Click on the link in the left column to read : "Carter's Illegal Demands on the Shah", which shows how he supported Khomeini replacing the Shah and destabilized not only the Middle East but the world.

And gave fathered today's global terrorist dangers.

Quite apart from also acting as a "surrogate Soviet", instead of an American president with American national interests, by putting into place policies that repeatedly benefited the Soviets - or removing obstacles to Soviet advances in Africa (via Cubans) and blinding American intelligence by changing an American satellite trajectory monitoring Cuba at a time when Soviets wanted to once again bring in missiles into Cuba.

2. Then came Socialist/Liberal Democrat Billy Clinton. While a Fulbright Scholar Europe he secretly visited the Soviet Union and as a strong Socialist, borderline Communist, philosophically buddied up to them.

By the time he became President, Ronald Reagan had "dismantled" the Soviets, so Clinton turned to the only major Communist power - China - for support and in return helped their aims rather than the best interests of America.

For example, he allowed transfer of critical U.S. technology for missile guidance to China, so they could drop their nuclear warheads with more precision on his fellow Americans. As long as they contributed to his "election war" chest that did not bother him.

Through his Justice Department, he put up barriers (Deputy Attorney General Gorelick handling that one with special regulations) to prevent easy sharing of intelligence information among the various intel agencies and building a huge wall between the CIA and the FBI where they could not share acquired knowledge to fight terrorism. Which contributed strongly to 9/11 happening.

He then proceeded to emasculate the CIA (apart from refusing to meet with the Director) by ordering that CIA operatives were not allowed to work with or through anyone with a criminal record - thus blocking infiltration of any organization specially terrorist ones, whose members were not upstanding citizens.

If you want to infiltrate a criminal, terrorist or even a neighborhood gang to try to obtain information, your entry HAS to be through someone with a bad record that they trust. They do not have "goody-goody" members. But, no, this was no longer permitted by orders of Clinton and his gang.

No longer able to do their jobs, operational CIA employees resigned in droves and the rest became corporate career types, which will take at least another five years to revive into an effective spy agency to protect us. To be achieved over the resistance and even sabotage by the Clintonista, anti-Bush contingents still in various positions, who refuse to risk near retirement careers by making decisions or promoting action rather than talk.

One of these CIA absolute Bush-haters was or may still be part of the team which provides the Daily Intelligence briefing to the President. You envisage the rest.

Here, they go hand in hand with the heavy mass of similarly minded State Department careerists, who openly remark their job is to talk and negotiate, not propose or support action. They, therefore, support the European foot dragging, endless talk, talk, talk, with parties like the Mullahs, who play them like a foolish fiddle.

Whether it was Arafat disregarding everything to which he set his name toward a peace, Saddam Hussein who ignored 14 United Nation Resolutions and dragged talks out for more than a decade, or presently the Iranian Mullahs, the neo-Hojatieh version currently in charge - whose destructive mindset, way beyond even the Sunni Wahabbis, delights to be appocalyptic and promotes Armageddon as part of their religion.

Throughout all this, in the eight years of the Clinton Administration he and his top Departmental Secretarial positions all functioned to thwart efforts by intelligence agencies, the military and active anti-terrorist operations to use common sense and strike at the roots of the enemy. More from fear of his Chinese sugar-daddies being netted than to protect the Islamic terrorists.

An ABC miniseries starting next Sunday has reaped howls of protest from Clinton and his sidekicks because it reveals their ineptitude (at best) or purposeful obstruction (closer to reality) of agencies tasked with preventing terrorism or having a strong counter-intelligence to prevent our military and nuclear secrets helping China jump a decade ot two ahead of where they were techmologically.

Some analysts, myself included, sense that Clinton's excuse or rationale to himself for his repeated treachery, was to believe that if he balanced the strength of China closer to America, then there would be less likelihood of a conflict - because America would flinch. And this justified his taking huge foreign campaign donations - predominantly from Chinese sources.

As a character insight, of Clinton and his closest staff, remember he illegally took, some might say "stole", a large number of White House items at the end of his term of office and his staff vandalized the White House. The items were returned and the damage repaired but that's the person and the buddies who were in charge for eight years.

And as the video of this article shows (click on article title), he had a splendid chance to "eliminate" Ossama Bin Laden and his insiders. He also refused Sudan's offer to deliver Ossama to him "because he did not have a strong enough legal case with which to prosecute him." In fact, he passed on EIGHT occasions to capture or kill Ossama Bin Laden. Eight!

Hiding behind his handling of terrorism as a "law enforcement" matter with burdens of proof and American protective procedures rarely emulated in any other country, he refused to take Bin Laden when he was offered to him on silver platter by Sudan and when Saudi Arabia did not want to do his dirty work, he dropped the subject and allowed this curse to infect the world and kill some 3,000 Americans in one day on 9/11. More than than US caualties throughout the years of the Iraq war.

If you want you and your family and friends to die sooner than you have to then vote for a Democrat. There are some good ones but so rare as to be the exception which proves the rule. They are talkers not doers and since Republicans do not have a filibuster breaking majority in the Senate, every activity aimed at making us safer - from tighter borders to phone tapping, money flow monitoring - has been leaked to the press (including by the CIA entrenched careerists) and later blocked by liberal judges appointed by "Jimmuh" Carter and/or "Clintoon" - respectively the best Soviet and Chinese presidents America ever had.

Since August 15th, 2005, when Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad was "selected" President of the Islamic regime in Iran, nothing is business as usual, none of the former formulas and parmeters apply to analyse or project likely scenarios. Or as a basis for negotiations. This is a first time appearance of this new "animal", which is Khomeini hatred topped with appocalyptic desires and armed with nuclear weapons.

Wake up, people and smell the roses, not in your gardens but in the death wreaths on the coffins and caskets of the hundreds of thousands, nay perhaps millions, who may soon perish because we "talk" while Iran arms itself with even more nuclear weapons than it already has.

AND THEY ALREADY HAVE AT LEAST FOUR TO SIX IN SHAHAB 3 NOSE CONES!!!! Only those who want to prolong talks deny intelligence data which confirm this capability. Misleadingly saying "truthfully" that Iran does not yet have internally built nuclear weapons but ignoring the ones they have bought and have readied.

We face the World War II, Churchill and Hitler scenario replay in almost exact detail except for the actors. And Democrats appear in the role of Appeasers that cost the world well over 50 million lives.

I will also die along with you since my single voice in the wilderness cannot penetrate into the disbelief that Iran can be worse than Pol Pot. It is worse, friends. Pol Pot only killed his own countrymen, Ahmadi-Nejad would feel glorified to destroy everyone around the world. Remember the second most powerful ayatollah in Iran, Ali-Akbar Meshkini recently stated that the Islamic Regime in Iran is the only legitimate government on the face of the globe.

Procrastination is a suicide pact.

And that's what the Democrats preach and that's what they actively promote. Often using the USA Constitution as an excuse but failing to acknowledge that it was never intended to be a cult suicide pact for the American people, as Democrats are turning it into.

Republicans are by no means perfect either but definitely the lesser of two evils - specially when the safety of our nation is at stake.

For example, take Massachussetts congressman Barney Frank as an epitomy of liberal Democrat thinking, motivation and activity.

Barney Frank sponsored legislation called the "Frank Amendment" (H.R.1280) which repealed the ideological grounds for exclusion making it easier for the 9-11 hijackers and foreign terrorists to obtain visas to enter America.

Even if a visa applicant stated (or this could be proved) he was an ardent Al Qaeda supporter, under the Frank amendment he could not be refused entry into the USA.

His inept meddling in immigration policy tied the hands of at least two federal agencies for the better part of two decades, while terrorists formed their sleeper cells and plotted this nation's demise.

Luckily, Barney Frank has apparently been summarily removed from the Congressional Homeland Security Committee.

Barney Frank explained that he wanted this "easy entry" loophole so that Gabriel Garcia Marquez, a Marxist pro-Castro poet from South America could come and go any time he wanted.

A perfect example of Liberal Democrats giving priority to personal reasons over national and even patriotic imperatives. He'd rather woo and not inconvenience the trendy literati than make common sense decisions that help keep ordinary Americans safe.

Democrat Congressman John Murtha LOUDLY proclaims he wants to withdraw our troops from Iraq and base them in Okinawa (his own words). Either senility or idiocy or ill-will seem to guide this former military man, whom the Marines reject out of hand as one of their own.

Yet he is advanced by Democrat leader Nancy Pelosi as an expert (Murtha retired as a Lt.-Colonel so high level military matters never crossed his desk, nor accessed his mind) to whom America should listen.

And, worst of all, while Democrats of all shapes and sizes virulently attack everything about the Bush Administration, they have NO alternative solution to propose and whatever they field in that regard is what the Bush White House is doing put into different words, without anything new other than an umbrella "appease and retreat" policy.

There's a saying: "it takes a common laborer to destroy a building but an architect and an engineer to build one". The Democrats have firmly put themselves in the destructive shoes of the laborer and attack the "architects and engineeers" they themselves are unable to be successfully for America.

You may not want to vote for a Republican but if you have good common sense you should want even less to vote for a Democrat.