What happened in Fort Hood and the reasons are encapsulated in the refusal of a Moslem to go and fight other Moslems and his attitude that he was a Moslem first and an American second.
This split loyalty is one of the reasons why the founding fathers insisted on a "natural born" status on anyone becoming president of the USA. Born of two American parents and within the confines of American borders.
This is different from a "native born" America that has been claimed for Obama and the Fort Hood event points to the worries about him and his loyalties to the USA.
Born to a reportedly atheist mother, the religious grounding after his initial Marxist mental upbringing was to Islam. His Kenyan father was a Moslem and his Indonesian step-father was a Moslem and Obama went to a mosque and attended Islamic studies in Indonesia.
He is clearly on record as saying the most beautiful sound in the world is the Islamic call to prayer. The Islamic part, just like with the Fort Hood event, has a built in disloyalty to flag and country.
And here comes the first major consideration: there is no moral equivalency between a devout Moslem and a devout Christian as one reporter stated in a newspaper article, where she said that Major Hasan being a devout Moslem could not be a reason for his actions. Anymore than being a devout Christian would trigger such harmful behavior.
Nor does the apologist comment that the Major spoke no Arabic and thus would not have known to say "Allahu Akbar" (God is great), as has been stated by witnesses, have any validity. He regularly attended the Silver Mosque and these words are part of Koranic invocation in prayers.
Though born in America, Major Hasan grew up a devout Moslem and had the Koran embedded into his mind as part of attending a mosque just as the Bible is embedded in a devout Christian who attends church regularly.
The difference which arises comes from the basic teachings of the Koran and the Bible.
The Koran teaches along the lines of thought and behavior and culture that existed 1,400 years ago and allows allegiance ONLY to Allah not to a nation, not to Democracy, not to any other religion (that's apostasy and punishable with death) but only to blind obedience to what was written almost a millenium and a half ago - failing which there is lethal consequence.
The closest analogy to this would be to follow the tenets of the Old Testament of the Bible and try to impose them on modern day society. Including the vengeful "eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth" declaration.
While Obama surrounds himself with radicals of the Marxist kind, he also elevates fervent and devout Moslems to very high policy making positions in Homeland Security without consideration of what the split in loyalty aspect of their religion can mean to the safety of our nation.
Nor the publicly stated aim of Islam to create a global Islamic Caliphate to rule the world and to increase the number Moslems in high positions, while suiting the Obama personal aim of global government as appears to be his mindset, also endangers it.
Combining the Marxist and Islamic common desire for global power may seem an oxymoronic endeavor and trouble starts when they vie for dominance. Just as being an American and a Moslem conflicted inside major Hasan.
With this conflict already built into the Obama psyche from childhood, he can be comfortable about himself, while others then doubt his ability to protect the USA rather than other conflicting ideals similar to Major Hasan.
A Superior Court judge asked me recently how Islam can justify a claim to being a religion of peace when almost every action and tenet they preach is one of violence without any compassion built into any of it. How do people manage to believe this?
Easy. Islam is presented by Mullahs, who demand obedience and blind belief. They say the religion is one of peace so you must believe it. Or be killed as a heretic.
Do as I say or die is the main philosophy that emerges - clearly seen in how Islamic Iran treats dissenters and protesters every day.
There are tens of millions of Moslems, who do not subscribe to violence. Not because their religion teaches that but because of their own individual minds and living in countries where islam is not the official or ruling religion.
Sadly, they are not the ones who control how the Jihadists behave. And fearing their violence do not dare propose a change in the level of violence that is imposed - again as in Islamic Iran by the Mullahs.
TO WHAT LEVEL IS US MILITARY, FBI, CIA, DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY INFILTRATED WITH MUSLIM JIHADISTS?
In the wake of the cowardly Ft. Hoot mass fatal shooting of 11 or more unarmed U.S. soldiers by Maj. Malik Nadal Hasan, America has the right to know the truth about sleeper war cells in the U.S.
Walid Shoebat Former Islamic Terrorist who was once part of Jihad war cells in the US and understands fully the mindset of terrorists has been warning America of the potential of this very type of tragedy and worse for many years.
Shoebat contends that the US Army, Navy, Air Force, FBI, CIA, Dept. of Homeland Security are all infiltrated with Muslim Extremists.
“America needs to awaken from its sleep and its unwillingness to face the issue of fundamentalist Islam in our midst which undoubtedly is the cause of the tragedy in Ft Hood” says Mr. Shoebat, adding, “Some very serious decisions need to made when it comes to having Muslims protecting our country, as it is impossible to know whether they maybe honorable or foxes in the hen house.”
Walid is the author of the book “Why We Want To Kill You, The Jihad Mindset and How to Defeat it."
INTERVIEW TALKING POINTS
By Walid Shoebat:
-- Nidal Malik Hasan is NOT a convert but Jordanian Muslim SINCE BIRTH! Infiltration by Islamists in the military is a fact. My own brother served in the United States Air Force and his loyalty was to his ideology, yet allowing him to guard nuclear facilities should be on check. Religion is a sensitive issue but we should not undermine our security from fear of ‘Islamophobia.’
-- Muslims by Sharia Law are mandated never to fight Muslims. Muslim soldiers need to be questioned whether this is an issue, yet we virtually never question them.
-- Converts to Islam are susceptible to Islamization; the case of Sgt. Hassan Akbar from Camp Pennsylvania in Kuwait (who) killed two Americans and was influenced by the MSU (Muslim Student Association), also Ali Muhammad a double agent that worked for the FBI and collaborated with Al-Qaeda
-- Speaking at the Air Force Academy in Colorado to expose the infiltration of Islamist, not only were over a hundred of Middle Eastern Muslims allowed to infiltrate, but were also allowed to threaten us with death with no repercussions whatsoever -- Omar Khalifa, a student, got away with the threats and while Khalifa was related to Osama Bin Laden's son-in-law, he was largely ignored!
-- At the Marines, our event was cancelled as to ‘not to offend Saudi visitors. At Camp Bullis was a Muslim in the U.S army who said he was ‘offended’ that I spoke on the issue of terrorism. Has ‘Political correctness’ seeped into our military apparatus to the point where no one can say anything lest they risk we offend someone? When Americans are being killed,all issues should be on the table.
-- The big question: Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome or Terrorism? Nidal never served in Iraq or Afghanistan to qualify as a candidate for Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome.
No comments:
Post a Comment