Wednesday, December 31, 2008
RADICAL ANTI-CHRISTIAN ON OBAMA TRANSITION TEAM
SHE WORKS FOR GOOGLE, WHICH APPEARS TO HAVE SET UP A TRIAGE OR FILTER OF WHERE BLOGS OR ARTICLES APPEAR ON GOOGLE SEARCHES SO THAT THEY CAN BE "restricted" AND NOT APPEAR NEAR THE TOP IF SOMEONE AT GOOGLE DECIDES THEY WANT TO BURY THEM.
IS THIS WHY FOR A WHILE GOOGLE SEARCHES HAD OBAMA ARTICLES "DISAPPEAR" IF THEY WERE LESS THAN POSITIVE?
IS THIS WHY FOR SOME TIME ANTI-JIHADIST ISLAMIC OR ANTI-ISLAMIC IRAN'S CLERICS ARTICLES NO LONGER SHOWED UP NEAR THE TOP WHERE THEY HAD ALWAYS BEEN?
GOOGLE'S POWER HAS ALWAYS BEEN THERE, EVEN-HANDED AND PROVIDING THE GOOD AND THE BAD AND LETTING THE PIECES FALL WHERE THEY MIGHT.
SOME MONTHS AGO THIS CHANGED NOTICEABLY, SPECIALLY WITH OBAMA AND ISLAMISM RELATED ARTICLES. BLOG STATISTICS SHOW AND SUPPORT THIS OPINION.
THEN GOOGLE FORMALLY ANNOUNCED THEIR POLICY CHANGE TO INCLUDE THEIR TRIAGE/FILTER POLICY.
HOW SAD!
EXCEPT IN EXTENT WHAT IS DIFFERENT IN THIS THAN THE CENSORSHIP TO BE FOUND IN IRAN, WHERE ANOTHER NEWSPAPER WAS CLOSED DOWN YESTERDAY, BECAUSE SOMEONE DID NOT LIKE WHAT THEY PRINTED?
GOOGLE, PLEASE RECONSIDER AND REMOVE THE "PERSONAL POLITICS" OF THOSE IN YOUR ORGANIZATION FROM YOUR POLICIES AND SOFTWARE TO AVOID THIS KIND OF TANTAMOUNT CENSORSHIP OF A FORUM PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AND RESPECTED AND ENJOYED FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND OPINION.
************************************************************************
By Publicola December 31, 2008
A transition team advisor to President-elect Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. is a member of a radical foreign political party, Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP), a group which seeks to expel Christianity and Christians from Indian society.
Sonal Shah, an employee of Google, Inc., the search engine developer, in Silicon Valley, is a former leading policy maker for VHP, serving on the party’s governing council.
She is developing technology policy for Obama.
The VHP is an international Hindu organization that is part of Sangh Parivar, the Indian nationalist movement organized around Hindutva, or Hindu nationalism.
VHP has been condemned by the nonprofit group Human Rights Watch and the U.S. State Department for its role in the 2002 violence in the northwestern state of Gujarat that killed more than 1,000 people.
Exposed by the press earlier this month, Shah issued a statement renouncing the VHP.
But, as recently as 2004, Shah made a speech for the party in which she denounced “the hypocrisy of the Western way of life,” and called for a return to a simple, agrarian way of living, as in the ancient world.
Which is an interesting, if paradoxical, statement for someone who works for one of the world’s leading high tech companies to make. But, such is Obamunism.
On Dec. 5, a coalition of more than 60 U.S. academics, many working in South Asian-related fields, sent a letter to Obama expressing their concern over Shah’s appointment and the increasing influence of Hindu nationalism in America.
Alan note: Hindu nationalism has nothing wrong with it until it becomes an anti-Western activism, where the rise of it comes from climbing over the destroyed shoulders or bodies of the host country.
Indians are a highly intelligent people with a high level of technical skills and abilities, so it's sad that they should be represented or misrepresented by someone who is so radical and set to support a still politically unclarified person like Obama, the Mullahs or anyone else at such high cost - censorship of opposing views.
KHASHM IS RIGHT
Alan Note: Increasingly the Persian language media in America, specially TV stations have been infiltrated, corrupted or "bought" by the Mullahs and because the most relevant channel for an overthrow of the bloody clerical regime in "islamic iran" is still the Monarchy and the late-Shah's son Reza Pahlavi, a concerted effort has taken place to discredit not only the monarchy but also officers loyal to the Shah.
This TV station, allegedly working hand in glove with the Mullahs, has in the past also given a forum to a couple of former, inept but treacherous military Generals to take apart and discredit senior Iranian officers living in the USA using these military shills to do so.
In the past, the Mullah's effort was focused on discrediting the MEK, (Mojaheddin-e Khalgh) - and still is, as this group, labeled a terrorist organization in the USA but accepted as a resistance movement in England and France, has an tangible cult like set up with devoted followers - who hate the Mullahs. And many of them have had military training.
They, and the Fedayeen, under Soviet direction were the real owners of the Khomeini revolution and would have turned Iran into a Marxist-Islamic, pro-USSR territory.
When the Shah's government came apart, the only remaining national communication network with a traditional oversight of the populace were the mosques and the clerics. They were everywhere around the country and were happy to snatch power and form neighborhood "committees" to run them under their ignorant, superstitious guidance..
The "atheist" Marxist-Islamists who used Islam as a recruiting source not a philosophy found themselves shouldered aside and later on slaughtered in the tens of thousands on Khomeini's orders.
But I digress. This post of an angry letter to a Persian TV station intends to bring attention to how deeply the Mullahs have infiltrated the Mass Media in the USA and Europe and influence the Persian diaspora and successfully ruin the reputations of those who might become an effective leader against them.
Executions in Iran, the official ones, are now in groups, ten or more at a time. Too many kills required to do it one at a time.
The unoffical ones from within the depths of some 100 or more "unofficlal" or unsanctioned PRISONS die unofficially. Often sadistically.
They are not taken out and strung by the neck till they choke to death. Instead they frequently get taken out into some deserted spot and shot to death. SLOWLY!
Or if the prison building permits, right there on the spot.
The first shots hit the victims feet and ankles, breaking bone but not hitting any vital point. Other bullets gradually hit other parts of the legs and knees and then pierce and break bones in the thighs and then the shoulders. Always inflicting pain but never bringing the panacea, yes, solace of death.
Eventually, the shattered body gives up and dies. This is a Mullah game practised all over the country by the para-military, personal "security", groups who report officially to nobody in a formal government position but informally to one of the Mullah or Revolutionary Guard or Bassiji bigwigs they choose to follow.
These are the people who pollute the Media and sow disinformation about Islam as a religion of peace instead of the body pieces it really is. So Persian TV stations like Pars should be aware that they cannot go on indefinitely serving the Mullahs without facing the consequences when they are gone. And gone they will be.
Even, perhaps, sooner than you think. The confluence of various streams of activity are ensuring this.
And you Bahram Moshiri, nicknamed the "Camel" for your features, why have you decided to be even more of a flake than you used to be back in Iran? Yes, there are those who may still remember.
Allegations against you from Iran mention your stint as a police lieutentant, where you were reportedly fired for allegedly raping a woman in your precinct while you were the duty officer.
They indicate your openly ardent pro-Soviet traitor Mossadegh political mindsets. These can legitimately color your thoughts but should not be made apparent through a dirty mouth.
Other reports allege you were involved in providing opium to prominent persons in the USA and also being a user yourself.
See, this is what it feels like to be similarly yet apparently validly disparaged. So why do it to others? People in glass houses should not throw stones.
Specially those who are truly so much higher and better than you.
IRANIAN MONARCHIST MOVEMENT
Dear Mr. Shajareh:
This letter is regarding our conversation on Sunday December 28, 2008 regarding one of the hosts on your Television Station Pars TV, by the name Bahram Moshiri and how this gentleman over the past months has not only belittled the Shah of Iran but has tried to tarnish the Iranian history as well. As you are well aware on his program last week he has taken his actions to the extreme by using foul language and insulting a large number of the Iranian community.
We are well aware that there have been a storm of complaints that have come to you and Pars TV you yourself promised me that the named gentleman will apologize to your viewers for his foul language on his show but we have still not seen any such apology.
As we discussed in our conversation democracy does not mean that one can open his mouth and use language that is inappropriate for young viewers and families watching your programs. Democracy does not mean hate mongering and lying. We demand that this gentleman apologize for his irresponsible behavior and stop this line of programming since he is only pleasing the mullahs running the terrorist regime in Iran by spreading his lies.
We believe this kind of behavior does not comply with the FCC regulations.
Sincerely,
Amir Hakim
Secretary General
Khashm Organization U.S.A
468 North Camden Dr. Suite 204 Beverly Hills, CA 90210
KhashmOrg@aol.com
Fax: (310) 204-SHAH
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
DETAILS PRO & CON POLARIK - must read
Just as Dr. Polarik, an SME (subject matter expert) went into great detail to demonstrate Obama's proffered "Certification of LIve Birth" (not Certificate) was bogus, he also went into equal detail to show how a detractor on Obama's spin team, falsely tried to nay-say and obfuscate the facts with lie after lie.
Great read for anyone who wants ALL the details about the Obama "document".
To save space and facilitate reading, graphics in Dr. Polarik's documents have the HTML code instead of the actual graphics. To view them copy and paste the links into your browser.
DEC 02 FULL DETAILS
DEC 18 FULL DETAILS
Monday, December 29, 2008
THE THREE PATRIOT SONGS
BTW
In a few short days, an African American man will move from his private residence into a much larger and infinitely more expensive one owned not by him but by the taxpayers.
A vast lawn, a perimeter fence and many well trained security specialists will insulate him from the rest of us but the mere fact that this man will be residing in this house should make us all stop and count or blessings - because it proves that we live in a nation where anything is possible.
Many believed this day would never come. Most of us hoped and prayed that it would, but few of us actually believed we would live to see it.
Racism is an ugly thing in all of it's forms and there is little doubt that if this man had moved into this house fifteen years ago, there would have been a great outcry - possibly even rioting in the streets. Today, we can all be both grateful and proud that no such mayhem will take place.when this man takes up residency in this house.
This man, moving into this house at this time in our nation's history is much more than a simple change of addresses for him - it is proof of a change in our attitude as a nation. It is an amends of sorts - the righting of a great wrong. It is a symbol of our growth, and of our willingness to "judge a man, not by the color of his skin but by the content of his character".
There can be little doubt now that the vast majority of us truly believe that this man has earned both his place in history and his new address. His time in this house will not be easy - it will be fraught with danger and he will face many challenges. I am sure there will be ma ny times when he asks himself how in the world he ended up here and like all who have gone before him, the experience will age him greatly.
But I for one will not waste an ounce of worry for his sake - because in every way a man can, he asked for this. His whole life for the past fifteen years appears to have been inexorably leading this man toward this house.
It is highly probable that that in the past, despite all of his actions, racism would have kept this man out of this house.
Today, I thank the lord above that I am an American and that I live in a nation where wrongs are righted, where justice matters and where truly anything is possible.
Who is this man? you ask. You think you know, don't you?
Jail House, Nevada
THE BIG PICTURE SCOTUS v. OBAMA
Alan note: Many on both sides of the aisle and of varying political preferences have grown bored or even angry at any mentions of the lawsuits against Obama.
They don't want to know because they DO NOT KNOW that though it seems over - IT IS NOT. There are still many a slip between the cup and the lip.
Ok—Now I see the big picture! Part 1
by Tom Waite
In my previous analysis of the Berg v. Obama Supreme Court case, I said that the Supreme Court Justices were very sly by scheduling a January 9th conference date in order to discuss Berg’s writ of certiorari.
Because just one day earlier, congress is to open up the Electoral College’s sealed votes from each state, count the votes and declare a presidential winner.
But now there is a new development, which seems very perplexing at first but I believe I can shed light on this news and reinterpret it as a sign of political chess.
The new development is that on December 18, 2008 Berg filed an injunction (to stay the congressional electoral vote count on January 8, 2009 until Barack Obama proves his qualifications, i.e. that he was born in U.S.A.) and he submitted it to Justice Antonin Scalia.
Now the very perplexing news is that this injunction has been granted a conference date of January 16, 2009!
I know—you’re all rubbing your eyes in disbelief and also when you put into context that the inauguration is on the 20th of January, I have no doubt that you’re saying, what the ****!?
Whenever I try to type a website on my comments, I never get posted, so I’ll creatively refer you to the following website, type in three ‘W’s’ and then a dot and then type ‘americasright’ then a dot and finally type ‘com’.
Read the story ‘Berg’s Application for Injunction Curiously Moves On at Supreme Court’ under Tuesday, December 23, 2008.
Jeff Schreiber (the person running this blog), is a law student and he can’t fathom the reasoning behind the Supreme Court’s decision to set a date to discuss Berg’s injunction that is well after the time congress will have counted the Electoral College’s votes.
In doing so, Jeff feels this conference on January 16, 2009 to discuss Berg’s injunction will be a moot issue.
However, I see it differently. The Justices of the Supreme Court aren’t sequestered in some castle. The Justices know exactly what the issues are and are constantly being bombarded with similar legal applications to be considered regarding Barack Obama’s eligibility for president.
As I’ve mentioned in a previous post, if the Justices wanted to dismiss Berg’s writ of certiorari they could have but they deliberately chose to discuss it 24 hours after congress officially counts the Electoral College’s votes; reason being, Berg’s issue of standing will then be valid.
Once Obama officially wins the national vote (via the counting of Electoral College’s votes), Berg’s issue of harm being done to him by Obama now becomes legally valid. It is no longer theoretical; thus Berg does have legal standing.
Now in a political game of chess, the Supreme Court’s manoeuvring of the January 9th date to discuss Berg’s writ of certiorari can be seen as a chess move of "check" against Obama.
Obama is now in a corner but still can move his king chess piece and similarly with the writ of certiorari, Obama still could refuse to deliver evidence proving he was born in United States.
I understand why the Justices set a date one week later (January 16) to discuss Berg’s injunction to stop congress from counting the Electoral College’s votes, this move can be seen as check and mate!
Meaning Obama’s king can’t move in any direction on the chessboard, thus he’s trapped and has lost the game!
Setting a date to discuss the injunction on preventing congress from counting the Electoral College’s votes isn’t a moot issue; in this context any judgement is retroactive!
So that even if congress has counted the Electoral College’s votes and have declared Obama the presidential winner; if the Supreme Court finds Obama ineligible to be a presidential candidate, they can retroactively cancel the results of the January 8th Electoral College’s vote count!
And that’s why the Supreme Court is allowing for a January 16th conference on Berg’s injunction to stop congress from counting the Electoral College’s vote on January 8th.
It’s not a moot issue, it’s a very deliberate political game of entrapment or as in chess it can be seen as a move of checkmate. Because the Supreme Court is basically giving Obama no wiggle room to manoeuvre and escape from the January 9th’s conference of Berg’s writ of certiorari.
The Supreme Court is ultimately saying to Obama, if you don’t hand over your evidence to us on January 9th, you will be forced to hand over your evidence to us on January 16th, otherwise we’ll retroactively cancel the results from the Electoral College’s votes that were counted back on January 8th!
Ok—Now I see the big picture! Part 2
So now I see the big picture and the ultimate endgame that the Supreme Court has in mind for Barack Obama.
Just like in chess, the winner is the person who sees many moves in advance; in this case the winner is the Supreme Court!
They’ve set a checkmate legal trap for Obama, whereby even if there are no objections by any members of congress, the Electoral College’s votes are counted and Obama is declared the presidential winner on January 8th.
The Supreme Court has deliberately chosen to wait until January 9th to discuss Berg’s writ of certiorari, whereby Berg’s legal standing (harm that can be done to him by Obama) becomes valid!
And finally, the Supreme Court has made it perfectly clear to Obama by its deliberate action of allowing for a January 16th conference regarding Berg’s injunction to stop congress in counting the Electoral College’s votes; that unless he hands over his evidence to them on January 9th—they’ll retroactively cancel the Electoral College’s voting results from January 8th!
I’m smiling so much now because all this time Barack Obama has hired teams of lawyers to go to court and ask to dismiss all these lawsuits that have one similar theme—show proof you were born in the United States.
But now because just one of these ‘nuisance’ cases (as Obama sees it) has made it to the Supreme Court, the Justices have already out manoeuvred Obama and his team of high priced attorneys.
First, they’ve cornered Obama with a move of check by setting a conference date of January 9th (24 hours after congress counts the Electoral College’s votes) to discuss Berg’s writ of certiorari; the case can’t be dismissed—Berg will have legal standing!
And finally the Supreme Court has made its devastating move of checkmate by allowing a conference on January 16th to discuss Berg’s injunction to stop congress in counting the Electoral College’s votes!
There’s no more wriggle room left for Obama because essentially it’s a fait accompli by January 9th for him to hand over his evidence to the Justices otherwise, if he doesn’t comply by January 16th, the Justices’ will have it within their power to retroactively cancel the results from the January 8th Electoral College’s vote count!
So Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the Supreme Court—well guess what? Obama—you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
Sunday, December 28, 2008
LIVING EXAMPLE (SORRY, DEAD EXAMPLE) OF MOHAMMEDAN ISLAM
A suicide car bomb in Afghanistan today killed 14 primary school children in what officials said was a failed attempt to blow up a meeting of tribal elders.
;">
The blast, in the country's eastern Khost province, also killed an Afghan army soldier and a security guard, and injured 58, including at least 40 civilians, the US army said.
Video footage of the bombing, taken from a security camera, shows a group of children, apparently returning from school, walking alongside a road that had a checkpoint guarding a district centre.
A dark-coloured 4x4 vehicle is seen snaking through the barriers placed on the approach to the checkpoint, before detonating just as it drew level with the children.
"It's absolutely blatant. Children walking past, and then they detonate the vehicle bomb," said a spokesman for the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) in Afghanistan. "The driver was able to see the children, there's no doubt about that at all."
The violence that stalks the entire region was underlined by a separate suicide bombing today in neighbouring Pakistan, close to the Afghan border. The attack, which killed at least 30 people, comes as tensions between India and Pakistan brings the threat of war closer.
In Khost, the children killed were aged between 8 and 10, according to a Abdul Rahman, a doctor at a hospital near the blast.
;">
Photographs of the suicide bombing's aftermath showed bloodied text books lying on the ground beside small pairs of shoes. It came on the last day of school for the year. Students had been to school to receive end-of-year certificates.
"The brutality and disregard for human life by terrorists is sickening, as I continue to witness innocent men, women and children being killed and maimed in the pursuit of this pointless insurgency," said General David McKiernan, commander of Isaf and US forces in Afghanistan.
The intended target of the Khost bomber is likely to have been a meeting of tribal elders, called to discuss security issues, that was taking place inside the compound that the vehicle was approaching.
;">
In Pakistan, the militants struck at a polling station in Buner, in the country's troubled north-west. An explosive-laden car rammed into a queue of people waiting to vote in a byelection.
Buner lies next to Swat, a valley in which the Pakistani army has been in a full-scale operation against Taliban-linked insurgents for over a year.
The suicide attacker pulled his car outside the polling station, and asked people to push the vehicle, saying that it had broken down, said Iftikhar Hussain, a minister in the North West Frontier Province regional government.
"His purpose was to gather the maximum people around the car. The moment people started pushing the car, he blew it up," Hussain said, adding that the attacker's message was that "it is not possible to hold a peaceful election" in Pakistan.
The latest violence in Pakistan north -west comes as the country is pulling troops out of the area, in order to redeploy them along its eastern frontier with India. Since Mumbai was attacked last month by terrorists, who Delhi says came from Pakistan, the two countries have faced-off in an ever more tense confrontation.
It is feared that the movement of troops in Pakistan will divert its army's attention from the threat of Taliban extremists in its western region and inside the Federally Administered Tribal Area (Fata), which borders Afghanistan. These militants have been targeting Pakistani forces in Pakistan and the international coalition across the border in Afghanistan.
"For Islamabad, the threat posed by terrorists operating out of Fata and from along the western border to this country's internal security and stability is no less tangible; it just cannot afford to redeploy any large number of its troops on the eastern border, leaving the 'wild' west in a free fall," Pakistan's Dawn newspaper said in an editorial published today.
Thursday, December 25, 2008
BARACK OBAMA NOT SO COOL
"Barack Obama is on the phone screaming at me."
There's a lot of new, fresh, eye-opening anecdotes in this long article on Obama as a state legislator by Todd Spivak of the Houston Press. But in light of today's story of Obama's near-physical altercation, this anecdote of Obama's temper is interesting:
It's not quite eight in the morning and Barack Obama is on the phone screaming at me. He liked the story I wrote about him a couple weeks ago, but not this garbage.
Months earlier, a reporter friend told me she overheard Obama call me an asshole at a political fund-raiser. Now here he is blasting me from hundreds of miles away for a story that just went online but hasn't yet hit local newsstands.
It's the first time I ever heard him yell, and I'm trembling as I set down the phone. I sit frozen at my desk for several minutes, stunned...
In a follow-up report published a couple weeks later, I wrote about these disgruntled black legislators and the central role Senate President Emil Jones played in Obama's revived political life.
The morning after the story was posted online, I arrived early at my new offices. I hadn't taken my coat off when the phone rang. It was Obama.
The article began, "It can be painful to hear Ivy League-bred Barack Obama talk jive."
Obama told me he doesn't speak jive, that he doesn't say the words "homeboy" or "peeps."
It seemed so silly; I thought for sure he was joking. He wasn't.
He said the black legislators I cited in the story were off-base, and that they couldn't have gotten the bills passed without him.
I started to speak, and he shouted me down.
He said he liked the other story I wrote.
I asked if there was anything factually inaccurate about the latest story.
(LIKE WHO IS YOUR DADDY?)
He repeated that his former colleagues couldn't have passed the bills without him.
He asked why I wrote this story, then cut me off when I started to answer.
He said he should have been given a chance to respond.
I told him I had requested an interview through his communications director.
He said I should have called his cell phone.
I reminded him that he had asked me months ago to stop calling his cell phone due to his busier schedule.
He said again that I should have called his cell phone.
Today I no longer have Obama's cell phone number. I submitted two formal requests to interview Obama for this story through his Web site, but have not heard back. I also e-mailed interview requests to three of his top staffers, but none responded.
Maybe he'll call the day after this story runs. I'll get to the office early just in case. And this time I'll have my recorder ready.
Again, my point from the earlier post stands. I don't think Obama is a hothead, or flies off the handle with any degree of frequency. It's entirely possible - nay, likely - that many of us, in Obama's shoes, would want to take a swing at state legislator Rickey Hendon as well.
But the Washington Post did a front page story on McCain's temper, leading with an anecdote of Bob Kerrey breaking up a near-fight between McCain and Sen. Chuck Grassley in 1992.
Too bad Bob Kerrey says the account is false, that Grassley and McCain worked out the emotional issue at hand among themselves, and that the Post never contacted him.
In Mendell's book, we find a near mirror-image of that McCain temper anecdote. The book has been in print since last year, and no major media organization has found the story of Obama "ready to throw punches" worth mentioning.
The image of an angry Obama being restrained by others doesn't mesh well with the smooth, calm, confident, always-at-ease, ready-for-the-moment image we're being sold.
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that Obama's fans in the press want to avert their eyes.
AND FOR THOSE WHO BELIEVE HIS PROMISES
AS FOR HIS WAR ON TERROR TOGETHER WITH HONORARY AYATOLLAH BIDEN
AND WITH SOME 20 LAWSUITS PENDING AGAINST HIM,
THIS MAY NEVER HAPPEN
MONEY FROM DOING WHAT?
Don't you really mean from Soros, Saudi Arabia as well as Islamic and Communist
organizations?Maybe you should go back to;
YOU DHIMMIS (ISLAMIC APOLOGISTS) READ AND AWAKE
Hand amputation, crucifixion, lashes and execution
By Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook
Hamas members of the Palestinian Legislative Council in Gaza have approved a new bill "to implement Koranic punishments," including hand amputation, crucifixion, corporal punishment and execution.
Drinking, owning or producing wine is punished by 40 lashes, while drinking in public adds three months' imprisonment. Several laws are directed against Hamas's Palestinian rivals, including a law intended to inhibit non-Hamas negotiators by sentencing to death anyone who was "appointed to negotiate with a foreign government on a Palestinian issue and negotiated against Palestinians' interest."
The following is the description as it appears today on the Al Arabiya website:
Headline: Hamas approves law of punishment by lashes, amputating hands, crucifying, and execution -- in order to implement the Islamic Sharia law.
Hamas members of the Palestinian Legislative Council approved in its meeting in Gaza a new bill proposed by the Hamas who have a majority in the Legislative Council, whose purpose is "to implement Koranic punishments."
The newspaper Al Hayat of London reported on Dec. 24, 2008, that this step is seen as unprecedented, and has brought criticism and concern from human rights organizations in the Gaza Strip, especially as this law includes punishments by lashes, cutting off of hands, crucifixion, and execution...
The language of the law proposes "primary and secondary" laws. Primary laws include: "Koranic laws, blood revenge, lashes, crucifixion, and execution ..."
The text stresses: "These punishments will not be canceled or pardoned ... except if pardoned by the victim himself...
Section 59 of the law establishes that "punishment of death will be enacted on any Palestinian who intentionally does one of the following:
Raised a weapon against Palestine on behalf of the enemy during war,
was appointed to negotiate with a foreign government on a Palestinian issue and negotiated against Palestinians' interest,
performed a hostile action against a foreign country in a way that endangers Palestine in war or in harming political relations,
served a foreign army in time of war, advised or helped soldiers to enlist in this army,
weakened the spirit or the force of resistance of the people, or spied against Palestine especially during war."
The punishment of lashes appears in many sections of the law.
Section 84 states that: "Whoever drinks wine, owns or produces wine will be punished with 40 lashes if he is Muslim, and anyone who drinks wine, or angers another p erson [with wine], or causes him distress when drinking wine in a public place, or goes to a public place while drunk, will be punished with no less than 40 lashes and imprisonment for the minimum of three months."
[Al-Arabiya, Dec. 24, 2008]
http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2008/12/24/62699.html
H.M. QUEEN ELIZABETH'S CHRISTMAS MESSAGE
From the Music Room in Buckingham Palace
And to think that Channel 4 News invited murderer, thug, low-life islamic iran "president", Ahmaghi-Nejad the Turd to broadcast a Christmas message, when he is executing Christians for being Christians and persecuting those he does not kill on the flimsiest of excuses.
And the theme of his message is that Jesus would be against "bullying" by western governments. What a farce.
Apostasy for switching to Christianity (or any other peaceful faith) from islam's faith, not of peace but body pieces, is an easy one as being born in Iran (except for Armenians, Assyrians and Jews) renders you automatically a Moslem. And a death sentence.
For those minorities above, or their priests and pastors, "disturbing the peace" or "activity against the regime", without requiring any further proof than the accusation, then being dragged into the kangaroo "religious" courts where a Mullah rules as he pleases, facts not withstanding, happy to remove a non-Moslem from this world or remove him from his family and thus take away their breadwinner.
Is it God's plan to allow the islamist activists to grow to such a proportion that we have no choice but to rise up against them? Like excising a deadly cancer that without surgery will kill us.
In the reverse way that the iranian Turd president believes he has to cause enough pain, suffering, death, oppression and disaster in the world, to get his 12th Imam's attention (to emerge from the well into which he disappeared as a boy 1,400 years ago) and have him return to redeem the globe and turn it into one big islamic caliphate.
Good grief! When are we going to wake up?
MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HANUKKAH - HAVE A HAPPY, PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR
Wednesday, December 24, 2008
IMPEACH (THEN) SENATOR OBAMA PETITION
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
WORLD UNDER OBAMA'S RULE (latest)
Alan Note: Learn more about Obama and his scam from this writer than all the rest put together, other than those who showed Obama's "certification" (not "certificate") of live birth is a forgery and a fraud.
At the end there are links to several other articles by this writer, published in Pravda.
Yesterday we posted Mysterious Shadow - Code Name Obama (scroll down a couple of articles)
The following article by Mark McGrew is fresh off the press and has yet to be published in his usual venue of Pravda (where it will also appear rapidly)
The World Under Obama’s Rule
Mark S. McGrew
Barack Obama, AKA Barry Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Sutoro, Barack Soetoro is a liar, a con man and a fraud.
Please don’t take my word for it. Take his. Click here for 158 documented lies.
He’s a con man because he is making promises that he can’t keep. He has already proven he conned the voters by his chosen cabinet and staff. The World is beginning to realize that he has not changed anything.
But the World is going to find out that his chosen associates to help him, as he says in his own words “Rule” over America, are by far the very worst that America has to offer. They will make the Bush and Clinton administrations look like Boy Scouts.
America’s major media has protected him, lied for him, slandered and libeled his Presidential opponents and viciously attacked and labeled anyone who questions his value as “Conspiracy Nuts”.
That is about to change. America’s major media has as a sole function, not to report the news, but to shape public opinion. During his campaign, they shaped Obama into a patient and compassionate gift from Heaven.
Now, slowly, they are asking questions about him. Soon, they will shape his image into a hideous beast beyond comprehension.
The evidence is available to prove that his ideals, his policies and his stated goals are to transform America into something the Nazis could only dream about: Youth Corps, Forced labor, socialism for the rich, paid for by the poor, military in America’s streets, all leading to complete absolute domination over the American people.
America’s people will not and are not accepting Obama. The American media is just now realizing that American’s are nowhere near as ignorant and complacent as they thought. And they are learning that World leaders are beginning to question Obama’s desires for the World.
The major media in America will now begin to show why it would be best not to have Obama and his crew in power and Americans will be begging for it to be anything other than what Obama is offering.
It is impossible for Barry Obama to assume the position of President of the United States. It is against the Rights of man, throughout the World, throughout history.
Yes, there have been usurpers, pretenders, imposters, liars, cheats and bunko artists taking over Nations. But they don’t last very long and generally many of their policies are reversed by the next generation of leaders.
If Obama were to take the Oath of Office and become President of the United States of America, and later found to be ineligible under the US Constitution to be President, Americans will suffer in many ways. But equally so, or more so, the entire civilization of the World will suffer.
If Obama is not qualified, nothing he signs will be legitimate. Agencies of Federal, State and Local governments can ignore him. Any Nation on Earth can rescind any agreements he makes with them. And vice versa, future administrations of America can renege on any agreement made that suits their whims.
The United States House of Representatives and the Senate have a duty and took an Oath to defend and protect the US Constitution. If they have not done that, then they also are an illegitimate government and have absolutely no authority to act on behalf of the American People.
Any agreements or laws they pass will be illegal. Ambassadors, Secretary of State, Embassy officials all over the World will be rendered sterile.
No Nation, no leader, no military, no corporation and no other entity on Earth will be able to trust the continuity of America’s trustworthiness. And again, vice versa, any entity will have no obligation to abide by their commitments to America.
The American Constitution is the root of a tree, grown in the soil of Biblical principles, expressed as God’s words in the Ten Commandments. These Ten Commandments are similar to the instructions given to mankind thousands of years ago by all of the World’s religions.
All laws are a branch of the Constitution. The US Constitution does not “give” Rights to Americans. It delegates to the elected officials, to protect and preserve those Rights, which were given to all mankind, of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. No governing body in America can legally take away those Rights. If a government does take away those Rights and replace them with “Privileges” then life is worth only what the government says it is.
At their Will, they can determine if you shall be granted the privilege to continue living if they don’t like what you speak or print or what God you choose to worship. In a society like that, in these modern times, not one Nation on Earth is safe from attack and not one human being can be comfortable knowing he will be alive to see the next day.
That is one small reason why the Constitution of The United States of America can not be altered to accommodate a man who is not eligible to be President under the terms of the Constitution. If we relinquish one Right, the traitors in government will take the rest of them.
The Constitution has no mention of a protected Right for the “Will of the People” to override any part of the Constitution. Anyone who preaches that the Will of the People comes first is a lying traitor and should be shot.
American politicians and major media people are fond of saying, “We are a Nation of laws”. They are idiots. And they are traitors, not only to the American people but to any peoples of the World who desire trust and peace in their dealings with others.
Any politician’s efforts to allow a person to take the Office of the President, who can not prove he is eligible is the highest violation of their Oath to defend and protect the Constitution. Anyone who violates the US Constitution has no authority to represent it.
Nothing they say, nothing they do, no words, no actions, no thoughts, dreams or desires will have no more legitimate importance to the World than a mosquito dying in a swamp.
The only thing that backs up the American dollar is Trust. There is
no gold, silver, petroleum, or anything tangible that gives the American dollar a value.
Only “The Full Faith and Trust” of the United States government provides a value to the American dollar. If that trust is destroyed, the American financial system and the American economy will collapse and inevitably morph into something else.
The current multi-trillion dollar bailouts do exhibit that the governing powers in America do not want the Full Faith and Trust of America to be lost. The American government is doing everything in their power to ensure that the World knows that they are worthy of that Faith and Trust.
To allow a usurper to take control over America would destroy what the government is doing to maintain their integrity. I do not believe that they will allow that to happen.
But adhering to the major media’s modus operandi, they will tell us slowly, plant seeds of doubt about Obama, question thoughtfully on the air, pretend to be just realizing the mistake they made, gently debating with each other and gradually lead us to the point of acceptance. They will expertly “Shape” our opinion so that we will all accept that Obama is not qualified and will not be granted the Presidency.
If I am wrong, it won’t be the first time. If I am wrong, I am right that the World’s populations will suffer.
Dr. Orly Taitz’s Esq. representing military and former military plaintiffs, filed a lawsuit against the California Secretary of State asking her to NOT certify the Electoral College votes for Obama. One of the reasons for the request, is that one of the 55 Democratic Electors of the Electoral College representing Congressman Berman and submitted to the Secretary of State, Mrs.Ilene Huber was……deceased and has been for eight years. This is on page 16 and 17 of her lawsuit.
Any military or former military personnel are welcome to join her lawsuit by signing this Military Consent Form.
ACORN is notorious for phony voter registration, but for the Democratic Party to list an 8 year old corpse as someone who is eligible to vote for the President of The United States would indicate a deceitfulness beyond comprehension. By using a long dead, worm eaten body to get a vote, they prove that they have absolutely no respect for anything.
Barack Obama, by not responding to a lawsuit by Former Deputy State Attorney General for Pennsylvania, Phillip Berg, legally and effectively admitted fraud by not responding to that lawsuit.
If Obama can not prove he is eligible to become President of the United States of America, he will further have committed fraud against an unknown number of campaign contributors in the amount of more or less than 1 Billion dollars.
Obama raised close to $1,000,000,000 for a job that pays maybe $400,000. Obama would have to work for 2,500 years to pay that money back if he used his entire salary to make the payments. Or, for 5,000 years if he wanted to eat now and then.
If he is not eligible, he may and should be put in jail for the rest of his life and every penny to his name should be confiscated. Every person who aided and promoted his fraud also belong in jail.
The group of unelected people, known as The Electoral College, have sole right to choose the President and Vic President. If Obama is determined to be ineligible, the Electoral College has the Constitutional Right to elect any Natural Born Citizen they please. They can elect Paris Hilton and Tina Turner if they want to.
Every American should learn their lesson and never listen to another major media outlet again. Over 30 large newspapers in America are for sale and no takers. Some have cut back on deliveries and some will close. Some of these newspapers have been in business for over 100 years.
In less than 10 years of Political Correct “newspeak”, the editors have managed to destroy their companies. The New York Times recently announced that they are seeking a loan against their HQ building of which they own 50%.
They need to borrow $250million. And all they need to do to pay it back is to sell 500 million newspapers. The Major Media writers and smiling faces on TV get paid a lot of money to lie to us, but that should not exclude them from ridicule and contempt from their family and neighbors. It should also not exclude them from fraud charges. What kids would want to play with their kids?
The current President of the United States of America has the opportunity to leave his legacy as the President who preserved the United States of America and it’s Constitution. All he has to do, is to walk out onto the steps of the White House and announce, “If the United States Congress and Senate, if the US Supreme Court, Federal and State Courts from coast to coast will not respect their sworn duty to uphold and protect our Constitution, I will.
By a Presidential Executive Order, signed by me today, Barack Hussein Obama, or whatever his name is, is formally and legally prohibited from becoming the President of The United States. Effective immediately”. That would end all controversy and destroy all threats to the US Constitution.
Author’s note: People ask me why I publish articles in Russia’s Pravda Online. Many Americans do not realize just how controlled the American media is. Many more do not realize that Russia does have a Free Press that is far freer than the American Press.
The answer to the question is a question: How often have you ever seen the truth published in America? What I write does not in any way reflect the opinion of the Russian government or the Russian people. Nor does it reflect the opinion of the editors and employees of Pravda Online.
The Russian Constitution allows them the freedom to offer writers a place to express their own views. Anyone who does understand the dangers of an Obama Presidency should be thankful that there is a place where information can be shared, regardless of what Country that place is.
For Obama supporters: Don’t you just hate it seeing the truth about the guy who conned you?
Barack Obama has said to “Get in your neighbor’s face and argue”. That can not be done in America’s major media. They only allow one view, which is whatever theirs is for the day. I would love to be sitting in a back alley some dark night and watch Barry Obama get in Vladimir Putin’s face and argue.
Mark S. McGrew can be reached at McGrewMX@aol.com
Obama The Chicken - Pravda
Obama Has NOT Been Elected President - Pravda
Barack, The Amazing Mr. Obama - Pravda
Obama Conspiracy Theory Nuts - Pravda
FARSI VIDEO & SONG - I WILL NOT VOTE - I WILL NOT VOTE FOR THE xxxxxx MULLAHS
The song and graphics indicate the singers will not vote for the Mullahs, who are corrupt thieves, murderers, child abusers, women killers etc.
Posted in the Multilingual section, I have brought it up to the Main Page to allow wider viewing for anyone who understands some Persian. The lyrics are very simple.
MYSTERIOUS SHADOW - CODE NAME - OBAMA
Everything about him is suppressed.
Now Kenya says it'll censor his relatives there -- do they know the secret of his birth, that it was in Kenya, not in Hawaii? I'd wager they do.
Behold, the Manchurian Candidate, not the 1959 novel of Condon or the 1962 film with Sinatra, the real deal, financed by Soros and Saudis and Commies, oh my.
The Mysterious Shadow: Code Name Obama
18.12.2008
Source: Pravda.Ru
URL: http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/106848- Code_Name_Obama-0
By Mark S. McGrew
This document alone raises a big question. It is his registration in the State of Illinois for his license to practice Law. The document has a space to list any other names that have been used. Even though he has used other names, this shows, “None”. The other names he has used, that we currently know are: Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack Dunham and Barry Dunham.
During the Presidential debates with Senator John McCain, Obama never once addressed his opponent as “Senator McCain” or “Mr. McCain”.
Most people, who have any common courtesy at all, when speaking to their elders, or a senator, would address that person with some degree of respect and use his proper title. Senator McCain has more experience than Obama, is older, has risked his life for his country and does address other people, whatever their position, with respect. Obama, with a look of contempt, addressed Senator McCain as “John this” or “John that”.
Not once did he show any basic courtesy or manners to a war veteran, a 25 year member of the United States Senate, a man 25 years his senior.
John McCain was a Senator before Obama even knew what name to call himself.
Obama was sued in Federal Court to produce his birth certificate. He refused and instead hired two legal firms to make up reasons why he shouldn’t have to. The case was taken to the United States Supreme Court and they also asked him to respond.
Again, he refused. Obama took an oath to defend the Constitution.
Instead he speaks of changing it. There are other lawsuits that Obama is not responding to. In this photograph, we see Obama refusing to Salute the American flag and say the pledge of Allegiance as everyone else on the stage was doing. He doesn’t respect American citizens asking to see if he is eligible to be President.
He doesn’t respect the United States Federal Court or the United States Supreme Court or the United States Constitution. And if he was smoking pot and using cocaine as he says in is book, he doesn’t even respect himself.
This document, a Certification of Life Birth states Obama's place of birth as Hawaii, but is also says at the bottom, "any alterations invalidate this certificate" and at the top right, the certificate number is blacked out.
This officially invalidates the document and you or I could not use this to get a driver's license, but Obama expects to get the White House with it.
Obama’s own web site, FightTheSmearts.com does not say that he is a “natural born” citizen. Instead they admit: “The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America.”
And it goes on to admit further that he is not a “Natural Born” citizen when they say: “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire.
As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.”
In order to be a Natural Born citizen, one parent can not be a foreign citizen, and Obama’s web site discloses that his father was a British subject. If Obama or Soetoro or Dunham had been born on the floor of the Oval Office, he is not eligible to be President.
Barack Obama is no longer an attorney as he is “voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law” as of 2008. His wife, Michelle Obama has not been an attorney since 1993, and the Illinois registration says: “Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law” and “attorney is on court ordered inactive status”, long before her children were born.
She was an attorney for only four years, having quit 15 years ago.
The amount of speculation into Obama’s past is absolutley stunning.
Trying to trace his past is like climbing a tree. As soon as you start up the trunk, there are alternate branches, and the branches have branches and then more branches. It may be impossible to obtain correct information on his life. As some people have said, it is like trying to prove Saquatch, UFOs or ghosts exist. There is evidence to suggest he is “here” but no verifiable proof that he has the past that he claims. Or the present.
There is no proof that his grandmother died on the day his campaign said she did. The only announcment of her death that can be found is from his campaign people. But, who told them? There is no record.
I absolutely defy anyone to prove that his grandmother, Madelyn Payne Lee Dunham died in Hawaii on November 2nd or 3rd of the year 2008.
Obama has spent an estimated $500,000 or more on legal fess to keep his birth certificate from being seen.
For $25 or less, or probably no more than a phone call and a fax to Hawaii he can release his birth certificate and shut everybody up, once and for all. But he won’t do that.
Anyone can ask for their privacy to be respected, but in America, there is no such thing as a “Right” to privacy.
If a person is asking the citizens to allow him to be their President, it would be in that person’s interest for the public to know every thing there is to know about him. Unless, there is some extremely bad news.
American’s have elected criminals of all sorts to public office. Felons and minor criminals serve our country. A person sitting in a Federal Penitentiary, with a life sentence is able to run for public office, including the Presidency.
If American’s will allow a person with a criminal past or present to hold office, what exactly does Obama have to fear in letting the public see him?
Other records that he refuses to release are:
Original, vault copy of Certificate of Live Birth in the USA
Obama/Dunham marriage license
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license
Soetoro adoption records
Punahou School records
Selective Service Registration(Released. But, is possibly an altered
Document)
Occidental College records
Passport
Columbia College records
Columbia thesis
Harvard College records
Harvard Law Review articles(None (maybe 1, Not Signed)
University of Chicago scholarly articles(None)
Baptism certificate
Medical records
Law practice client list
Illinois State Senate records(None (Locked up to prohibit public view)
Illinois State Senate schedule(Lost (All other Illinois state senators'
records are intact)
With all of Obama’s different names, with his documented long term relations to convicted criminals, with his active efforts to prohibit us from knowing where he was born, with his active efforts to keep us from seeing his credentials, with his documented registration to practice law showing only one name, with his being an ex-attorney not authorized to practice law, but representing himself as such, with his non-existent “Office of The President Elect”, with the dozen or so lawsuits against him to prove his citizenship, with the various promises he made to voters and has since reneged on, with his documented complete lack of respect to America, with his refusal to salute the American flag and refusal to say the Pledge of Allegiance with others on stage and his other disrespectful actions, with his many millions of dollars in campaign funds suspected to be from foreign sources, with campaign donations accepted from possible terrorists groups, with his planned first official act as President to make a speech to the Muslim world in a Muslim Capitol, Obama has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that he can not in any way, shape or form be trusted.
With his association with William Ayers, a man who advocated and tried a violent overthrow of the US Government in which people did die, with his associations with Communist Party and Socialist Party organizations, with his financial support of Raila Odingo, a cousin in Kenya who, because elections didn’t turn out as he wanted them to, caused riots, the burning and destruction of several hundred Christian churches, several thousand deaths, rapes and hundreds of thousands of displaced citizens in Kenya, Obama has shown that he has no qualms about violence being used to effect “change”.
And especially, with the major news sources in America constant, steady, upbeat, relentless promotion of his unproven abilities and undocumented history, their absolute refusal to investigate or even question his eligibility to be President, with their constant attacks and insults against anyone who dares to question, with their subtle threats of riots or even civil war if Obama is not placed in the White House, there are serious concerns that Obama is not destined to be America’s President, but instead, won his votes from an incredibly mis-informed public, it is apparent that America is being forced to accept him.
Regardless of the conspiracy theories, suspicions, accusations and investigations about Obama, the simple questions that stand out above all others:
Is anyone in our military, any Federal employee, our Congress, our Senate, our Federal law enforcement agencies, our Federal intelligence agencies willing to follow his orders?
Are they legally able to obey his orders?
If they do obey his orders, and he is later declared to be ineligible, will the people who followed his orders be subjected to Nuremberg type trials in an International Court?
Will a future administration be able to prosecute Obama and his followers, as Alberto Gonzales confirmed to President George Bush in regards to torturing prisoners?
There are various people and organizations in America going to incredible efforts to uncover the truth, any truth, about Obama.
Lawsuits have been filed in State Courts. There are five lawsuits filed in the US Supreme Court with three of them pending now. State Courts and Federal Courts have taken the position that citizens do not have a right to verify that a Presidential candidate is eligible. Under the logic they use, there is not an entity on Earth who can ask a candidate to prove he is qualified under the US Constitution.
Dr. Orly Taitz has filed two separate lawsuits in the US Supreme Court, but on December 17, 2008 one case was denied, without giving a reason, by Justice Kennedy. Dr. Taitz will re-file with a different Justice soon.
There is one lawsuit that may be filed, that no one can deny that the plaintiffs have a Constitutional Right, a legal Right and a God given Right to verify the eligibility of a Presidential candidate: Military officers.
Military officers take an oath to defend the US Constitution against enemies, foreign and domestic. But more importantly, they have an obligation and a duty to refuse any order that they determine to be illegal.
Any military service member who carries out an order that he should know is illegal, can and will be Court Marshaled. Penalties range from being released from service to imprisonment to being executed, depending on the event.
Any military personnel who would like to be included in a lawsuit against Obama to prove he is legitimate should contact Orly Taitz or any number of other attorneys with lawsuits in process. Type in your search bar…Obama lawsuit…and you will find them.
Every American who is concerned about this situation needs to take some action today. If you can’t join the fight, then find someone to support financially. Most of the people filing these lawsuits and their lawyers are doing so with their own money. Most of the people on the Internet, trying to get the truth out, are using their own money. If you can’t take the time or don’t know what you can do, send money.
Win or lose, you will at least know you were a part of history. If Obama takes office and if Obama creates his civilian mandatory work program, forcing people to work for three months, as he and Rahm Emanuel have repeatedly said, and you did send somebody 10 bucks, at least you and your family are going to know you tried.
Or, keep the ten dollars, buy stamps and you can keep in touch sending postcards from camp to camp to each other and no one will have any sympathy for you.
With the turmoil Americans are facing in the Obama Presidency, the World also will suffer.
International political, business and military affairs always have operated on a level of trust. Those levels vary with the wind, but can any World leader trust a man who has no past, no allegiance and no respect for the society that enabled him to run for public office?
If a person has no loyalty and no respect to the people and the Nation that enabled him to succeed, he is incapable of being loyal about anything, to any purpose or to any person. Obama will have millions of soldiers and thousands of nuclear weapons at his disposal along with everything else in the arsenal of the American military.
How can any country trust this man not to push the button?
Any Treaty or agreement of any kind can be rescinded by a future administration.
Laws regarding international business can be rescinded.
The International Court can rescind anything Obama does.
This affair is the makings of a very well financed and influential group of criminal psychopaths. Obama is simply the mouthpiece.
According to Obama’s own words in his books, he is nothing but a pot smoking crack head street punk that some rich white guys found and made him take a shower and put on a tie.
Until Obama releases the records and accomplishments of his past, no one can prove otherwise. Hearsay is not admissible in Court and hearsay is all we have to listen to about Obama.
And yet, another huge question, and most mysterious of all is, why him? Of all the thousands of eligible people in the Democratic and Republican parties, WHY would they present two people to become a future president, with both being accused of not being Natural Born citizens?
The most controversial choice of the two and the most disturbing to society is Obama, the man who has no more verifiable occurrences in his life than a comic book character.
WHY, a man with so many secrets in his life, with so many gaping holes in his stories and so many mischievous, socially unacceptable characters in his life, why this one?
It must be considered that it is all a hoax and the intention has always been, since day one, to create a firestorm of opposition and chaos and confusion that produce some grand savior who will step in and declare a “mistrial” in the 2008 elections and keep the same people in the White House for another four years.
All these questions, all of the suspicions, all the missing links, all the investigations and lawsuits, all the rumors and all the theories, all of the mistrust and all of the little or big mistakes that Obama has made can disappear, just as if a thermonuclear explosion had vaporized them, if only Obama would produce a birth certificate that shows where and when he was born. What possible reason would any person have to not make a simple exchange like that?
Even children know, that a person who tells people over and over what he has done, but refuses to prove it, is called many names that are unfit to publish.
For me, somebody running around bragging, with nothing to back it up, is just a sissy and there is nothing more dangerous than a sissy with a gun.
Mark S. McGrew can be reached at McGrewMX@aol.com