Search This Blog

Saturday, August 7, 2010

WHITE HOUSE NOT LEADERS BUT "WANNABE" CELEBRITY PROFLIGATES

"IF THEY DON'T HAVE BREAD LET THEM EAT CAKE" Queen Marie Antoinette of France before the Revolution, role model for the "nouveau riche", no class, Obama couple?



Knowing they are unlikely to be in office with a Democratic Senate and Congress to play with, they appear to be sucking out everything they can at our cost for their pleasure while they still can. Chicago street style.  She has already taken some SEVEN vacations just this summer!





Sacrifice is something that many Americans are becoming all too familiar with during this economic downturn. It was a key theme in President Obama's inaugural address to the nation, and he's referenced it numerous times when lecturing the country on how to get back on its feet.



But while most of the country is pinching pennies and downsizing summer sojourns - or forgoing them altogether - the Obamas don't seem to be heeding their own advice. While many of us are struggling, the First Lady is spending the next few days in a five-star hotel on the chic Costa del Sol in southern Spain with 40 of her "closest friends."



According to CNN, the group is expected to occupy 60 to 70 rooms, more than a third of the lodgings at the 160-room resort. Not exactly what one would call cutting back in troubled times.



Reports are calling the lodgings of Obama's Spanish fiesta, the Hotel Villa Padierna in Marbella, "luxurious," "posh" and "a millionaires' playground." Estimated room rate per night? Up to a staggering $2,500. Method of transportation? Air Force Two.



To be clear, what the Obamas do with their money is one thing; what they do with ours is another. Transporting and housing the estimated 70 Secret Service agents who will flank the material girl will cost the taxpayers a pretty penny. (Reportedly over $300,000 and closing beaches for them another $500,000 for Spain in loss of tourist revenue).



Perhaps it could be that the Obamas, who seem to fancy themselves more along the lines of international celebrities than actual leaders, espouse a different view of sacrifice.



When Michelle Obama accompanied her husband to Copenhagen along with best buddy Oprah Winfrey, she billed the trip - an ultimately unsuccessful bid to bring the Olympics to Chicago - as follows: "As much of a sacrifice as people say this is for me or Oprah or the President to come for these few days, so many of you in this room have been working for years to bring this bid home."



A quick jaunt to Denmark is a sacrifice? What portraits in courage!



The Obama modus operandi is becoming clear. From lavish trips to Spain to reportedly flying Bo, the President's Portuguese water dog, on a separate aircraft to vacation with them in Maine, to a date night in New York City that perhaps cost nearly $100,000, their idea of austerity is really just the lap of luxury, at least for ordinary folks.



Incredibly, the Obamas have long portrayed themselves as precisely such commoners. Just this month, Obama told ABC the First Couple is "not that far removed from what most Americans are going through." And that "it was just a few years ago that we had high credit card balances, we had two kids, thinking about college. We had our own retirement accounts, wondering if we were going to be able to get enough assets in there."



If that's true, why not select a more appropriate destination like the California coast? The scenery is just as gorgeous as that of Spain, and instead of patronizing a foreign country they would be pumping money into an American economy that desperately needs it.



 Camp David wouldn't exactly be slumming it, either.



A long weekend there would really send a message of responsibility, leadership and compassion. For a couple that has sharply criticized former President George W. Bush so widely, they could stand to follow his example for once and select a more low-key locale, as Bush regularly did in his Texas vacations.



Instead, Michelle Obama seems more like a modern-day Marie Antoinette - the French queen who spent extravagantly on clothes and jewels without a thought for her subjects' plight - than an average mother of two.



 While she's spent her time in the White House telling parents they should relieve their chubby kids' dependency on sugar and stressing the importance of an organic veggie garden, hopping a jet to Europe to meet with Spanish royalty isn't the visual the White House probably wants to project. Perhaps they've forgotten the damning image of John Kerry, on the eve of the 2004 election, windsurfing off the coast of Nantucket?



I don't begrudge anyone rest and relaxation when they work hard.



We all need downtime - the First Family included. It's the extravagance of Michelle Obama's trip and glitzy destination contrasted with President Obama's demonization of the rich that smacks of hypocrisy and perpetuates a disconnect between the country and its leaders.



Toning down the flash would humanize the Obamas and signify that they sympathize with the setbacks of the people they were elected to serve.



In January, President Obama insisted that "everybody in the country is going to have to sacrifice something, accept change for the greater good. Everybody is going to have to give. Everybody is going to have to have some skin in the game."



If sacrifice is the precursor to change, what will the family that ran on change offer up? Elitist doublespeak won't cut it. (Nor $140 a pound Kobe beef in their kitchens).



Tantaros (andrea@andreatantaros.com ) is a weekly contributor to the New York Daily News opinion section.





Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2010/08/04/2010-0804_material_girl_michelle_obama_is_a_modernday_marie_antoinette_on_a_glitzy_spanish.html?page=1#ixzz0vyZzeBPG

No comments:

Post a Comment