Search This Blog

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

BASIS FOR ORLY'S CLAIM FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA



Plaintiff(s), v. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET. AL.,

Defendant(s),



CAPTAIN PAMELA BARNETT, ET. AL.,



CASE NO. SA CV09-0082-DOC(ANx)



ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FOR OCTOBER 5, 2009 at 8:30 a.m.



-snip-



"...Unless there is a likelihood that upon motion by a party



the Court would order that any or all discovery is



premature, the Court encourages the parties to begin





discovery before the Scheduling Conference. The parties



shall comply fully with the letter and spirit of Rule 26(a)



and thereby obtain and produce most of what would be



produced in the early stages of discovery, because at the



Scheduling Conference the Court will impose tight deadlines



to complete discovery. RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE OF PARTIES



Counsel shall confer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil



Procedure 26(f). This conference shall occur at least



twenty-one (21) days before the Scheduling Conference set



by the Court. RULE 26(f) REPORT The parties shall file



their Rule 26(f) report with the Court no later than



fourteen (14) days prior to the Scheduling Conference set



by the Court. The report shall contain the following: (1)



(2) (3) a short factual summary of the case and of claims



and defenses.

No comments:

Post a Comment