Search This Blog

Thursday, April 26, 2007

150,000 WOMEN ARRESTED IN IRAN

HEY! NANCY PELOSI - WANT TO TALK TO THESE ISLAMIC THROW BACKS ON THE DARK AGES? FLY TO TEHRAN TO NEGOTIATE? REALLY? GET A BRAIN! GET A BACKBONE AND DEFEND WOMEN OR HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN YOU ARE ONE? OR AT LEAST WERE ONE.

HEY! CONDI RICE - YOU ARE A WOMAN AS MUCH AS SECRETARY OF STATE! YOU PROPOSE TALKS WITH THESE ANIMALS? BELIEVE THEY WILL ABIDE BY ANY AGREEMENT YOU REACH WITH THEM? OR ARE YOU OPENING YOURSELF AND OUR COUNTRY TO BEING SAVAGELY "F****D", TOO?

Not YOU nor anyone else can reason with predators like these Islamic Iranian scavenger predators with strong jaws you will allow to grow stronger and fiercer by accomodating them. Easier to reason with the Soviet Bear than with these Islamic Iranian Hyenas

HEY! WOMENS RIGHTS GROUPS. WHY THE DEAFENING SILENCE? NOT IN YOUR BACK YARD, SO OK?

SCROLL DOWN FOR ONE PICTURE OF A WOMAN BEING ARRESTED. FOR LOOKING LOVELY?


Tehran, 26 April (AKI) - Some 150,000 women have been detained in Iran for violating strict new Islamic dress code rules, the country's top police officer has announced. "During the first four days [since the code came into effect] we have picked up 150,000 women who were not properly veiled, but many of them were released after they signed an admission of guilt and a formal apology," General Ismail Ahmadi Moghaddam told journalists.

An unspecified number of the women taken into custody were also forced to undergo psychological counseling (through the standard multiple RAPES, BEATINGS AND ABUSE "therapy" to teach/terrify them how to behave in public. SHADES OF SOVIET GULAGS AND MENTAL INSTITUTIONS FOR DISSIDENTS!), Moghaddam said. “Only 13 of these women are still being held and they will have to stand trial," he explained.

Excerpt - go to http://terrornewsbriefs.blogspot.com/ for the rest of the article. (scroll down)

2 comments:

  1. Sickening! Thanks Alan for the heads up. Where is regimechangeiran.com?

    ReplyDelete
  2. RegimeChangeIran has temporarily suspended public activity but not his efforts.

    ReplyDelete