Search This Blog

Saturday, July 14, 2007

BAHRAIN A PROVINCE OF ISLAMIC IRAN

"Bahrain Iran’s province" claim sparks uproar!

Alan note: with Bahrain providing the USA with fleet facilities, Iran has constantly tried to destabilize that Persian Gulf State and has infiltrated thousands upon thousands of security/Intelligence and special forces (Qods Brigade) agents into Bahrein, using the indigenous and artificially created Shia Moslem communities as a launching pad.

The ideal aim would be to overthrow the current Sunni government and create a Shia accolyte for Iran. These actions are also a warning for other Gulf states where Islamic Iran has made huge inroads and wields increasingly "disruptive" influence.

As in Dubai, for instance where the old guard Mullahs and the Islamic Iranian regime both have huge investments, including a monopoly of human sex slave trade. Dubai acts as a paper clearing house to disguise and launder imports and exports, often of a sanctioned/forbidden kind, including technology.

One Islamic Iranian enclave in Nevada, reportedly still continues to actively trade sanctioned goods and technology into Iran via Dubai. And an American surgeon, whose license to practise in the USA may be in question, appears to use Dubai as a location to perform surgery on the Iranian regime's bigwigs and anyone else who can come up with the money. And has had affiliations with openly pro-Iran lobbyists for a long time.

By the way, here is a website which has appeared and is not yet clear as to whether it is a legitimate USA site or datramining by our enemies to see what we know and how many of their infiltrated agents we have discovered.

http://iranintelligence.org/

The upside of providing information on the Islamic "bad guys" outweighs the downside of playing into Iran's hands, so perhaps think accordingly.

Please send your comments or opinions on this or to identify the Islamic Regime bad guys - inside and outside Iran, to antimullah@hotmail.com

MANAMA: Claims by the editor of a hardline Iranian newspaper that Bahrain is part of Iran and should be returned have provoked uproar in the Gulf Arab island which is seeking an explanation from Tehran.


Hossein Shariatmadari, editor of conservative Iranian daily Kayhan, said in an article published on Monday that Bahrain was a province of non-Arab, Shiite Iran, and that Bahrainis were demanding the island’s return to its “native land”.

The comments caused a firestorm in Bahrain, which has a majority Shiite population but is ruled by a Sunni royal family, and threaten to escalate into a diplomatic spat.

“We are awaiting an official response from Iran on the ... Shariatmadari issue,” a Bahraini Foreign Ministry official who declined to be named told Reuters on Thursday.

Sectarian tensions have flared in Bahrain in the past, as Shiites complain of discrimination in jobs and services. Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, to whom Shariatmadari is considered close, is one of a number of religious leaders to whom Shiite Muslims look for guidance, although only a minority of Bahraini Shiites follow Khamenei.

Bahrain’s shura council, or upper chamber of parliament, condemned Shariatmadari’s comments. “The shura council in Bahrain has strongly deplored the irresponsible statements released by the advisor to Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and managing editor of Iranian daily Kayhan, Hossein Shariatmadari,” it said in a statement.

Bahrain is an ally of the United States and hosts the US navy’s Fifth Fleet, whose deployment of two aircraft carriers off Iranian waters in recent months has raised pressure on the Islamic Republic in its nuclear standoff with the West. Iran’s embassy in Bahrain said Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki would address the issue during a trip to the tiny Gulf Arab kingdom on Friday.

It was not clear whether Shariatmadari’s comments triggered the visit. Embassy spokesman Abulghasem Vafaei distanced Iranian policy from Shariatmadari, saying he did not advise Iran’s leadership in foreign affairs. “This article is completely his personal view, it is not related to any official. This man is a journalist, not an adviser in foreign policy,” he said.

1 comment:

  1. Dear Alan,
    Here's what I could find out: The website http://iranintelligence.org/ resolves to IP address:195.249.40.182.

    I believe the server is located in Denmark [City: Koege, Roskilde].

    But the domain name was registered in California

    Domain ID:D120665391-LROR
    Domain Name:IRANINTELLIGENCE.ORG
    Created On:19-Apr-2006 08:45:29 UTC
    Last Updated On:19-Jun-2006 04:35:46 UTC
    Expiration Date:19-Apr-2008 08:45:29 UTC
    Sponsoring Registrar:Tucows Inc. (R11-LROR)
    Status:OK
    Registrant ID:tuI3YCJAxVeQh0OH
    Registrant Name:Iran Intelligence Agency
    Registrant Organization:Iran Intelligence Agency
    Registrant Street1:10522 South Brackton Ave #2
    Registrant Street2:
    Registrant Street3:
    Registrant City:Los Angeles Ca
    Registrant State/Province:US
    Registrant Postal Code:90025
    Registrant Country:US
    Registrant Phone:+10.736396806
    Registrant Phone Ext.:
    Registrant FAX:
    Registrant FAX Ext.:
    Registrant Email:customer@cliche.se
    Admin ID:tuI3YCJAxVeQh0OH
    Admin Name:Iran Intelligence Agency
    Admin Organization:Iran Intelligence Agency
    Admin Street1:10522 South Brackton Ave #2
    Admin Street2:
    Admin Street3:
    Admin City:Los Angeles Ca
    Admin State/Province:US
    Admin Postal Code:90025
    Admin Country:US
    Admin Phone:+10.736396806
    Admin Phone Ext.:
    Admin FAX:
    Admin FAX Ext.:
    Admin Email:customer@cliche.se
    Tech ID:tujsiYf3o52HpH9O
    Tech Name:Morten Bonavent
    Tech Organization:Cliche Webhosting
    Tech Street1:Box 440
    Tech Street2:
    Tech Street3:
    Tech City:Malmoe
    Tech State/Province:SE
    Tech Postal Code:20124
    Tech Country:SE
    Tech Phone:+46.040305537
    Tech Phone Ext.:
    Tech FAX:+46.040305547
    Tech FAX Ext.:
    Tech Email:hostmaster@cliche.se
    Name Server:NS1.CLICHE.SE
    Name Server:NS2.CLICHE.SE

    ReplyDelete